Risk-based Process Development of Biosimilars as Part of the Quality by Design Paradigm

In the last few years, several quality by design (QbD) studies demonstrated the benefit of systematic approaches for biopharmaceutical development. However, only very few studies identified biosimilars as a special case of product development. The targeted quality profile of biosimilars is strictly defined by the originator's product characteristic. Moreover, the major source of prior knowledge is the experience with the originator product itself. Processing this information in biosimilar development has a major effect on risk management and process development strategies. The main objective of this contribution is to demonstrate how risk management can facilitate the implementation of QbD in early-stage product development with special emphasis on fitting the reported approaches to biosimilars. Risk assessments were highlighted as important tools to integrate prior knowledge in biosimilar development. The risk assessment process as suggested by the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH Q9) was reviewed and three elements were identified to play a key role in targeted risk assessment approaches: proper understanding of target linkage, risk assessment tool compliance, and criticality threshold value. Adjusting these steps to biosimilar applications helped to address some unique challenges of these products such as a strictly defined quality profile or a lack of process knowledge. This contribution demonstrates the need for tailored risk management approaches for the risk-based development of biosimilars and provides novel tools for the integration of additional knowledge available for these products. LAY ABSTRACT: The pharmaceutical industry is facing challenges such as profit loss and price competition. Companies are forced to rationalize business models and to cut costs in development as well as manufacturing. These trends recently hinder the implementation of any concepts that do not offer certain financial benefit or promise a long return of investment. Quality by design (QbD) is a concept that is currently struggling for more acceptance from the side of the pharmaceutical industry. To achieve this, the major goals of QbD have to be revisited and QbD tools have to be subsequently developed. This contribution offers an example as to how implement risk management in early-stage biosimilar development as part of the QbD concept. The main goal was to go beyond the conventional QbD workflow and to adjust risk management to the challenges of biosimilar products. Accordingly, instead of using methods like failure mode and effects analysis, recommendations of the ICH Q9 guideline were reviewed and put into practice by creating tailored risk assessment tools. The novelty of this contribution is to report those tailored tools ready-to-use for early bioprocess development of biosimilars along QbD principles.

[1]  Carl-Fredrik Mandenius,et al.  Quality-by-design for biotechnology-related pharmaceuticals. , 2009, Biotechnology journal.

[2]  R. Guy,et al.  International Conference on Harmonisation , 2014 .

[3]  Lawrence X. Yu Pharmaceutical Quality by Design: Product and Process Development, Understanding, and Control , 2008, Pharmaceutical Research.

[4]  Cleo Kontoravdi,et al.  Towards the implementation of quality by design to the production of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies with desired glycosylation patterns , 2010, Biotechnology progress.

[5]  M. Antoniewicz,et al.  Towards dynamic metabolic flux analysis in CHO cell cultures , 2012, Biotechnology journal.

[6]  John R. Engen,et al.  Analytical tools for characterizing biopharmaceuticals and the implications for biosimilars , 2012, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[7]  Niki S. C. Wong,et al.  Combined in silico modeling and metabolomics analysis to characterize fed‐batch CHO cell culture , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  Christoph Herwig,et al.  Information Processing: Rate-Based Investigation of Cell Physiological Changes along Design Space Development , 2012, PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

[9]  C. Schneider,et al.  Setting the stage for biosimilar monoclonal antibodies , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Michael W Laird,et al.  Characterization of a Monoclonal Antibody Cell Culture Production Process Using a Quality by Design Approach , 2010, Molecular biotechnology.

[11]  Patrick Thompson,et al.  Defining process design space for monoclonal antibody cell culture , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[12]  M. Mccamish,et al.  Worldwide experience with biosimilar development , 2011, mAbs.

[13]  Roger Nosal,et al.  PQLI Definition of Criticality , 2008, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation.

[14]  A. Kudrin Overview of the biosimilars: Strategic considerations of various issues , 2012 .

[15]  A. Rathore,et al.  Quality by design for biopharmaceuticals , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  Alex Eon-Duval,et al.  Application of Quality by Design to the characterization of the cell culture process of an Fc-Fusion protein. , 2012, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[17]  Ningning Ma,et al.  A single nutrient feed supports both chemically defined NS0 and CHO fed‐batch processes: Improved productivity and lactate metabolism , 2009, Biotechnology progress.

[18]  James K. Drennen,et al.  Risk-based Quality by Design (QbD): A Taguchi Perspective on the Assessment of Product Quality, and the Quantitative Linkage of Drug Product Parameters and Clinical Performance , 2008, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation.

[19]  Hervé Broly,et al.  Application of the quality by design approach to the drug substance manufacturing process of an Fc fusion protein: towards a global multi-step design space. , 2012, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[20]  A. Vulto,et al.  Interchangeability, immunogenicity and biosimilars , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.