An empirical weight-at-age approach reduces estimation bias compared to modeling parametric growth in integrated, statistical stock assessment models when growth is time varying

Abstract Somatic growth in fishes often varies through time. Despite this, most stock assessments either fix or estimate a time-invariant growth relationship because estimating time-varying growth parameters can be data intensive and subject to multiple sources of bias. Additionally, estimates of growth are often confounded with estimates of selectivity, particularly if selectivity is also time varying. Incorporating empirical weight-at-age (EWAA) information into assessments is a little-studied alternative that accounts for time-varying growth, but foregoes fixing or estimating growth and length–weight relationships. However, this method requires annual measures of fish weights at each age, and missing values must therefore be interpolated. We used Stock Synthesis in a simulation-testing framework to compare the effect of estimating a single time-invariant growth curve, time-varying growth curves, and incorporating EWAA information on management quantities and parameter estimates. We ran simulations across two fish life histories (hake-like and rockfish-like) and three data cases (data-rich, data-rich with a late-starting survey, and data-moderate). We found that when growth was time invariant, the EWAA approach was unbiased but had twice the median average relative error compared to a model that estimated growth from age and length data. However, for data-rich cases with time-varying growth, the EWAA method resulted in more accurate estimates of spawning stock biomass compared to the approach that estimated time-invariant and time-varying growth parameters, as evidenced by at least a five-fold reduction in range of median relative errors. The magnitude of this effect was greatest for the long-lived, slow-growing life history. For the relatively fast-growing species, estimates from the EWAA method were particularly sensitive to interpolating missing values.

[1]  D. Pearson,et al.  Age sample sizes and their effects on growth estimation and stock assessment outputs: Three case studies from U.S. West Coast fisheries , 2016 .

[2]  I. J. Stewart,et al.  Stock Assessment of Pacific Hake, Merluccius productus, (a.k.a. Whiting) in U.S. and Canadian Waters in 2010 , 2010 .

[3]  Richard D. Methot,et al.  Stock synthesis: A biological and statistical framework for fish stock assessment and fishery management , 2013 .

[4]  John Sibert,et al.  AD Model Builder: using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear models , 2012, Optim. Methods Softw..

[5]  Steven J. D. Martell,et al.  Assessment of the Pacifi c halibut stock at the end of 2013 , 2012 .

[6]  André E. Punt,et al.  Time-varying natural mortality in fisheries stock assessment models: identifying a default approach , 2015 .

[7]  G. Boeuf,et al.  Does light have an influence on fish growth , 1999 .

[8]  J. Thorson,et al.  Random effect estimation of time-varying factors in Stock Synthesis , 2014 .

[9]  Y. Jiao,et al.  Incorporating temporal variation in the growth of red abalone (Haliotis rufescens) using hierarchical Bayesian growth models , 2010 .

[10]  Ian G. Taylor,et al.  The effect of length bin width on growth estimation in integrated age-structured stock assessments , 2016 .

[11]  M. Mangel,et al.  Estimating von Bertalanffy parameters with individual and environmental variations in growth , 2012, Journal of biological dynamics.

[12]  J. Thorson,et al.  Gear selectivity and sample size effects on growth curve selection in shark age and growth studies , 2009 .

[13]  G. Boeuf,et al.  How should salinity influence fish growth? , 2001, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP.

[14]  Sean C. Anderson,et al.  ss3sim: An R Package for Fisheries Stock Assessment Simulation with Stock Synthesis , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  G. Jones,et al.  Food availability affects growth in a coral reef fish , 1986, Oecologia.

[16]  C. Phillip Goodyear,et al.  Mean Size at Age: An Evaluation of Sampling Strategies with Simulated Red Grouper Data , 1995 .

[17]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Is Research on Environmental Factors Useful to Fisheries Management , 1988 .

[18]  J. Thorson,et al.  Relative magnitude of cohort, age, and year effects on size at age of exploited marine fishes , 2016 .

[19]  R. Day,et al.  Accounting for cohort-specific variable growth in fisheries stock assessments: A case study from south-eastern Australia , 2013 .

[20]  John M. Hoenig,et al.  Direct estimates of gear selectivity from multiple tagging experiments , 1997 .

[21]  J. Schnute,et al.  A New Approach to Length–Frequency Analysis: Growth Structure , 1980 .

[22]  Kirstin K. Holsman,et al.  Assessment of the walleye pollock stock in the Eastern Bering Sea , 2016 .

[23]  Clyde C. Taylor,et al.  Cod Growth and Temperature , 1958 .