The sense of agency in human-human vs human-robot joint action

Kinesthesis pertains to the perception of moving body parts, while the sense of agency refers to the experience of controlling one's action-effects. Based on previous work, we hypothesized that the sense of agency would decrease in joint action with a robot compared to a human partner. Pairs of participants were jointly manipulating two interconnected haptic devices enabling them to feel each other's forces. Unbeknown to participants, their partner was sometimes replaced by a robot. The sense of agency was assessed using intentional binding, which refers to a contraction of perceived time between an action and its effect for intentional actions, and participants' judgment of their contribution to joint action. Participants judged their contribution as higher when they were initiating action and when they were paired with the robot. By contrast, intentional binding occurred only with a human partner. This outcome supports the hypothesis that human-robot joint action hinders intentional binding.

[1]  James Jaccard,et al.  Pairwise multiple comparison procedures: A review. , 1984 .

[2]  Andrea Desantis,et al.  Mechanisms of intentional binding and sensory attenuation: the role of temporal prediction, temporal control, identity prediction, and motor prediction. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  D. Wegner,et al.  Apparent mental causation. Sources of the experience of will. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[5]  Ludovic Saint-Bauzel,et al.  Implementation of haptic communication in comanipulative tasks: A statistical state machine model , 2016, 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[6]  Natalie Sebanz,et al.  The sense of agency during skill learning in individuals and dyads , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[7]  O. Grynszpan,et al.  Predictive Mechanisms Are Not Involved the Same Way during Human-Human vs. Human-Machine Interactions: A Review , 2017, Front. Neurorobot..

[8]  U. Alon,et al.  The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Sukhvinder S. Obhi,et al.  Sense of agency in joint action: influence of human and computer co-actors , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  G. Knoblich,et al.  Do Implicit and Explicit Measures of the Sense of Agency Measure the Same Thing? , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  P. Haggard,et al.  Sense of agency , 2012, Current Biology.

[12]  Sukhvinder S. Obhi,et al.  Sense of agency and intentional binding in joint action , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  E. Pacherie How does it feel to act together? , 2014 .

[14]  Bruno Berberian,et al.  Predictive Mechanisms Are Not Involved the Same Way during Human-Human vs. Human-Machine Interactions: A Review , 2017, Front. Neurorobot..

[15]  Uri Alon,et al.  A reduced-dimensionality approach to uncovering dyadic modes of body motion in conversations , 2017, PloS one.

[16]  Francesca Garbarini,et al.  Temporal perception in joint action: This is MY action , 2016, Consciousness and Cognition.

[17]  F. Richer,et al.  The SEMAPHORO Haptic Interface: a real-time low-cost open-source implementation for dyadic teleoperation , 2018 .

[18]  Ludovic Saint-Bauzel,et al.  High Stiffness in Teleoperated Comanipulation: Necessity or Luxury? , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[19]  A. Newen,et al.  Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[20]  Martina Rieger,et al.  Action and perception in social contexts: intentional binding for social action effects , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[21]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[22]  P. Haggard,et al.  Voluntary action and conscious awareness , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Carmen Weiss,et al.  The Self in Social Interactions: Sensory Attenuation of Auditory Action Effects Is Stronger in Interactions with Others , 2011, PloS one.

[24]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Abnormalities in the awareness of action , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  P. Haggard Conscious intention and motor cognition , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.