The Effects of Encumbrance and Mobility on Touch-Based Gesture Interactions for Mobile Phones

In this paper, we investigate the effects of mobility and encumbrance (holding objects such as shopping bags) on standard gestures commonly performed on touchscreens: tapping, dragging, spreading & pinching and rotating clockwise & anticlockwise when completed using a two-handed input posture. These one- and two- finger on-screen gesture inputs have become common but previous research has only examined tapping performance in everyday walking and encumbered situations. Therefore, a series of Fitts' Law style targeting tasks was designed to measure the performance of each gesture with users walking only and walking while carrying bags. The results showed that encumbrance and walking had a negative impact on each gesture in terms of accuracy except for rotational actions, which were performed well. Tapping and dragging both performed poorly which shows the input difficulties of single finger interactions when encumbered and on the move. Our findings will help designers choose the appropriate input techniques for future mobile user interfaces and apps in physically demanding contexts.

[1]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Comparing evaluation methods for encumbrance and walking on interaction with touchscreen mobile devices , 2014, MobileHCI '14.

[2]  Jian Zhao,et al.  A Model of Multi-touch Manipulation , 2011 .

[3]  Joaquim A. Jorge,et al.  Touch typing using thumbs: understanding the effect of mobility and hand posture , 2012, CHI.

[4]  Joanna Bergstrom-Lehtovirta,et al.  Ease of juggling: studying the effects of manual multitasking , 2011, CHI.

[5]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  The effects of walking speed on target acquisition on a touchscreen interface , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[6]  Daniel Vogel,et al.  Pinch-to-zoom-plus: an enhanced pinch-to-zoom that reduces clutching and panning , 2014, UIST.

[7]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Accuracy measures for evaluating computer pointing devices , 2001, CHI.

[8]  Enrico Rukzio,et al.  Investigating selection and reading performance on a mobile phone while walking , 2010, Mobile HCI.

[9]  Andrew Sears,et al.  An empirical comparison of use-in-motion evaluation scenarios for mobile computing devices , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Per Ola Kristensson,et al.  Multi-touch rotation gestures: performance and ergonomics , 2013, CHI.

[12]  Jacob O. Wobbrock,et al.  The effects of task dimensionality, endpoint deviation, throughput calculation, and experiment design on pointing measures and models , 2011, CHI.

[13]  B. Bederson,et al.  Understanding Single-Handed Mobile Device Interaction , 2006 .

[14]  Scott D. Mainwaring,et al.  Living for the Global City: Mobile Kits, Urban Interfaces, and Ubicomp , 2005, UbiComp.

[15]  Per Ola Kristensson,et al.  Multi-touch pinch gestures: performance and ergonomics , 2013, ITS.

[16]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  The Impact of Encumbrance on Mobile Interactions , 2013, INTERACT.

[17]  Andrew Sears,et al.  How do people tap when walking? An empirical investigation of nomadic data entry , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[18]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Fitts' throughput and the speed-accuracy tradeoff , 2008, CHI.

[19]  Jacob O. Wobbrock,et al.  Getting off the treadmill: evaluating walking user interfaces for mobile devices in public spaces , 2008, Mobile HCI.

[20]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Understanding performance in touch selections: Tap, drag and radial pointing drag with finger, stylus and mouse , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Gait phase effects in mobile interaction , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[22]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Investigating the effects of encumbrance on one- and two- handed interactions with mobile devices , 2014, CHI.

[23]  Jacob O. Wobbrock,et al.  WalkType: using accelerometer data to accomodate situational impairments in mobile touch screen text entry , 2012, CHI.

[24]  John C. Thomas,et al.  Exploring pinch and spread gestures on mobile devices , 2013, MobileHCI '13.

[25]  Jon Froehlich,et al.  Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input , 2013, CHI.

[26]  Alexander Ng The effects of encumbrance on mobile interactions , 2014, MobileHCI '14.

[27]  Michitaka Hirose,et al.  Elderly User Evaluation of Mobile Touchscreen Interactions , 2011, INTERACT.

[28]  I.,et al.  Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[29]  Jesse M. Heines,et al.  Selecting While Walking: An Investigation of Aiming Performance in a Mobile Work Context , 2007, AMCIS.

[30]  Mark H. Chignell,et al.  Mobile text entry: relationship between walking speed and text input task difficulty , 2005, Mobile HCI.