An alternating lock-down strategy for sustainable mitigation of COVID-19

Lacking a drug or vaccine, our current strategy to contain the COVID-19 pandemic is by means of social distancing, specifically mobility restrictions and lock-downs. Such measures impose a hurtful toll on the economy, and are difficult to sustain for extended periods. The challenge is that selective isolation of the sick, an often viable and effective strategy, is insufficient against COVID-19, due to its relatively long incubation period, in which exposed individuals experience no symptoms, but still contribute to the spread. Here we propose an alternating lock-down strategy, in which at every instance, half of the population remains under lock-down while the other half continues to be active, maintaining a routine of weekly succession between activity and lock-down. All symptomatic individuals continue to remain in isolation. Under this regime, if an individual was exposed during their active week, by the time they complete their lock-down they will already begin to exhibit symptoms. Hence this strategy isolates the majority of exposed individuals during their asymptomatic phase. We find that this strategy not only overcomes the pandemic, but also allows for some level of flexibility, withstanding a fraction of defectors or essential workers that remain continuously active. We examine our strategy based on current epidemiological models with parameters relevant for COVID-19. We wish, however, following this communication, to further test and fine-tune our scheme based more refined data, and assess its actual effectiveness.

[1]  T. Hollingsworth,et al.  How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? , 2020, The Lancet.

[2]  T. Geisel,et al.  Forecast and control of epidemics in a globalized world. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Epidemic processes in complex networks , 2014, ArXiv.

[4]  Jing Zhao,et al.  Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  P. Klepac,et al.  Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts , 2020, The Lancet Global Health.

[6]  Min Kang,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Upper Respiratory Specimens of Infected Patients , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Alessandro Vespignani Modelling dynamical processes in complex socio-technical systems , 2011, Nature Physics.

[8]  David Cyranoski,et al.  What China’s coronavirus response can teach the rest of the world , 2020, Nature.

[9]  C. Fraser,et al.  Epidemiology, transmission dynamics and control of SARS: the 2002-2003 epidemic. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.