Acellular dermal matrix seeded with autologous gingival fibroblasts for the treatment of gingival recession: a proof-of-concept study.

BACKGROUND One of the most common esthetic concerns associated with periodontal tissues is gingival recession. There are multiple periodontal plastic surgery approaches documented in the literature for the treatment of such defects. With the tremendous advances being made in periodontal science and technology, tissue engineering could be considered among the latest exciting techniques for recession management. METHODS In this split-mouth, controlled, double-masked clinical case series, 20 sites from 10 patients with Miller Class I or II recessions affecting canines or premolars in the maxillary arch were selected. One tooth in each patient was randomized to receive either a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) (control group) or an acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADMA) seeded with autologous gingival fibroblasts (test group) under a coronally positioned flap. Clinical parameters, including recession depth, probing depth, clinical attachment level, width of keratinized tissue, attached gingiva, and plaque scores, were recorded by a calibrated examiner at baseline and 3 and 6 months. The inflammation of grafted sites was scored, and the healing time was calculated. The final esthetic outcome of treated sites was assessed by the root coverage esthetic score at the end of 6 months. RESULTS There were no significant differences between test and control sites for all measured clinical parameters. However, the test sites demonstrated less inflammation in the early postoperative period. CONCLUSION Within the limits of this case series, the results indicate that an ADMA seeded with autologous gingival fibroblasts by tissue-engineering technology may be explored as a substitute to an SCTG for the treatment of Miller Class I and II recession defects.

[1]  G. Pini Prato,et al.  Root coverage esthetic score: a system to evaluate the esthetic outcome of the treatment of gingival recession through evaluation of clinical cases. , 2009, Journal of periodontology.

[2]  P. Lavin,et al.  A Pilot Study to Evaluate a Tissue-Engineered Bilayered Cell Therapy as an Alternative to Tissue From the Palate , 2008 .

[3]  G. Zucchelli,et al.  Bilaminar technique in the treatment of a deep cervical abrasion defect. , 2008, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[4]  M. Shokrgozar,et al.  Culture of human gingival fibroblasts on a biodegradable scaffold and evaluation of its effect on attached gingiva: a randomized, controlled pilot study. , 2007, The Journal of Periodontology.

[5]  J. Marchesan,et al.  Effect of in vitro gingival fibroblast seeding on the in vivo incorporation of acellular dermal matrix allografts in dogs. , 2007, Journal of periodontology.

[6]  B. Boyan,et al.  A 2-year follow-up of root coverage using sub-pedicle acellular dermal matrix allografts and subepithelial connective tissue autografts. , 2005, Journal of periodontology.

[7]  M. Nunn,et al.  Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of periodontal applications of a living tissue-engineered human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute. II. Comparison to the subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled feasibility study. , 2005, Journal of periodontology.

[8]  M. Nunn,et al.  Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of periodontal applications of a living tissue-engineered human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute. I. Comparison to the gingival autograft: a randomized controlled pilot study. , 2005, Journal of periodontology.

[9]  N. Lang,et al.  Coverage of localized gingival recessions: comparison of micro- and macrosurgical techniques. , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[10]  E. Allen,et al.  Histologic evaluation of autogenous connective tissue and acellular dermal matrix grafts in humans. , 2005, Journal of periodontology.

[11]  R. Sheridan,et al.  Fibroblasts improve performance of cultured composite skin substitutes on athymic mice. , 2004, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[12]  Randall J. Harris A short-term and long-term comparison of root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix and a subepithelial graft. , 2004, Journal of periodontology.

[13]  C. Soranzo,et al.  An autologous cell hyaluronic acid graft technique for gingival augmentation: a case series. , 2003, Journal of periodontology.

[14]  M. Sanz,et al.  Periodontal plastic surgery for treatment of localized gingival recessions: a systematic review. , 2002, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[15]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Culture of primary human gingival fibroblasts on biodegradable membranes. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[16]  A. B. Novaes,et al.  Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession. , 2001, Journal of periodontology.

[17]  M. Lingen,et al.  Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 1. A clinical study. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[18]  Harris Rj A comparative study of root coverage obtained with an acellular dermal matrix versus a connective tissue graft: results of 107 recession defects in 50 consecutively treated patients. , 2000 .

[19]  M. Hürzeler,et al.  A single-incision technique to harvest subepithelial connective tissue grafts from the palate. , 1999, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[20]  J. Wennström,et al.  Increased gingival dimensions. A significant factor for successful outcome of root coverage procedures? A 2-year prospective clinical study. , 1996, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[21]  J. Hansbrough,et al.  Current concepts in the development of cultured skin replacements. , 1996, The Journal of surgical research.

[22]  R. Harris The connective tissue and partial thickness double pedicle graft: a predictable method of obtaining root coverage. , 1992, Journal of periodontology.

[23]  N. Ross,et al.  A modified gingival index for use in clinical trials. , 1986, Clinical preventive dentistry.

[24]  B. Langer,et al.  Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. , 1985, Journal of periodontology.

[25]  P. Raetzke Covering localized areas of root exposure employing the "envelope" technique. , 1985, Journal of periodontology.

[26]  P. Miller,et al.  A classification of marginal tissue recession. , 1985, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[27]  J. Bernimoulin,et al.  Coronally repositioned periodontal flap. Clinical evaluation after one year. , 1975, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[28]  Sullivan Hc,et al.  Free autogenous gingival grafts: III. Utilization of grafts in the treatment of gingival recession , 1968 .

[29]  S E Ross,et al.  The double papillae repositioned flap in periodontal therapy. , 1968, Journal of periodontology.

[30]  H. Löe,et al.  PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN PREGNANCY. II. CORRELATION BETWEEN ORAL HYGIENE AND PERIODONTAL CONDTION. , 1964, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[31]  H. Grupe,et al.  Repair of Gingival Defects by a Sliding Flap Operation , 1956 .