Automatic exposure control in computed tomography – an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers

Background: Today, practically all computed tomography (CT) systems are delivered with automatic exposure control (AEC) systems operating with tube current modulation in three dimensions. Each of these systems has different specifications and operates somewhat differently. Purpose: To evaluate AEC systems from four different CT scanner manufacturers: General Electric (GE), Philips, Siemens, and Toshiba, considering their potential for reducing radiation exposure to the patient while maintaining adequate image quality. Material and Methods: The dynamics (adaptation along the longitudinal axis) of tube current modulation of each AEC system were investigated by scanning an anthropomorphic chest phantom using both 16- and 64-slice CT scanners from each manufacturer with the AEC systems activated and inactivated. The radiation dose was estimated using the parameters in the DICOM image information and image quality was evaluated based on image noise (standard deviation of CT numbers) calculated in 0.5 cm2 circular regions of interest situated throughout the spine region of the chest phantom. Results: We found that tube current modulation dynamics were similar among the different AEC systems, especially between GE and Toshiba systems and between Philips and Siemens systems. Furthermore, the magnitude of the reduction in the exposure dose was considerable, in the range of 35–60%. However, in general the image noise increased when the AEC systems were used, especially in regions where the tube current was greatly decreased, such as the lung region. However, the variation in image noise among images obtained along the scanning direction was lower when using the AEC systems compared with fixed mAs. Conclusion: The AEC systems available in modern CT scanners can contribute to a significant reduction in radiation exposure to the patient and the image noise becomes more uniform within any given scan.

[1]  J. Damilakis,et al.  Angular on-line tube current modulation in multidetector CT examinations of children and adults: the influence of different scanning parameters on dose reduction. , 2007, Medical physics.

[2]  M. Söderberg,et al.  The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[3]  M. Kalra,et al.  Optimization of Z-axis automatic exposure control for multidetector row CT evaluation of neck and comparison with fixed tube current technique for image quality and radiation dose. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[4]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  Technical approaches to the optimisation of CT. , 2008, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[5]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis. , 2004, Radiology.

[7]  G. Iball,et al.  Assessment of tube current modulation in pelvic CT. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  C. McCollough,et al.  CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[9]  岩崎 民子.  SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[10]  M. Kalra,et al.  Reducing radiation dose in emergency computed tomography with automatic exposure control techniques , 2005, Emergency Radiology.

[11]  John Damilakis,et al.  Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult multidetector CT examinations: a phantom study on dose reduction and image quality. , 2008, Medical physics.

[12]  M. Kalra,et al.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. , 2004, Radiology.

[13]  O Matsui,et al.  Comparison between 3-D and z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique in multidetector-row CT. , 2008, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[14]  Geneviève Gaboriaud,et al.  Automatic exposure control in multichannel CT with tube current modulation to achieve a constant level of image noise: experimental assessment on pediatric phantoms. , 2007, Medical physics.

[15]  Lee W Goldman,et al.  Principles of CT: Radiation Dose and Image Quality* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

[16]  Mannudeep K Kalra,et al.  Computed tomography radiation dose optimization: scanning protocols and clinical applications of automatic exposure control. , 2005, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.

[17]  Nicholas Keat,et al.  CT scanner automatic exposure control systems , 2005 .

[18]  CT-automatic exposure control devices : What are their performances? , 2007 .

[19]  T. Mulkens,et al.  Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. , 2005, Radiology.

[20]  M. Kalra,et al.  Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. , 2004, Radiology.

[21]  C C Bianchi,et al.  Effective dose and image quality evaluations of an automatic CT tube current modulation system with an anthropomorphic phantom. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[22]  Cynthia H McCollough.  Automatic exposure control in CT: are we done yet? , 2005, Radiology.

[23]  H. Goo,et al.  The influences of tube voltage and scan direction on combined tube current modulation: a phantom study , 2006, Pediatric Radiology.