The effect of earned and paid media strategies in high visibility enforcement campaigns.

The primary objective of this paper is to describe the impact of national seat belt enforcement mobilizations in terms of changes in public awareness, perceptions, and opinions as they relate to Operation ABC (Always Buckle Up). In order to monitor changes in public awareness and perceptions, a number of national telephone surveys were conducted. Survey results indicated that the following characteristics were associated with lower self-reported seat belt use rates: (a) males; (b) 18-34 age group; (c) persons with lower income; (d) persons with lower education; (e) persons living in rural areas; (f) residents of the Northeast, Midwest, and Great Lakes; (g) residents of states with secondary enforcement laws; and (h) persons less likely to read a newspaper and more likely to listen to the radio. Telephone surveys also suggested that the following groups are more likely to fail to properly secure a child under 12: (a) persons who say they have problems securing a child in seat belt; (b) farm belt residents; (c) Hispanic and Latinos; (d) persons who indicate that they always wear a seat belt but indicate they have not in the past month; (e) persons with older vehicles; (f) lower income respondents; (g) residents of the Deep South; (h) internet non-users; and (i) urban men. These findings provide support for some basic guidelines and suggestions for conducting seat belt enforcement activities.

[1]  Donna Glassbrenner,et al.  Recent estimates of safety belt use. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[2]  Rudolf G. Mortimer,et al.  EFFECTS OF INCENTIVES AND ENFORCEMENT ON THE USE OF SEAT BELTS BY DRIVERS , 1990 .

[3]  Randy W. Elder,et al.  Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to increase the use of safety belts. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[4]  D F Preusser,et al.  OCCUPANT PROTECTION SPECIAL TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM EVALUATION , 1999 .

[5]  A. Williams,et al.  Seat belt use law enforcement and publicity in Elmira, New York: a reminder campaign. , 1987, American journal of public health.

[6]  Brian A. Jonah,et al.  EFFECTS OF A SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM ON SEAT BELT USAGE , 1982 .

[7]  Kaye Sullivan,et al.  Where Are All the Children Seated and When Are They Restrained , 1997 .

[8]  J Boyle,et al.  1996 MOTOR VEHICLE OCCUPANT SAFETY SURVEY, VOLUME 3: SEAT BELTS , 1997 .

[9]  Allan F. Williams,et al.  Increasing seat belt use in North Carolina , 1996 .

[10]  D Glassbrenner,et al.  SAFETY BELT AND HELMET USE IN 2002 - OVERALL RESULTS , 2002 .

[11]  A K Lund,et al.  Results of a seat belt use law enforcement and publicity campaign in Elmira, New York. , 1987, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Allan F. Williams,et al.  Development and evaluation of pilot programs to increase seat belt use in North Carolina , 1994 .

[13]  David F. Preusser,et al.  EVALUATION OF CLICK IT OR TICKET MODEL PROGRAMS , 2002 .

[14]  D Glassbrenner,et al.  THE USE OF CHILD RESTRAINTS IN 2002 , 2003 .

[15]  B A Jonah,et al.  Long-term effectiveness of selective traffic enforcement programs for increasing seat belt use. , 1985, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  Adrian K. Lund,et al.  Special publicity and enforcement of California's belt use law: Making a “secondary” law work , 1989 .

[17]  F M Streff,et al.  Increasing safety belt use in a secondary enforcement state: evaluation of a three-county special enforcement program. , 1992, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  E S Geller,et al.  A Statewide Intervention to Increase Safety Belt Use: Adding to the Impact of a Belt Use Law , 1994, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[19]  B J Campbell,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP OF SEAT BELT LAW ENFORCEMENT TO LEVEL OF BELT USE , 1987 .

[20]  B. J. Campbell,et al.  The association between enforcement and seat belt use , 1988 .