Online searching and learning: YUM and other search tools for children and teachers

Information discovery tasks using online search tools are performed on a regular basis by school-age children. However, these tools are not necessarily designed to both explicitly facilitate the retrieval of resources these young users can comprehend and aid low-literacy searchers. This is of particular concern for educational environments, as there is an inherent expectation that these tools facilitate effective learning. In this manuscript we present an initial assessment conducted over (1) children-oriented search tools based on queries generated by K-9 students, analyzing features such as readability and adequacy of retrieved results, and (2) tools used by teachers in their classrooms, analyzing their main purpose and target audience’s age range. Among the examined tools, we include YouUnderstood.Me, an enhanced search environment, which is the result of our ongoing efforts on the development of a search environment tailored to 5-15 year-olds that can foster learning through the retrieval of materials that not only satisfy the information needs of these users but also match their reading abilities. The results of these studies highlight the fact that search results presented to children have average reading levels that do not match the target audience. In addition, tools oriented to teachers do not go beyond showing the progress of their students, and seldomly provide a simple way of retrieving class contents that fit current needs of students. These facts further showcase the need for developing a dual environment oriented to both teachers and students.

[1]  N. Mercer,et al.  The role of exploratory talk in classroom search engine tasks , 2015 .

[2]  Maria Soledad Pera,et al.  "Is Sven Seven?": A Search Intent Module for Children , 2016, SIGIR.

[3]  Joyce Kasman Valenza,et al.  Chapter 8: Curation Platforms , 2014 .

[4]  Andreas Nürnberger,et al.  Knowledge Journey Exhibit: Towards Age-Adaptive Search User Interfaces , 2015, ECIR.

[5]  G. Spache,et al.  A New Readability Formula for Primary-Grade Reading Materials , 1953, The Elementary School Journal.

[6]  Yin Leng Theng,et al.  Scaffolding in information search: Effects on less experienced searchers , 2016, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Ruimin Shen,et al.  Why web 2.0 is good for learning and for research: principles and prototypes , 2008, WWW.

[8]  Barrie Gunter,et al.  The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future , 2008, Aslib Proc..

[9]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Patterns of search: analyzing and modeling Web query refinement , 1999 .

[10]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Exploring young children's web searching and technoliteracy , 2010, J. Documentation.

[11]  Jeni Tennison,et al.  Learning When Searching for Web Data , 2016, SAL@SIGIR.

[12]  Sue Bennett,et al.  Becoming an Online Teacher: Adapting to a Changed Environment for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education , 2004 .

[13]  Ofcom,et al.  Children and parents: media use and attitudes report , 2015 .

[14]  Mahmud M. Shihab Web 2.0 Tools Improve Teaching and Collaboration in High School English Language Classes , 2009 .

[15]  Elizabeth K. Wilson,et al.  Gateway Tools: Five Tools to Allow Teachers to Overcome Barriers to Technology Integration , 2013 .

[16]  Maria Soledad Pera,et al.  Finding, Understanding and Learning: Making Information Discovery Tasks Useful for Children and Teachers , 2016, SAL@SIGIR.

[17]  Panagiotis Takis Metaxas,et al.  "Of course it's true; I saw it on the Internet!": critical thinking in the Internet era , 2003, CACM.

[18]  Jaap Kamps,et al.  Supporting the Process: Adapting Search Systems to Search Stages , 2015, ECIL.

[19]  Valerie Greenhill,et al.  21st Century Knowledge and Skills in Educator Preparation. , 2010 .

[20]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Exploring pre-service teachers' beliefs about using Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 classroom , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[21]  M. Irigoyen,et al.  Exposure and Use of Mobile Media Devices by Young Children , 2015, Pediatrics.

[22]  Kevyn Collins-Thompson,et al.  Towards searching as a learning process: A review of current perspectives and future directions , 2016, J. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Dania Bilal,et al.  Differences and similarities in information seeking: children and adults as Web users , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..

[24]  Donald H. Kraft,et al.  Advances in Information Retrieval: Where Is That /#*&@¢ Record? , 1985, Adv. Comput..

[25]  Djoerd Hiemstra,et al.  An analysis of queries intended to search information for children , 2010, IIiX.

[26]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Personalizing web search results by reading level , 2011, CIKM '11.

