Removal of root substance with the Vector-system compared with conventional debridement in vitro.

OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to assess the removal of root substance with the Vector-system depending on different irrigation fluids and to compare the results with conventional methods for root debridement. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty extracted human teeth were treated using four different methods: Vector-system with polishing fluid and metal curette (VP), Vector-system with abrasive fluid and metal curette (VA), conventional ultrasonic system (U) with insert tip "P" and hand instrument. Treatment of the calculus-free root surfaces was carried out for a total of 12 min. using an artificial periodontal pocket. At intervals of 120 s, the removal of dental hard tissues was assessed using a three-dimensional (3D) laser scanning device and the Match 3D software with an accuracy of 0.00001 mm(3). RESULTS No difference in the removal of root substance with the hand instrument (0.0055 mm(3)/s) and the Vector-system using the abrasive fluid (0.0044 mm(3)/s) could be observed (p=0.51). Using these two systems, a larger amount of root substance (p<0.05) was removed compared with the other methods (U: 0.0023 mm(3)/s, VP: 0.0022 mm(3)/s), which did not differ from each other (p=0.76). CONCLUSIONS The present study indicates that the Vector-system in combination with polishing fluid or conventional ultrasonics might be used for root debridement without extensive root substance removal.

[1]  R. Hickel,et al.  Safety and efficiency of novel sonic scaler tips in vitro. , 2003, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[2]  A. Braun,et al.  Subjective intensity of pain during the treatment of periodontal lesions with the Vector-system. , 2003, Journal of periodontal research.

[3]  A. Heinecke,et al.  A systematic review of efficacy of machine-driven and manual subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. , 2002, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[4]  T. Kocher,et al.  Substance loss caused by scaling with different sonic scaler inserts--an in vitro study. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[5]  P. Schmidlin,et al.  Tooth substance loss resulting from mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic root instrumentation assessed by liquid scintillation. , 2001, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[6]  R. Genco,et al.  Position paper: sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontics. Research, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Academy of Periodontology. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[7]  A. Walmsley,et al.  Acoustic microstreaming: detection and measurement around ultrasonic scalers. , 1999, Journal of periodontology.

[8]  R Hickel,et al.  Working parameters of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[9]  R Hickel,et al.  The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro. , 1998, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[10]  R. Hickel,et al.  Working parameters of a sonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro , 1997, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[11]  B. Smith,et al.  Root substance removal by scaling and root planing. , 1991, Journal of periodontology.

[12]  A. Hefti,et al.  An in vitro investigation on the loss of root substance in scaling with various instruments. , 1991, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[13]  M. Wilson,et al.  Assessment of ultrasonic debridement of calculus-associated periodontally-involved root surfaces by the limulus amoebocyte lysate assay. An in vitro study. , 1991, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[14]  V. Iacono,et al.  Recolonization of the subgingival microflora after scaling and root planing in human periodontitis. , 1990, Journal of periodontology.

[15]  A. Walmsley,et al.  Effects of cavitational activity on the root surface of teeth during ultrasonic scaling. , 1990, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[16]  M. Wilson,et al.  The assessment of ultrasonic root surface debridement by determination of residual endotoxin levels. , 1988, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[17]  P. A. Farber,et al.  In vitro attachment of human gingival fibroblasts to root surfaces. , 1975, Journal of periodontology.

[18]  S. M. Clark,et al.  The effect of ultrasonic instrumentation on root surfaces. , 1968, The Journal of Periodontology.