A fuzzy QFD program modelling approach using the method of imprecision

The use of quality function deployment (QFD) to aid decision making in product planning has gained extensive international attention, but current QFD approaches are unable to cope with complex product planning (CPP) characterized by involving multiple engineering characteristics (ECs) associated with significant uncertainty. To tackle this difficulty, in this paper, fuzzy set theory is embedded into a QFD framework and a novel fuzzy QFD program modelling approach to CPP is proposed to optimize the values of ECs by taking the design uncertainty and financial considerations into account. In the proposed methodology, fuzzy set theory is used to account for design uncertainty, and the method of imprecision (MoI) is employed to perform multiple-attribute synthesis to generate a family of synthesis strategies by varying the value of s, which indicates the different compensation levels among ECs. The proposed methodology will allow QFD practitioners to control the distribution of their development budget by presetting the value of s to determine the compensation levels among ECs. An illustrative example of the quality improvement of the design of a motor car is provided to demonstrate the application and performance of the modelling approach.

[1]  Gerald W. Evans,et al.  Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Erik K. Antonsson,et al.  Aggregation functions for engineering design trade-offs , 1995, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[3]  L. Zadeh.  Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility , 1999 .

[4]  C. K. Kwong,et al.  Inexact genetic algorithm approach to target values setting of engineering requirements in QFD , 2003 .

[5]  Kwang-Jae Kim,et al.  Determination of an Optimal Set of Design Requirements Using House of Quality , 1998 .

[6]  Lalit M. Patnaik,et al.  Genetic algorithms: a survey , 1994, Computer.

[7]  Carlo A. Mora-Monge,et al.  QFD strategy house: an innovative tool for linking marketing and manufacturing strategies , 2004 .

[8]  Hsing-Pei Kao,et al.  Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods , 1999 .

[9]  Jinxing Xie,et al.  An intelligent hybrid system for customer requirements analysis and product attribute targets determination , 1998 .

[10]  R. Y. K. Fung,et al.  Fuzzy expected value modelling approach for determining target values of engineering characteristics in QFD , 2005 .

[11]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Fuzzy linear programming technique for multiattribute group decision making in fuzzy environments , 2004, Inf. Sci..

[12]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Fuzzy multiple objective decision making approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment , 2004 .

[13]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Type-2 fuzzy sets made simple , 2002, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[14]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[15]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  Fuzzy regression-based mathematical programming model for quality function deployment , 2004 .

[16]  Ashraf Labib,et al.  A Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment (FQFD) model for deriving optimum targets , 2001 .

[17]  Ming Zhou.  Fuzzy logic and optimization models for implementing QFD , 1998 .

[18]  Shiang-Tai Liu.  Rating design requirements in fuzzy quality function deployment via a mathematical programming approach , 2005 .

[19]  Susan Carlson Skalak.  House of Quality , 2002 .

[20]  Soumaya Yacout,et al.  Concurrent optimization of customer requirements and the design of a new product , 2006 .

[21]  Juite Wang,et al.  Fuzzy outranking approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment , 1999 .

[22]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  A new approach to quality function deployment planning with financial consideration , 2002, Comput. Oper. Res..

[23]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  Framework of a fuzzy quality function deployment system , 1996 .