[27]  G. Harry McLaughlin,et al.  SMOG Grading - A New Readability Formula. , 1969 .

[28]  Özgür Ulusoy,et al.  How k-12 students search for learning?: analysis of an educational search engine log , 2014, SIGIR.

[29]  Kai Zheng,et al.  Assessing the readability of ClinicalTrials.gov , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[30]  Richard Hartshorne,et al.  An Introductory Examination of Factors Influencing K-12 Teachers Perceptions and Use of Emerging Technological Tools in the Classroom , 2015 .

[31]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Search as Learning (SAL) Workshop 2016 , 2016, SIGIR.

[32]  Max L. Wilson,et al.  Search Literacy: Learning to Search to Learn , 2016, SAL@SIGIR.

[33]  Susan J. Danby,et al.  Going online: Young children and teachers accessing knowledge through web interactions , 2013 .

[34]  J. Bowey,et al.  A reading-level design study of phonological skills underlying fourth-grade children's word reading difficulties. , 1992, Child development.

[35]  Mark L. Davison,et al.  Exploring gains in reading and mathematics achievement among regular and exceptional students using , 2013 .

[36]  Robert W. Cole,et al.  Educating Everybody's Children: Diverse Teaching Strategies for Diverse Learners. What Research and Practice Say about Improving Achievement. , 1995 .

[37]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Searching as learning: Novel measures for information interaction research , 2014, ASIST.

[38]  Julie Coiro,et al.  The New Literacies of Online Research and Comprehension: Assessing and Preparing Students for the 21st Century With Common Core State Standards , 2013 .

[39]  Dania Bilal,et al.  Towards New Methodologies for Assessing Relevance of Information Retrieval from Web Search Engines on Children ’ s Queries , 2013 .

[40]  Rebecca D Pentz,et al.  Another look at the informed consent process: The document and the conversation , 2016, Cancer.

[41]  Thomas A. Brush,et al.  Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research , 2007 .

[42]  Tatiana Gossen Targeted Search Engines for Children , 2015, SIGIR Forum.

[43]  Wei Chu,et al.  Personalized ranking model adaptation for web search , 2013, SIGIR.

[44]  Adam Jatowt,et al.  "Towards more readable web: measuring readability of web pages based on link structure" by Adam Jatowt, Kouichi Akamatsu, Nimit Pattanasri, and Katsumi Tanaka with Ching-man Au Yeung as coordinator , 2012, LINK.

[45]  Anita Crescenzi,et al.  Metacognitive Knowledge and Metacognitive Regulation in Time-Constrained in Information Search , 2016, SAL@SIGIR.

[46]  Nancy Law,et al.  The development of information search expertise of research students , 2008, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[47]  Nigel Ford,et al.  How do children reformulate their search queries? , 2015, Inf. Res..

[48]  Ingmar Weber,et al.  What and how children search on the web , 2011, CIKM '11.

[49]  R. Flesch A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[50]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Editorial: Recent advances on searching as learning: An introduction to the special issue , 2016, J. Inf. Sci..

[51]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Searching as learning (SAL) workshop 2014 , 2014, IIiX.

[52]  M. Volman,et al.  The Web as an Information Resource in K–12 Education: Strategies for Supporting Students in Searching and Processing Information , 2005 .

[53]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Personalizing atypical web search sessions , 2013, WSDM.

[54]  Hal Burdick,et al.  THE LEXILE FRAMEWORK AS AN APPROACH FOR READING MEASUREMENT AND SUCCESS , 2004 .

[55]  Dania Bilal,et al.  Evaluating Leading Web Search Engines on Children's Queries , 2011, HCI.

[56]  Justine Alsop-Cotton Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century , 2009 .

[57]  Kevyn Collins-Thompson,et al.  Optimizing Search Results for Educational Goals: Incorporating Keyword Density as a Retrieval Objective , 2016, SAL@SIGIR.

[58]  Andreas Nürnberger,et al.  Find it if you can: usability case study of search engines for young users , 2012, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[59]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  Children's web search with Google: the effectiveness of natural language queries , 2012, IDC '12.

[60]  Andreas Nürnberger,et al.  A comparative study about children's and adults' perception of targeted web search engines , 2014, CHI.

[61]  Simon Knight,et al.  Finding Knowledge: What Is It To ‘Know’ When We Search? , 2014 .