The Dry Port Concept

Environmental problems have received increasing attention during the last decade and with them also the role that logistics systems can play in reducing the environmental impact; however, logistics concepts in the role of decreasing environmental impacts have not been extensively researched until recently. One of these concepts is a concept of dry port, which is the focus of this thesis. The purpose of this thesis is to define the dry port concept and to develop the same through identification of its impacts as well as factors that influence the implementation of the concept. The dry port concept is based on a seaport directly connected by rail to inland intermodal terminals, where shippers can leave and/or collect their goods in intermodal loading units as if directly at the seaport. With dry port implementation CO2 emissions should decrease, queues and long waiting times at seaport terminals should be avoided, and the risk of road accidents should reduce. Besides the general benefits to the ecological environment and the quality of life by shifting flows from road to rail, the dry port concept increases the seaports’ throughput without physical port expansion. It also brings a competitive advantage to a seaport since it improves the seaport’s access to areas outside its traditional hinterland. This is closely related to regional development that results from the establishment of new businesses in the area once the necessary logistics infrastructure is in place, by means of dry ports. Although the concept of a dry port should bring numerous benefits to the actors of the transport system, there are still many impediments to the implementation of the same; land use, infrastructure and institutional impediments are identified as the most common. Therefore, a dry port must fit into the transport system where regulations are designed to optimize the use as well as the development of existing infrastructure and its belonging modes of transport.

[1]  E. Ziegel,et al.  A dictionary of statistical terms. , 1991 .

[2]  Dominique Peeters,et al.  Modelling a rail/road intermodal transportation system , 2004 .

[3]  Olli-Pekka Hilmola,et al.  Using Eurasian Landbridge in Logistics Operations : Building Knowledge through Case Studies , 2007 .

[4]  José Holguín-Veras,et al.  Implementation of Priority Systems for Containers at Marine Intermodal Terminals , 1997 .

[5]  Anna Sciomachen,et al.  Intermodal container flows in a port system network:: Analysis of possible growths via simulation models , 2005 .

[6]  John Golias,et al.  Comparative evaluation of existing and innovative rail-road freight transport terminals , 2002 .

[7]  R. McCalla,et al.  Factors Influencing the Landward Movement of Containers: The Cases of Halifax and Vancouver , 2007 .

[8]  A. Ballis,et al.  A CONTAINER TERMINAL SIMULATION MODEL WITH ANIMATION CAPABILITIES , 1996 .

[9]  Lawrence Henesey,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for Container Terminal Management , 2006 .

[10]  Peter Bernard Marlow,et al.  Fourth generation ports – a question of agility? , 2003 .

[11]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  ECONOMIES OF SCALE IN LARGE CONTAINERSHIPS: OPTIMAL SIZE AND GEOGRAPHICAL IMPLICATIONS. , 2000 .

[12]  Johan Woxenius,et al.  The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland , 2009 .

[13]  J. W. Konings,et al.  INTEGRATED CENTRES FOR THE TRANSSHIPMENT, STORAGE, COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF GOODS: A SURVEY OF THE POSSIBILITIES FOR A HIGH- QUALITY INTERMODAL TRANSPORT CONCEPT. , 1996 .

[14]  M. C. Moura O,et al.  Ship assignment with hub and spoke constraints , 2002 .

[15]  Johan Woxenius,et al.  Terminals - a Barrier for Intermodality? , 1997 .

[16]  H. Arjen van Klink,et al.  Gateways and intermodalism , 1998 .

[17]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  Coping with Congestion: Understanding the Gap Between Policy Assumptions and Behavior , 1997 .

[18]  B. Slack,et al.  Strategic alliances in the container shipping industry: a global perspective , 2002 .

[19]  R. Robinson Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm , 2002 .

[20]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Simulation modelling and analysis , 1991 .

[21]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Simulation Modeling & Analysis , 1991 .

[22]  Håkan Aronsson,et al.  The environmental impact of changing logistics structures , 2006 .

[23]  B. Slack Satellite terminals: a local solution to hub congestion? , 1999 .

[24]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Inland Freight Distribution and the Sub-harborization of Port Terminals , 2004 .

[25]  Peter W. de Langen,et al.  Hinterland access regimes in seaports , 2003, Les Cahiers Scientifiques du Transport - Scientific Papers in Transportation.

[26]  A Van Klink OPTIMISATION OF LAND ACCESS TO SEA PORTS: BEYOND INFRASTRUCTURE , 2001 .

[27]  Violeta Roso,et al.  Evaluation of the dry port concept from an environmental perspective: A note , 2007 .

