Does the Finger-to-Nose Test measure upper limb coordination in chronic stroke?

BackgroundWe aimed to kinematically validate that the time to perform the Finger-to-Nose Test (FNT) assesses coordination by determining its construct, convergent and discriminant validity.MethodsExperimental, criterion standard study. Both clinical and experimental evaluations were done at a research facility in a rehabilitation hospital. Forty individuals (20 individuals with chronic stroke and 20 healthy, age- and gender-matched individuals) participated.. Both groups performed two blocks of 10 to-and-fro pointing movements (non-dominant/affected arm) between a sagittal target and the nose (ReachIn, ReachOut) at a self-paced speed. Time to perform the test was the main outcome. Kinematics (Optotrak, 100Hz) and clinical impairment/activity levels were evaluated. Spatiotemporal coordination was assessed with slope (IJC) and cross-correlation (LAG) between elbow and shoulder movements.ResultsCompared to controls, individuals with stroke (Fugl-Meyer Assessment, FMA-UE: 51.9 ± 13.2; Box & Blocks, BBT: 72.1 ± 26.9%) made more curved endpoint trajectories using less shoulder horizontal-abduction. For construct validity, shoulder range (β = 0.127), LAG (β = 0.855) and IJC (β = −0.191) explained 82% of FNT-time variance for ReachIn and LAG (β = 0.971) explained 94% for ReachOut in patients with stroke. In contrast, only LAG explained 62% (β = 0.790) and 79% (β = 0.889) of variance for ReachIn and ReachOut respectively in controls. For convergent validity, FNT-time correlated with FMA-UE (r = −0.67, p < 0.01), FMA-Arm (r = −0.60, p = 0.005), biceps spasticity (r = 0.39, p < 0.05) and BBT (r = −0.56, p < 0.01). A cut-off time of 10.6 s discriminated between mild and moderate-to-severe impairment (discriminant validity). Each additional second represented 42% odds increase of greater impairment.ConclusionsFor this version of the FNT, the time to perform the test showed construct, convergent and discriminant validity to measure UL coordination in stroke.

[1]  J. Kelso,et al.  Coordination Dynamics: Issues and Trends , 2004, Understanding Complex Systems.

[2]  J. Desrosiers,et al.  Standardized Finger-Nose Test Validity for Coordination Assessment in an Ataxic Disorder , 2004, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[3]  J. Dewald,et al.  Shoulder abduction-induced reductions in reaching work area following hemiparetic stroke: neuroscientific implications , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Control of reaching movements by muscle synergy combinations , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[5]  M. Levin,et al.  Compensatory Versus Noncompensatory Shoulder Movements Used for Reaching in Stroke , 2016, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[6]  Rebecca S Schaefer,et al.  Auditory rhythmic cueing in movement rehabilitation: findings and possible mechanisms , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Pamela W. Duncan,et al.  Similar Motor Recovery of Upper and Lower Extremities After Stroke , 1994, Stroke.

[8]  Rita R. Hohlstein,et al.  Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction (3rd ed.) , 1990 .

[9]  N. A. Bernshteĭn.  The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[10]  J. Dewald,et al.  Augmenting Clinical Evaluation of Hemiparetic Arm Movement With a Laboratory-Based Quantitative Measurement of Kinematics as a Function of Limb Loading , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[11]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  Control variables and proprioceptive feedback in fast single-joint movement. , 1995, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[12]  S. J. Sullivan,et al.  Reliability of the scores for the finger-to-nose test in adults with traumatic brain injury. , 1993, Physical therapy.

[13]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[14]  W. Helsen,et al.  Intention tremor rated according to different finger-to-nose test protocols: a survey. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  K. Lashley.  The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .

[16]  V. Feigin,et al.  Review and prioritization of stroke research recommendations to address the mission of the World Stroke Organization: a call to action from the WSO Research Committee , 2015, International Journal of Stroke.

[17]  C. A. Trombly,et al.  Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction , 1989 .

[18]  Sandeep K Subramanian,et al.  Validity of Movement Pattern Kinematics as Measures of Arm Motor Impairment Poststroke , 2010, Stroke.

[19]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Directional control of reaching is preserved following mild/moderate stroke and stochastically constrained following severe stroke , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  T. Twitchell.  The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. , 1951, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  M. Levin,et al.  What Do Motor “Recovery” and “Compensation” Mean in Patients Following Stroke? , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[22]  E. Skargren,et al.  Improvement and impact of initial motor skill after intensive rehabilitation – CI-therapy in patients with chronic hemiplegia. A follow-up study , 2006 .

[23]  W. Rymer,et al.  Target-dependent differences between free and constrained arm movements in chronic hemiparesis , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  M. Latash,et al.  Motor Control Strategies Revealed in the Structure of Motor Variability , 2002, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[25]  M. Levin,et al.  Relief of hemiparetic spasticity by TENS is associated with improvement in reflex and voluntary motor functions. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  W. Jonas.  Dictionary of Complementary and Alternative Medicine , 2005 .

[27]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  R. E. Lrvine.  Movement Therapy in Hemiplegia: A Neurophysiological Approach , 1972 .

[29]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor control , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  P. S. Archambault,et al.  Control of double-joint arm posture in adults with unilateral brain damage , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Lorraine Williams Pedretti,et al.  Occupational Therapy: Practice Skills for Physical Dysfunction , 1985 .

[32]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[33]  A R Henderson,et al.  Assessing Test Accuracy and its Clinical Consequences: A Primer for Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis , 1993, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[34]  J. Paillard.  Motor and representational framing of space , 1991 .

[35]  P. Dyhre‐Poulsen,et al.  The influence of experimentally induced pain on shoulder muscle activity , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  The role of kinematic redundancy in adaptation of reaching , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  Winifred Schultz-Krohn PhD Otr,et al.  Occupational Therapy: Practice Skills for Physical Dysfunction , 2001 .

[38]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Review: Toward a Better Understanding of Coordination in Healthy and Poststroke Gait , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[39]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Panayiota Poirazi,et al.  Computational modeling of the effects of amyloid-beta on release probability at hippocampal synapses , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[41]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  Arm–Trunk Coordination for Beyond-the-Reach Movements in Adults With Stroke , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.