Synthetic cationic amphiphilic α-helical peptides as antimicrobial agents.

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) secreted by the innate immune system are prevalent as the effective first-line of defense to overcome recurring microbial invasions. They have been widely accepted as the blueprints for the development of new antimicrobial agents for the treatment of drug resistant infections. However, there is also a growing concern that AMPs with a sequence that is too close to the host organism's AMP may inevitably compromise its own natural defense. In this study, we design a series of synthetic (non-natural) short α-helical AMPs to expand the arsenal of the AMP families and to gain further insights on their antimicrobial activities. These cationic and amphiphilic peptides have a general sequence of (XXYY)(n) (X: hydrophobic residue, Y: cationic residue, and n: the number of repeat units), and are designed to mimic the folding behavior of the naturally-occurring α-helical AMPs. The synthetic α-helical AMPs with 3 repeat units, (FFRR)(3), (LLRR)(3), and (LLKK)(3), are found to be more selective towards microbial cells than rat red blood cells, with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values that are more than 10 times lower than their 50% hemolytic concentrations (HC(50)). They are effective against Gram-positive B. subtilis and yeast C. albicans; and the studies using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) have elucidated that these peptides possess membrane-lytic activities against microbial cells. Furthermore, non-specific immune stimulation assays of a typical peptide shows negligible IFN-α, IFN-γ, and TNF-α inductions in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, which implies additional safety aspects of the peptide for both systemic and topical use. Therefore, the peptides designed in this study can be promising antimicrobial agents against the frequently-encountered Gram-positive bacteria- or yeast-induced infections.

[1]  F. Crick,et al.  Is α-Keratin a Coiled Coil? , 1952, Nature.

[2]  B. Matthews,et al.  Structural basis of amino acid alpha helix propensity. , 1993, Science.

[3]  M S Sansom,et al.  Simulation studies of the interaction of antimicrobial peptides and lipid bilayers. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[4]  G. Bell,et al.  Arming the enemy: the evolution of resistance to self-proteins. , 2003, Microbiology.

[5]  Weimin Fan,et al.  Self-assembled cationic peptide nanoparticles as an efficient antimicrobial agent. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[6]  A. Ewing,et al.  Sphingomyelin/phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol interactions studied by imaging mass spectrometry. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[7]  J. Lu,et al.  Antibacterial activities of short designer peptides: a link between propensity for nanostructuring and capacity for membrane destabilization. , 2010, Biomacromolecules.

[8]  David F. Williams On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[9]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Controlling the release of peptide antimicrobial agents from surfaces. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[10]  Shaoyi Jiang,et al.  The hydrolysis of cationic polycarboxybetaine esters to zwitterionic polycarboxybetaines with controlled properties. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[11]  Lihong Liu,et al.  Design, syntheses and evaluation of hemocompatible pegylated-antimicrobial polymers with well-controlled molecular structures. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[12]  A. Waring,et al.  The amino-terminal peptide of HIV-1 glycoprotein 41 interacts with human erythrocyte membranes: peptide conformation, orientation and aggregation. , 1992, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[13]  P. Y. Chou,et al.  Empirical predictions of protein conformation. , 1978, Annual review of biochemistry.

[14]  M. Dathe,et al.  Structural features of helical antimicrobial peptides: their potential to modulate activity on model membranes and biological cells. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[15]  A. van Dorsselaer,et al.  A novel inducible antibacterial peptide of Drosophila carries an O-glycosylated substitution. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  H. Scheraga,et al.  The influence of long-range interactions on the structure of myoglobin. , 1968, Biochemistry.

[17]  R. Hancock,et al.  Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Y. Carmeli,et al.  Antibacterial Properties of Dermaseptin S4 Derivatives with In Vivo Activity , 2002, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[19]  R. Nagaraj,et al.  Antibacterial and hemolytic activities of single tryptophan analogs of indolicidin. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[20]  K. Zoon,et al.  Priming of human monocytes for enhanced lipopolysaccharide responses: expression of alpha interferon, interferon regulatory factors, and tumor necrosis factor , 1993, Infection and immunity.

[21]  J. Barber Detergent ringing true as a model for membranes , 1989, Nature.

[22]  Jun Yuan,et al.  A cyclic antimicrobial peptide produced in primate leukocytes by the ligation of two truncated alpha-defensins. , 1999, Science.

[23]  Georg E. Fantner,et al.  Kinetics of Antimicrobial Peptide Activity Measured on Individual Bacterial Cells Using High Speed AFM , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[24]  B. de Kruijff,et al.  The role of the abundant phenylalanines in the mode of action of the antimicrobial peptide clavanin. , 2003, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[25]  Lanjuan Li,et al.  The efficacy of self-assembled cationic antimicrobial peptide nanoparticles against Cryptococcus neoformans for the treatment of meningitis. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[26]  K. Zoon,et al.  Regulation of Interferon Production by Human Monocytes: Requirements for Priming for Lipopolysaccharide‐Induced Production , 1991, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[27]  H. Vogel,et al.  Diversity of antimicrobial peptides and their mechanisms of action. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[28]  John Bartlett Antimicrobial resistance trends and outbreak frequency in united states hospitals , 2004 .

[29]  L. Pauling,et al.  Compound Helical Configurations of Polypeptide Chains: Structure of Proteins of the α-Keratin Type , 1953, Nature.

[30]  J. Deisenhofer,et al.  Detergent structure in crystals of a bacterial photosynthetic reaction centre , 1989, Nature.

[31]  M. Zasloff Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms , 2002, Nature.

[32]  Zhe Wang,et al.  APD: the Antimicrobial Peptide Database , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[33]  R. Hancock,et al.  Clinical development of cationic antimicrobial peptides: from natural to novel antibiotics. , 2002, Current drug targets. Infectious disorders.

[34]  H. Scheraga,et al.  A Method for Predicting Nucleation Sites for Protein Folding Based on Hydrophobic Contacts , 1978 .

[35]  H. Ulvatne,et al.  Bactericidal kinetics of 3 lactoferricins against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases.

[36]  C. Deber,et al.  A measure of helical propensity for amino acids in membrane environments , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[37]  R. Thorpe,et al.  Safety of biologics, lessons learnt from TGN1412. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[38]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  A linguistic model for the rational design of antimicrobial peptides , 2006, Nature.

[39]  D. Hoyt,et al.  Hydrophobic content and lipid interactions of wild-type and mutant OmpA signal peptides correlate with their in vivo function. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[40]  J. Fiddes,et al.  Development of protegrins for the treatment and prevention of oral mucositis: structure-activity relationships of synthetic protegrin analogues. , 2000, Biopolymers.

[41]  J. Feix,et al.  Peptide-membrane interactions and mechanisms of membrane destruction by amphipathic alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides. , 2006, Biochimica et biophysica acta.