[28]  Ben J. C. M. Rutten The design of a terminal network for intermodal transport , 1998 .

[29]  Olli-Pekka Hilmola,et al.  Deregulation of railroads and future development scenarios in Europe: analysis of the privatisation process taken place in the USA, the UK and Sweden , 2007 .

[30]  Johan Woxenius,et al.  Distributed Function Hinterland: Interface Design for the Coordination of Container Freight Services , 2007 .

[31]  A. Pellegram STRATEGIC LAND USE PLANNING FOR FREIGHT: THE EXPERIENCE OF THE PORT OF LONDON AUTHORITY, 1994--1999 , 2001 .

[32]  Johan Woxenius,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL-SCALE INTERMODAL FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION IN A SYSTEMS CONTEXT , 1998 .

[33]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  Consolidation and contestability in the European container handling industry , 2002 .

[34]  H. Meersman,et al.  Co-operation and competition in international container transport: strategies for ports , 2001 .

[35]  B. Slack,et al.  INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION IN NORTH AMERICA AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF INLAND LOAD CENTERS , 1990 .

[36]  Violeta Roso The Emergence and Significance of Dry Ports: The Case of the Port of Goteborg , 2009 .

[37]  Yehuda Hayuth,et al.  Spatial characteristics of transportation hubs: centrality and intermediacy , 1994 .

[38]  Johan Woxenius,et al.  The Dry Port Concept - Connecting Seaports with their Hinterland by Rail , 2004 .

[39]  Dimitrios A Tsamboulas,et al.  Appraisal of investments in European nodal centres for goods – freight villages: A comparative analysis , 1999 .

[40]  Robert J. McCalla,et al.  GLOBAL CHANGE, LOCAL PAIN: INTERMODAL SEAPORT TERMINALS AND THEIR SERVICE AREAS , 1999 .

[41]  Johan Albrecht,et al.  Tradable CO2 permits for cars and trucks , 2001 .

[42]  Erhan Kozan,et al.  Optimising container transfers at multimodal terminals , 2000 .

[43]  Jonathan D Eldredge,et al.  Inventory of research methods for librarianship and informatics. , 2004, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[44]  Diana Burton,et al.  Best Practice Case Studies: Evolving Research Approaches1 , 2005 .

[45]  Arsham Mazaheri,et al.  Impacts of the ISPS code on port activities: a case study on Swedish ports , 2009 .

[46]  Erhan Kozan,et al.  Optimum Capacity for Intermodal Container Terminals , 2006 .

[47]  P. Hanappe Plates-formes de fret, centres de logistique, ports secs , 1986 .

[48]  P. Niérat,et al.  Market area of rail-truck terminals: Pertinence of the spatial theory , 1997 .

[49]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  Is intermodal freight transport more environmentally friendly than all-road freight transport? A review , 2003 .

[50]  Violeta Roso A review of dry ports - Characteristics, driving forces and impediments , 2009 .

[51]  Violeta Roso Factors influencing implementation of a dry port , 2008 .

[52]  T. Notteboom,et al.  Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge? , 2001 .

[53]  Amelia C. Regan,et al.  Freight industry attitudes towards policies to reduce congestion , 2000 .

[54]  Alfred J. Baird,et al.  The Economics of Container Transhipment in Northern Europe , 2002 .

[55]  Kenth Lumsden,et al.  THE DRY PORT CONCEPT- MOVING SEAPORT ACTIVITIES INLAND? , 2009 .

[56]  Raymond K. Cheung,et al.  The transition from freight consolidation to logistics: the case of Hong Kong , 2003 .

[57]  R N Zimmer DESIGNING INTERMODAL TERMINALS FOR EFFICIENCY , 1996 .

[58]  Danny Samson,et al.  Effective case research in operations management: a process perspective , 2002 .

[59]  T E Notteboom,et al.  SPATIAL AND FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION OF CONTAINER PORT SYSTEMS AND HINTERLAND NETWORKS IN EUROPE , 2001 .

[60]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Case research in operations management , 2002 .

[61]  Violeta Roso Emergence and Significance of Dry Ports , 2007 .

[62]  Jacques Leonardi,et al.  CO2 efficiency in road freight transportation: Status quo, measures and potential , 2004 .

[63]  Peter W Cardebring,et al.  COMBI-TERMINAL AND INTERMODAL FREIGHT CENTRE DEVELOPMENT: AN ASSESSMENT. , 1995 .

[64]  Girish Gujar,et al.  The spatial characteristics of inland transport hubs: evidences from Southern India , 2009 .