In vivo measurements of the triceps surae complex architecture in man: implications for muscle function

1 The objectives of this study were to (1) quantify experimentally in vivo changes in pennation angle, fibre length and muscle thickness in the triceps surae complex in man in response to changes in ankle position and isometric plantarflexion moment and (2) compare changes in the above muscle architectural characteristics occurring in the transition from rest to a given isometric plantarflexion intensity with the estimations of a planimetric muscle model assuming constant thickness and straight muscle fibres. 2 The gastrocnemius medialis (GM), gastrocnemius lateralis (GL) and soleus (SOL) muscles of six males were scanned with ultrasonography at different sites along and across the muscle belly at rest and during maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) trials at ankle angles of −15 deg (dorsiflexed direction), 0 deg (neutral position), +15 deg (plantarflexed direction) and +30 deg. Additional images were taken at 80, 60, 40 and 20 % of MVC at an ankle angle of 0 deg. 3 In all three muscles and all scanned sites, as ankle angle increased from −15 to +30 deg, pennation increased (by 6–12 deg, 39–67 %, P < 0.01 at rest and 9–16 deg, 29–43 %, P < 0.01 during MVC) and fibre length decreased (by 15–28 mm, 32–34 %, P < 0.01 at rest and 8–10 mm, 27–30 %, P < 0.05 during MVC). Thickness in GL and SOL increased during MVC compared with rest (by 5–7 mm, 36–47 %, P < 0.01 in GL and 6–7 mm, 38–47 %, P < 0.01 in SOL) while thickness of GM did not differ (P > 0.05) between rest and MVC. 4 At any given ankle angle the model underestimated changes in GL and SOL occurring in the transition from rest to MVC in pennation angle (by 9–12 deg, 24–38 %, P < 0.01 in GL and 9–14 deg, 25–28 %, P < 0.01 in SOL) and fibre length (by 6–15 mm, 22–39 %, P < 0.01 in GL and 6–8 mm, 23–24 %, P < 0.01 in SOL). 5 The findings of the study indicate that the mechanical output of muscle as estimated by the model used may be unrealistic due to errors in estimating the changes in muscle architecture during contraction compared with rest.

[1]  P. Huijing,et al.  Changes in geometry of activily shortening unipennate rat gastrocnemius muscle , 1993, Journal of morphology.

[2]  R. D. Woittiez,et al.  A three‐dimensional muscle model: A quantified relation between form and function of skeletal muscles , 1984, Journal of morphology.

[3]  A. Crenshaw,et al.  Intramuscular pressure and electromyography as indexes of force during isokinetic exercise. , 1993, Journal of applied physiology.

[4]  R D Herbert,et al.  Changes in pennation with joint angle and muscle torque: in vivo measurements in human brachialis muscle. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  T. Fukunaga,et al.  Muscle architecture and function in humans. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  T. Fukunaga,et al.  Muscle-fiber pennation angles are greater in hypertrophied than in normal muscles. , 1993, Journal of applied physiology.

[7]  R J Baskin,et al.  Volume change and pressure development in muscle during contraction. , 1967, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  R. Brand,et al.  Muscle fiber architecture in the human lower limb. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Z. Muhl Active length‐tension relation and the effect of muscle pinnation on fiber lengthening , 1982, Journal of morphology.

[10]  F. Zajac Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[11]  J L Van Leeuwen,et al.  Modelling mechanically stable muscle architectures. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  P. Cerretelli,et al.  In vivo human gastrocnemius architecture with changing joint angle at rest and during graded isometric contraction. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  V. Edgerton,et al.  Physiological cross‐sectional area of human leg muscles based on magnetic resonance imaging , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  R. D. Woittiez,et al.  The Effect of Architecture On Skeletal Muscle Performance: a Simple Planimetric Model , 1983 .

[15]  A Huson,et al.  Active force-length relationship of human lower-leg muscles estimated from morphological data: a comparison of geometric muscle models. , 1991, European journal of morphology.

[16]  V. Edgerton,et al.  Muscle architecture of the human lower limb. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  E. Otten Concepts and Models of Functional Architecture in Skeletal Muscle , 1988, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[18]  C. Gans Fiber architecture and muscle function. , 1982, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[19]  C. Gans,et al.  The functional significance of muscle architecture--a theoretical analysis. , 1965, Ergebnisse der Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte.

[20]  O. Sejersted,et al.  Intramuscular fluid pressure during isometric contraction of human skeletal muscle. , 1984, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.