A Generalized Options-based Approach to Mitigate Perturbations in a Maritime Security System-of-Systems

Due to the complex and highly dynamic contexts in which systems operate nowadays, it has become crucial that, early in the architecting phase, System Architects take into account options to be utilized throughout the system’s lifecycle to improve performance and lifecycle properties, such as flexibility. This paper introduces a preliminary approach that allows for the identification of relevant options, which are capable of mitigating perturbations negatively impacting a system of interest. The approach consists of the generation, evaluation and selection of relevant generalized options (enabling both changeability and robustness), and is demonstrated by application to a Maritime Security SoS case study. The inputs to the process are a list of desired design principles to implement in the system, and a list of perturbations that may affect the delivery of value to stakeholders (options are meant to mitigate perturbations). Four different metrics for option evaluation are proposed, together with techniques that can help during the process of selection of options.

[1]  Jay Clark Beesemyer Empirically characterizing evolvability and changeability in engineering systems , 2012 .

[2]  Hugh McManus,et al.  A framework for understanding uncertainty and its mitigation and exploitation in complex systems , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[3]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Responsive Systems Comparison Method: Case Study in Assessing Future Designs in the Presence of Change , 2008 .

[4]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  11.1.1 Using Natural Value-Centric Time Scales for Conceptualizing System Timelines through Epoch-Era Analysis , 2008 .

[5]  Azad M. Madni,et al.  Towards affordably adaptable and effective systems , 2013, Syst. Eng..

[6]  Brian M. Rom,et al.  Post-Modern Portfolio Theory Comes of Age , 1993 .

[7]  Donna H. Rhodes,et al.  Model-based estimation of flexibility and optionability in an integrated real options framework , 2009, 2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[8]  Mark W. Maier,et al.  Architecting Principles for Systems‐of‐Systems , 1996 .

[9]  Matthew E. Fitzgerald,et al.  8.4.1 Assessing Uncertain Benefits: a Valuation Approach for Strategic Changeability (VASC) , 2012 .

[10]  Hiromitsu Kumamoto,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Management for Engineers and Scientists , 1996 .

[11]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Design for Survivability: Concept Generation and Evaluation in Dynamic Tradespace Exploration , 2009 .

[12]  Perry Edwards Systems Analysis, Design and Development with Structured Concepts , 1985 .

[13]  Adam M. Ross Developing a Dynamic Portfolio-based Approach for Systems-of-Systems Composition , 2012 .