Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system.

Conspicuous consumption is a form of economic behavior in which self-presentational concerns override desires to obtain goods at bargain prices. Showy spending may be a social signal directed at potential mates. We investigated such signals by examining (a) which individuals send them, (b) which contexts trigger them, and (c) how observers interpret them. Three experiments demonstrated that conspicuous consumption is driven by men who are following a lower investment (vs. higher investment) mating strategy and is triggered specifically by short-term (vs. long-term) mating motives. A fourth experiment showed that observers interpret such signals accurately, with women perceiving men who conspicuously consume as being interested in short-term mating. Furthermore, conspicuous purchasing enhanced men's desirability as a short-term (but not as a long-term) mate. Overall, these findings suggest that flaunting status-linked goods to potential mates is not simply about displaying economic resources. Instead, conspicuous consumption appears to be part of a more precise signaling system focused on short-term mating. These findings contribute to an emerging literature on human life-history strategies.

[1]  D. Krebs,et al.  Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology , 2012 .

[2]  U. Lüthi ["It takes two to tango"]. , 2012, Krankenpflege. Soins infirmiers.

[3]  A. Hama,et al.  Spent: Sex, Evolution, and Consumer Behavior , 2011 .

[4]  Vladas Griskevicius,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES Going Green to Be Seen : Status , Reputation , and Conspicuous Conservation , 2010 .

[5]  Gad Saad,et al.  The effect of conspicuous consumption on men’s testosterone levels , 2009 .

[6]  Vladas Griskevicius,et al.  Deep Rationality: The Evolutionary Economics of Decision Making. , 2009, Social cognition.

[7]  P. Kwiatek The New Elite. Inside the Minds of the Truly Wealthy , 2009 .

[8]  Chad R. Mortensen,et al.  Fear and Loving in Las Vegas: Evolution, Emotion, and Persuasion , 2009, JMR, Journal of marketing research.

[9]  Vladas Griskevicius,et al.  Aggress to impress: hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  J. Maner,et al.  Risk-taking as a situationally sensitive male mating strategy , 2008 .

[11]  C. Apicella,et al.  Testosterone and financial risk preferences , 2008 .

[12]  A. Dixson The Evolutionary Biology of Human Female Sexuality , 2008 .

[13]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Showing Off in Humans: Male Generosity as a Mating Signal , 2008 .

[14]  R. Mace,et al.  Life history theory and human development. , 2008 .

[15]  John Tooby,et al.  Relative status regulates risky decision-making about resources in men: Evidence for the co-evolution of motivation and cognition. , 2008, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[16]  Paul L. Hooper,et al.  Mutual Mate Choice Can Drive Costly Signaling Even Under Perfect Monogamy , 2008, Adapt. Behav..

[17]  L. Warlop,et al.  Bikinis Instigate Generalized Impatience in Intertemporal Choice , 2008 .

[18]  Paul Rose,et al.  Mediators of the association between narcissism and compulsive buying: the roles of materialism and impulse control. , 2007, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[19]  L. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The structure and measurement of human mating strategies: toward a multidimensional model of sociosexuality , 2007 .

[20]  G. Miller,et al.  ARTICLE IN PRESS Evolution and Human Behavior xx (2007) xxx–xxx , 2007 .

[21]  Gregory D. Webster,et al.  Sociosexual attitudes and behaviors: Why two factors are better than one , 2007 .

[22]  Robert H. Frank,et al.  Falling Behind: How Rising Inequality Harms the Middle Class , 2007 .

[23]  Vladas Griskevicius,et al.  Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: when romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  G. Miller SEXUAL SELECTION FOR MORAL VIRTUES , 2007, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[25]  Ricardo Godoy,et al.  Signaling by consumption in a native Amazonian society , 2007 .

[26]  J. Simpson,et al.  Changes in women's mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Gad Saad,et al.  The evolutionary bases of consumption , 2007 .

[28]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Schadenfreude as a consumption-related emotion: Feeling happiness about the downfall of another's product , 2009 .

[29]  Chad R. Mortensen,et al.  Going along versus going alone: when fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Peacocks, Picasso, and Parental Investment: the Effects of Romantic Motives on Creativity Natural and Sexual Selection of Creative Displays , 2022 .

[31]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women , 2006 .

[33]  J. P. Morgan,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 2005, Technometrics.

[34]  David A. Puts,et al.  Mating context and menstrual phase affect women's preferences for male voice pitch , 2005 .

