Computer-Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery

Over the last decade, orthopaedics has been one of the most active and diverse areas of development in computer-assisted surgery. Orthopaedics has been a specially challenging area of development as many orthopaedic surgeons consider the outcomes of conventional procedures generally successful. There is significant pressure to improve the efficiency and ergonomics, reduce cost and dependence on more expensive medical imaging modalities, and simplify the use and interfaces. Increasing emphasis on less invasive and minimally invasive procedures could give a significant boost to the adoption of computer-assisted surgery. In this paper, we present the overview of different approaches using a classification scheme that relies on two important criteria: 1) the autonomy of clinical action permitted to the system and 2) the imaging requirements

[1]  K. Radermacher,et al.  Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image based individual templates. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Development of a Surgical Robot for Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  Alon Wolf,et al.  MBARS: mini bone‐attached robotic system for joint arthroplasty , 2005 .

[4]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Precision Freehand Sculpting of Bone , 2004, MICCAI.

[5]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  Bone-mounted miniature robot for surgical procedures: Concept and clinical applications , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[6]  S. J. Harris,et al.  The first clinical application of a "hands-on" robotic knee surgery system. , 2001, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[7]  T Nishii,et al.  Computed-tomography-based computer preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. , 1998, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[8]  Tobias Achenbach,et al.  Robotic total knee arthroplastyThe accuracy of CT-based component placement , 2004, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[9]  Stéphane Lavallée,et al.  Building a Complete Surface Model from Sparse Data Using Statistical Shape Models: Application to Computer Assisted Knee Surgery System , 1998, MICCAI.

[10]  B Jaramaz,et al.  Image Guided Navigation System to Measure Intraoperatively Acetabular Implant Alignment , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  Peter Ritschl,et al.  The Galileo System for Implantation of Total Knee Arthoplasty , 2004 .

[12]  R. Kober,et al.  Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. , 2002, The Knee.

[13]  T. Kanade,et al.  Ultrasound Registration of the Bone Surface for Surgical Navigation , 2003, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[14]  Branislav Jaramaz,et al.  Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: minimally invasive hip and knee reconstruction. , 2004, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[15]  A. Amis,et al.  Rapid prototyping techniques for anatomical modelling in medicine. , 1997, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[16]  M. Börner,et al.  Clinical Experiences with ROBODOC and the Duracon Total Knee , 2004 .

[17]  J M Sikorski,et al.  Computer-assisted total knee replacement. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.