Effect of a hands-free wire on specific absorption rate for a waist-mounted 1.8 GHz cellular telephone handset.

A common feature of cellular telephony is the use of a 'hands-free' audio extension lead connected to a waist-worn handset. Interaction between the transmitting antenna, the wire and the user's body can occur, with detrimental effects including polar pattern degradation, reduced efficiency and localized increases in specific absorption rate (SAR). Using a realistic full-body model of an adult male, finite difference time domain analysis was employed to investigate the coupling between a hip-mounted 1.8 GHz handset fitted with a monopole antenna and a 1 m long wire representing a hands-free wire. Conduction current densities were computed for three identifiable coupling modes: magnetic-only, conductive-only and combined conductive-and-magnetic. Magnetic-only coupling was dominant. Without the lead, placing the handset at waist height led to a 42.8% increase in the total energy deposited in the body, compared to use at the head. Introducing the lead further increased the body loss, with a reduction in system radiation efficiency from 52% to 43.7%. Without the hands-free lead, the peak 1 g and 10 g SARs were 0.450 W kg(-1) and 0.265 W kg(-1), respectively, for 125 mW transmit power. With the hands-free lead connected, these values increased to 1.14 W kg(-1) and 0.430 W kg(-1), respectively.

[1]  William Scanlon,et al.  Numerical analysis of bodyworn UHF antenna systems , 2001 .

[2]  James C. Lin.  Specific absorption rates (SARs) induced in head tissues by microwave radiation from cell phones , 2000 .

[3]  A. Faraone,et al.  Estimation of the SAR in the Human Head and Body due to Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure from Handheld Mobile Phones with Hands-Free Accessories , 2003, Radiation research.

[4]  O. Gandhi,et al.  Temperature rise for the human head for cellular telephones and for peak SARs prescribed in safety guidelines , 2001, 2001 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Sympsoium Digest (Cat. No.01CH37157).

[5]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[6]  Jesper Ødum Nielsen,et al.  In-network evaluation of body-carried mobile terminal performance , 2001, 12th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications. PIMRC 2001. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8598).

[7]  William Scanlon,et al.  Location dependency and antenna /body/sensor-lead interaction effects in a cell-phone based GSM 1800 telemedicine link , 2001, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  David H. Sliney,et al.  Health issues related to the use of hand-held radiotelephones and base transmitters. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. , 1996, Health physics.

[9]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  M. Stuchly,et al.  A study of the handset antenna and human body interaction , 1996 .

[11]  Huey-Ru Chuang.  Human operator coupling effects on radiation characteristics of a portable communication dipole antenna , 1994 .

[12]  P. Dimbylow,et al.  SAR calculations in an anatomically realistic model of the head for mobile communication transceivers at 900 MHz and 1.8 GHz. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Gang Kang,et al.  SARs for pocket-mounted mobile telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  J. Toftgard,et al.  Effects on Portable Antennas by the Presence of a Person , 1993 .

[15]  Osamu Fujiwara,et al.  Characteristics of the SAR distributions in a head exposed to electromagnetic fields radiated by a hand-held portable radio , 1996 .