[35]  Todd K. Shackelford,et al.  Universal dimensions of human mate preferences , 2005 .

[36]  R. BliegeBird,et al.  Signaling Theory, Strategic Interaction, and Symbolic Capital1 , 2005, Current Anthropology.

[37]  K. Vohs,et al.  Sexual Economics: Sex as Female Resource for Social Exchange in Heterosexual Interactions , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[38]  Ian Yeoman,et al.  Trading Up: The New American Luxury , 2004 .

[39]  Margo Wilson,et al.  Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future? , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  J. Simpson,et al.  Women's Preferences for Male Behavioral Displays Change Across the Menstrual Cycle , 2004, Psychological science.

[41]  T. Pizzari Food, vigilance, and sperm: the role of male direct benefits in the evolution of female preference in a polygamous bird , 2003 .

[42]  Dustin J Penn,et al.  The Evolutionary Roots of Our Environmental Problems: Toward a Darwinian Ecology , 2003, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[43]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial masculinity and fluctuating asymmetry , 2003 .

[44]  Robert L. Mason,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 2003 .

[45]  James R Roney Effects of Visual Exposure to the Opposite Sex: Cognitive Aspects of Mate Attraction in Human Males , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[46]  D. Perrett,et al.  Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  M. Petrie,et al.  Condition dependence, multiple sexual signals, and immunocompetence in peacocks , 2002 .

[48]  Michael C. Bailey,et al.  The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  A. Houde Sex roles, ornaments, and evolutionary explanation , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  J. Simpson,et al.  The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[51]  James M. Dabbs,et al.  Heroes, Rogues, and Lovers: Testosterone and Behavior , 2000 .

[52]  G. Miller The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature , 2000 .

[53]  George Walden The New Elites , 2000 .

[54]  An evolutionary life-history model of gender differences and similarities. , 2000 .

[55]  Thomas Eckes,et al.  The developmental social psychology of gender , 2000 .

[56]  S. Boissinot,et al.  Evolutionary Biology , 2000, Evolutionary Biology.

[57]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Beauty, Dominance, and the Mating Game: Contrast Effects in Self-Assessment Reflect Gender Differences in Mate Selection , 1999 .

[58]  J. Simpson,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  A. Booth,et al.  Testosterone and dominance in men , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[60]  E. Bonabeau The handicap principle , 1998, Complex..

[61]  R. Furness,et al.  Territorial intrusions and copulation behaviour in the great skua, Catharacta skua , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[62]  Roger E. Kirk,et al.  Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). , 1995 .

[63]  R. Over,et al.  Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Commentary. Author's response , 1994 .

[64]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[65]  Douglas T. Kenrick,et al.  Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. , 1993 .

[66]  D. Buss,et al.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. , 1993, Psychological review.

[67]  J. Simpson,et al.  Sociosexuality and Romantic Partner Choice , 1992 .

[68]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[69]  J. Simpson,et al.  Individual differences in sociosexuality: evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[70]  R. Furness,et al.  The effects of changes in food availability on the breeding ecology of great skuas Catharacta skua in Shetland , 1991 .

[71]  E K Sadalla,et al.  Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: qualifying the parental investment model. , 1990, Journal of personality.

[72]  Judith L. Anderson,et al.  Sociobiology: An Environmentalist Discipline?. , 1989 .

[73]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[74]  L. Partridge,et al.  The Ecological Context of Life History Evolution , 1988, Science.

[75]  E. Sadalla,et al.  Dominance and heterosexual attraction , 1987 .

[76]  Margo Wilson,et al.  Competitiveness, risk taking, and violence: the young male syndrome , 1985, Ethology and Sociobiology.

[77]  R. Wootton,et al.  Fish Reproduction: Strategies and Tactics , 1984 .

[78]  R. R. Warner Mating Behavior and Hermaphroditism in Coral Reef Fishes , 1984 .

[79]  M. Gross Sunfish, salmon, and the evolution of alternative reproductive strategies and tactics in fish , 1984 .

[80]  S. Stearns Life-History Tactics: A Review of the Ideas , 1976, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[81]  R. Trivers Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[82]  B. Campbell Forces and Strategies in Evolution. (Book Reviews: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971) , 1972 .

[83]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[84]  P. Baran The Theory of the Leisure Class , 1957 .

[85]  P. Pye-Smith The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[86]  R. Meldola Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.