Age- and Sex-Related Variations in the Brain White Matter Fractal Dimension Throughout Adulthood: An MRI Study

PurposeTo observe age- and sex-related differences in the complexity of the global and hemispheric white matter (WM) throughout adulthood by means of fractal dimension (FD).MethodsA box-counting algorithm was used to extract FD from the WM magnetic resonance images of 209 healthy adults from three structural layers, including general (gFD), skeleton (sFD), and boundaries (bFD). Model selection algorithms and statistical analyses, respectively, were used to examine the patterns and significance of the changes.ResultsgFD and sFD showed inverse U-shape patterns with aging, with a slighter slope of increase from young to mid-age and a steeper decrease to the old. bFD was less affected by age. Sex differences were evident, specifically in gFD and sFD, with men showing higher FDs. Age × sex interaction was significant mainly in the hemispheric analysis, with men undergoing sharper age-related changes. After adjusting for the volume effect, age-related results remained approximately the same, but sex differences changed in most of the features, with women indicating higher values, specifically in the left hemisphere and boundaries. Right hemisphere was still more complex in men.ConclusionsThis study is the first that investigates the WM FD spanning adulthood, treating age both as a continuous and categorical variable. We found positive correlations between FD and volume, and our results show similarities with those investigating small-world properties of the brain networks, as well as those of functional complexity and WM integrity. These suggest that FD could yield a highly compact description of the structural changes and also might inform us about functional and cognitive variations.

[1]  C. Jack,et al.  Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative , 2008 .

[2]  Jing Z. Liu,et al.  A three-dimensional fractal analysis method for quantifying white matter structure in human brain , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  Soon Beom Hong,et al.  Fractal dimension in human cortical surface: Multiple regression analysis with cortical thickness, sulcal depth, and folding area , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Brandon Brown,et al.  Fractal dimension analysis of the cortical ribbon in mild Alzheimer's disease , 2010, NeuroImage.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Unified segmentation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[6]  P. Yakovlev,et al.  The myelogenetic cycles of regional maturation of the brain , 1967 .

[7]  B. Turetsky,et al.  Sex Differences in Brain Gray and White Matter in Healthy Young Adults: Correlations with Cognitive Performance , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  S. W. Nelson,et al.  Department of radiology , 1966 .

[9]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Relationship between white matter fractional anisotropy and other indices of cerebral health in normal aging: Tract-based spatial statistics study of aging , 2007, NeuroImage.

[10]  G. Bartzokis,et al.  White matter structural integrity in healthy aging adults and patients with Alzheimer disease: a magnetic resonance imaging study. , 2003, Archives of neurology.

[11]  E. Edgington,et al.  Randomization Tests (3rd ed.) , 1998 .

[12]  Arno Klein,et al.  Mindboggle: a scatterbrained approach to automate brain labeling , 2005, NeuroImage.

[13]  Fabrice Crivello,et al.  Age- and sex-related effects on the neuroanatomy of healthy elderly , 2005, NeuroImage.

[14]  M. Ahmadlou,et al.  Brain activity of women is more fractal than men , 2013, Neuroscience Letters.

[15]  Faith M. Gunning-Dixon,et al.  Aging of cerebral white matter: a review of MRI findings , 2009, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[16]  B. Mandelbrot How Long Is the Coast of Britain? Statistical Self-Similarity and Fractional Dimension , 1967, Science.

[17]  Tao Wang,et al.  A note on 'A fully parallel 3D thinning algorithm and its applications' , 2007, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[18]  Yulin Ge,et al.  Age-related total gray matter and white matter changes in normal adult brain. Part II: quantitative magnetization transfer ratio histogram analysis. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[19]  A. Kalauzi,et al.  Modeling EEG fractal dimension changes in wake and drowsy states in humans--a preliminary study. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[21]  Roberto Hornero,et al.  The correlation between white-matter microstructure and the complexity of spontaneous brain activity: A difussion tensor imaging-MEG study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[22]  Gordon D. Waiter,et al.  Brain structural complexity and life course cognitive change , 2012, NeuroImage.

[23]  Yong He,et al.  Hemisphere- and gender-related differences in small-world brain networks: A resting-state functional MRI study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[24]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[25]  Eugene S. Edgington,et al.  Randomization Tests , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[26]  E. Gordon,et al.  Cognitive aging, executive function, and fractional anisotropy: a diffusion tensor MR imaging study. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[27]  John Ashburner,et al.  A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm , 2007, NeuroImage.

[28]  Lars-Göran Nilsson,et al.  High Prevalence of White Matter Hyperintensities in Normal Aging: Relation to Blood Pressure and Cognition , 2003, Cortex.

[29]  Guang H. Yue,et al.  Quantifying degeneration of white matter in normal aging using fractal dimension , 2007, Neurobiology of Aging.

[30]  Eileen Luders,et al.  Gender differences in cortical complexity , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Jong-Min Lee,et al.  Fractal dimension of cerebral cortical surface in schizophrenia and obsessive–compulsive disorder , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A Voxel-Based Morphometric Study of Ageing in 465 Normal Adult Human Brains , 2001, NeuroImage.

[33]  Joaquín Goñi,et al.  Fractal dimension and white matter changes in multiple sclerosis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[34]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  Age‐related changes in topological organization of structural brain networks in healthy individuals , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[35]  Nacim Betrouni,et al.  Fractal and multifractal analysis: A review , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[36]  O. Sporns Small-world connectivity, motif composition, and complexity of fractal neuronal connections. , 2006, Bio Systems.

[37]  Mariano Sigman,et al.  The Conundrum of Functional Brain Networks: Small-World Efficiency or Fractal Modularity , 2012, Front. Physio..

[38]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Fractal dimension of electroencephalographic time series and underlying brain processes , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[39]  E. Ott,et al.  Dimension of Strange Attractors , 1980 .

[40]  D. Abásolo,et al.  Brain oscillatory complexity across the life span , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[41]  A. Minkowski,et al.  Regional Development of the Brain in Early Life , 1968 .

[42]  C. Hamilton,et al.  Cognition and sex differences , 2008 .

[43]  Daniel J. Miller,et al.  Prolonged myelination in human neocortical evolution , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Yaakov Stern,et al.  Structural MRI covariance patterns associated with normal aging and neuropsychological functioning , 2007, Neurobiology of Aging.