Integrating structural and functional imaging for computer assisted detection of prostate cancer on multi-protocol in vivo 3 Tesla MRI

Screening and detection of prostate cancer (CaP) currently lacks an image-based protocol which is reflected in the high false negative rates currently associated with blinded sextant biopsies. Multi-protocol magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers high resolution functional and structural data about internal body structures (such as the prostate). In this paper we present a novel comprehensive computer-aided scheme for CaP detection from high resolution in vivo multi-protocol MRI by integrating functional and structural information obtained via dynamic-contrast enhanced (DCE) and T2-weighted (T2-w) MRI, respectively. Our scheme is fully-automated and comprises (a) prostate segmentation, (b) multimodal image registration, and (c) data representation and multi-classifier modules for information fusion. Following prostate boundary segmentation via an improved active shape model, the DCE/T2-w protocols and the T2-w/ex vivo histological prostatectomy specimens are brought into alignment via a deformable, multi-attribute registration scheme. T2-w/histology alignment allows for the mapping of true CaP extent onto the in vivo MRI, which is used for training and evaluation of a multi-protocol MRI CaP classifier. The meta-classifier used is a random forest constructed by bagging multiple decision tree classifiers, each trained individually on T2-w structural, textural and DCE functional attributes. 3-fold classifier cross validation was performed using a set of 18 images derived from 6 patient datasets on a per-pixel basis. Our results show that the results of CaP detection obtained from integration of T2-w structural textural data and DCE functional data (area under the ROC curve of 0.815) significantly outperforms detection based on either of the individual modalities (0.704 (T2-w) and 0.682 (DCE)). It was also found that a meta-classifier trained directly on integrated T2-w and DCE data (data-level integration) significantly outperformed a decision-level meta-classifier, constructed by combining the classifier outputs from the individual T2-w and DCE channels.

[1]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[2]  Pieter C. Vos,et al.  Combining T2-weighted with dynamic MR images for computerized classification of prostate lesions , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  Patients with a history of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and negative transrectal US-guided quadrant or sextant biopsy results: value of MR imaging. , 2002, Radiology.

[4]  A. Wunderlich,et al.  Multimodal Cranial Neuronavigation: Direct Integration of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography Data: Technical Note , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[5]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Multimodal image registration of ex vivo 4 Tesla MRI with whole mount histology for prostate cancer detection , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[6]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  A meta-classifier for detecting prostate cancer by quantitative integration of in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  C. Kim,et al.  Localization of Prostate Cancer Using 3T MRI: Comparison of T2-Weighted and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Imaging , 2006, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  Kevin J Parker,et al.  Three-dimensional registration of prostate images from histology and ultrasound. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Information Fusion in Biomedical Image Analysis: Combination of Data vs. Combination of Interpretations , 2005, IPMI.

[10]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[11]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Automated detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Olivier Rouvière,et al.  Evaluation of T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in localizing prostate cancer before repeat biopsy , 2009, European Radiology.

[13]  Robert E Lenkinski,et al.  Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging--initial results. , 2007, Radiology.

[14]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  COLLINARUS: collection of image-derived non-linear attributes for registration using splines , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[15]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[16]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  New methods of MR image intensity standardization via generalized scale , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[17]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  A Comprehensive Segmentation, Registration, and Cancer Detection Scheme on 3 Tesla In VivoProstate DCE-MRI , 2008, MICCAI.

[18]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Multi-Attribute Non-initializing Texture Reconstruction Based Active Shape Model (MANTRA) , 2008, MICCAI.

[19]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Computerized analysis of prostate lesions in the peripheral zone using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. , 2008, Medical physics.

[20]  William Wells,et al.  Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier. , 2003, Medical physics.

[21]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  A consensus embedding approach for segmentation of high resolution in vivo prostate magnetic resonance imagery , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[22]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation with morphology and tumour stage, histological grade and PSA. , 2000, Clinical radiology.