Measuring the value of "all play and no work": Can rigorous assessment of simulation games drive innovative teaching in construction?

The construction field is dynamic and dominated by complex, ill-defined problems for which myriad possible solutions exist. Teaching students to solve construction-related problems requires an understanding of the nature of these complex problems as well as the implementation of effective instructional strategies to address them. Traditional approaches to teaching construction planning and management have long been criticized for presenting students primarily with well-defined problems – an approach inconsistent with the challenges encountered in the industry. However, growing evidence suggests that employing innovative teaching approaches, such as interactive simulation games, offers more active, hands-on and problem-based learning opportunities for students to synthesize and test acquired knowledge more closely aligned with real-life construction scenarios. Simulation games have demonstrated educational value in increasing student problem solving skills and motivation through critical attributes such as interaction and feedback-supported active learning. Nevertheless, broad acceptance of simulation games in construction engineering education remains limited. While recognizing benefits, research focused on the role of simulation games in educational settings lacks a unified approach to developing, implementing and evaluating these games. To address this gap, this paper provides an overview of the challenges associated with evaluating the effectiveness of simulation games in construction education that still impede their wide adoption. An overview of the current status, as well as the results from recently implemented Virtual Construction Simulator (VCS) game at Penn State provide lessons learned, and are intended to guide future efforts in developing interactive simulation games to reach their full potential.

[1]  Udo Konradt,et al.  Strategies of failure diagnosis in computer-controlled manufacturing systems: empirical analysis and implications for the design of adaptive decision support system , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[2]  Chris Dede,et al.  Assessment, Technology, and Change , 2010 .

[3]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  R. Mayer Thinking, Problem Solving, Cognition , 1983 .

[5]  Marinus Voeten,et al.  Online Measurement Of Appraisals Of Students Faced With Curricular Tasks , 2003 .

[6]  Traci Sitzmann A META-ANALYTIC EXAMINATION OF THE INSTRUCTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPUTER-BASED SIMULATION GAMES , 2011 .

[7]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  The Virtual Construction Simulator: Evaluating an Educational Simulation Application for Teaching Construction Management Concepts , 2010 .

[8]  H. O'Neil,et al.  Classification of learning outcomes: evidence from the computer games literature , 2005 .

[9]  Ali Jaafari,et al.  VIRCON: INTERACTIVE SYSTEM FOR TEACHING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT , 2001 .

[10]  D. Kirkpatrick Evaluating Training Programs , 1994 .

[11]  Margaret E. Gredler,et al.  Games and Simulations and Their Relationships to Learning , 2013 .

[12]  Philip Banyard,et al.  Thinking & problem solving , 1991 .

[13]  Deborah Vivian Warren DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF SIMULATION/GAME SOFTWARE: IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION , 2001 .

[14]  Eddy M. Rojas,et al.  General-Purpose Situational Simulation Environment for Construction Education , 2005 .

[15]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators , 2006 .

[16]  David Scott,et al.  Scheduling Game for Construction Industry Training , 1973 .

[17]  Mario Szczurek,et al.  Meta-analysis of simulation games effectiveness for cognitive learning. , 1982 .

[18]  James E. Driskell,et al.  Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model , 2002 .

[19]  Lisa Galarneau,et al.  Authentic Learning Experiences Through Play: Games, Simulations and the Construction of Knowledge , 2005, DiGRA Conference.

[20]  Atsusi Hirumi,et al.  Examining the pedagogical foundations of modern educational computer games , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[21]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  Learner-centered education , 1996, CACM.

[22]  Fengfeng Ke,et al.  A Qualitative Meta-Analysis of Computer Games as Learning Tools , 2009 .

[23]  Saad H.S. Al-Jibouri,et al.  The Application of a Simulation Model and Its Effectiveness in Teaching Construction Planning and Control , 2005 .

[24]  Anil Sawhney,et al.  Internet-based Interactive Construction Management Learning System. , 2000 .

[25]  Eddy M. Rojas,et al.  Defining Construction Management Events in Situational Simulations , 2007 .

[26]  Richard N. Van Eck,et al.  The effect of competition and contextualized advisement on the transfer of mathematics skills a computer-based instructional simulation game , 2002 .

[27]  R. Mayer Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving , 1998 .

[28]  Michelle F. Wright,et al.  Computer Gaming and Interactive Simulations for Learning: A Meta-Analysis , 2006 .

[29]  John Washbush,et al.  A Review of Scholarship on Assessing Experiential Learning Effectiveness , 2004 .

[30]  Robert M. Gagné,et al.  The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction , 1985 .

[31]  Gareth Pender,et al.  Problem-Based Learning Approach to Construction Management Teaching , 2002 .

[32]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction , 1981, Cogn. Sci..