Sensitivity of QRS Detection Accuracy to Detector Temporal Resolution

The reliable evaluation of the QRS detection algorithm requires comparability and reproducibility. Although it is commonly accepted to test QRS detection accuracy by standard binary classification parameters, much less attention is paid to the temporal accuracy of the detector. A variety of temporal tolerance values are used in the literature, ranging from 60 ms to 160 ms, which sometimes result in comparison of algorithms with different temporal resolutions. This paper addresses a problem of the dependence of the accuracy of QRS detection algorithms represented by detection error rate, sensitivity, and positive predictive value, on the temporal resolution of the detection defined by Detector Temporal Tolerance (DTT). In this work, the classification statistics achieved for three state-of-the-art low complexity algorithms in a broad range of DTT (from 160 ms to 8 ms) for the entire standard MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database are compared with the performance of the Pan-Tompkins algorithm. The analysis shows that along with decreasing DTT value, the classification statistics for R-peak detection algorithms deteriorate faster or slower with a rate characteristic for a given algorithm. In addition, the algorithms change their positions in the detection accuracy ranking with changing DTT value. The performed analysis proved that DTT is an integral parameter of QRS complex detection that determines the reproducibility of test results and fair comparative study.

[1]  P. Augustyniak,et al.  Real time ECG R-peak detection by extremum sampling , 2020, 2020 6th International Conference on Event-Based Control, Communication, and Signal Processing (EBCCSP).

[2]  José Luis Rojo-Álvarez,et al.  On the Beat Detection Performance in Long-Term ECG Monitoring Scenarios , 2018, Sensors.

[3]  Reza Lotfi,et al.  A Level-Crossing Based QRS-Detection Algorithm for Wearable ECG Sensors , 2014, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[4]  William P. Marnane,et al.  Novel Real-Time Low-Complexity QRS Complex Detector Based on Adaptive Thresholding , 2015, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[5]  Piotr Augustyniak,et al.  RECOVERING THE PRECISE HEART RATE FROM SPARSELY SAMPLED ELECTROCARDIOGRAMS , 1999 .

[6]  Christian Stöcker,et al.  Event-Based Control , 2014 .

[7]  R. Orglmeister,et al.  QRS Detection Using Zero Crossing Counts , 2003 .

[8]  Ivaylo I Christov,et al.  Real time electrocardiogram QRS detection using combined adaptive threshold , 2004, Biomedical engineering online.

[9]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[10]  José Carlos Príncipe,et al.  Integrate and Fire Pulse Train Automaton for QRS detection , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Marek Miśkowicz Reducing Communication by Event-Triggered Sampling , 2018 .

[12]  Björn Eskofier,et al.  Temporal correction of detected R-peaks in ECG signals: A crucial step to improve QRS detection algorithms , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[13]  A. Malliani,et al.  Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use , 1996 .

[14]  Mohamed Elgendi,et al.  Fast QRS Detection with an Optimized Knowledge-Based Method: Evaluation on 11 Standard ECG Databases , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  Willis J. Tompkins,et al.  A Real-Time QRS Detection Algorithm , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Saeed Babaeizadeh,et al.  Can Peak-Picked ECG Be Used for Heart Rate Variability? , 2018, 2018 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC).

[17]  Willis J. Tompkins,et al.  Quantitative Investigation of QRS Detection Rules Using the MIT/BIH Arrhythmia Database , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  R. Smíšek,et al.  Robust QRS Detection Using Combination of Three Independent Methods , 2020, 2020 Computing in Cardiology.