Integrating Construction Operation and Context in Large-Scale Construction Using Hybrid Computer Simulation

This research proposes a hybrid simulation approach based upon the principles of system dynamics (SD) and discrete event simulation (DES), which facilitates a better understanding of complex interactions among various processes in large-scale construction. The significance of the construction context that interacts with construction operations is highlighted, and a hybrid SD-DES approach is proposed as a means to capture the feedback between the two. In particular, this paper focuses on how to seamlessly integrate SD and DES within the framework of a modeling perspective. For the purpose of substantiating the discussion, a pipeline installation process is modeled using the proposed hybrid approach, with specific consideration given to how the approach can serve to address complex interactions between operation and context.

[1]  Simaan M. AbouRizk,et al.  Construction project simulation using CYCLONE , 1998 .

[2]  Photios G. Ioannou,et al.  State and Resource Based Construction Process Simulation , 1994 .

[3]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  Comparative Study of Discrete-Event Simulation and System Dynamics for Construction Process Planning , 2005 .

[4]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  Dynamic Planning for Fast-Tracking Building Construction Projects , 2001 .

[5]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  Lead time reduction via pre-positioning of inventory in an industrial construction supply chain , 2002, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.

[6]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  Dynamic change management for construction: introducing the change cycle into model‐based project management , 2003 .

[7]  Daniel W. Halpin,et al.  State of the art in construction simulation , 1992, WSC '92.

[8]  Boyd C. Paulson.  Interactive Graphics for Simulating Construction Operations , 1978 .

[9]  Albert T. Jones,et al.  A hybrid simulation approach to planning in a VMI supply chain , 2006, Int. J. Simul. Process. Model..

[10]  Alan J. Mayne,et al.  Introduction to Simulation and SLAM , 1979 .

[11]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Business dynamics : systems thinking and modelling for acomplex world , 2002 .

[12]  J. Kim,et al.  A construction process simulation Web service , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, 2003..

[13]  Moonseo Park,et al.  Quality and Change Management Model for Large Scale Concurrent Design and Construction Projects , 2005 .

[14]  Stuart D. Anderson,et al.  Managing Constructibility Reviews to Reduce Highway Project Durations , 2004 .

[15]  David N. Ford,et al.  Dynamic modeling of product development processes , 1998 .

[16]  Awad S. Hanna,et al.  Decision Tree Approach to Classify and Quantify Cumulative Impact of Change Orders on Productivity , 2004 .

[17]  Terry Williams,et al.  Why Monte Carlo Simulations of Project Networks Can Mislead , 2004 .

[18]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling with DYNAMO , 1981 .

[19]  Khaled A El-Rayes,et al.  Resource-driven scheduling of repetitive activities , 1998 .

[20]  David Raffo,et al.  Application of a hybrid process simulation model to a software development project , 2001, J. Syst. Softw..

[21]  Simaan M. AbouRizk,et al.  Unified Modeling Methodology for Construction Simulation , 2002 .

[22]  Iris D. Tommelein.  Discrete-Event Simulation of Lean Construction Processes , 1997 .

[23]  Heng Li,et al.  System Dynamics Approach to Exploring Performance Enhancement in a Construction Organization , 2003 .

[24]  A. Alan B. Pritsker,et al.  Introduction to simulation and SLAM II , 1979 .

[25]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[26]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  Hybrid System Dynamics and Discrete Event Simulation for Construction Management , 2007 .