A flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) has been evaluated by a Technical Evaluation Group (Flex-TEG) of the Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN-ECE). It will be implemented within phase 2 of the global technical regulation (GTR 9) as well as within a new ECE regulation on pedestrian safety as a test tool for the assessment of lower extremity injuries in lateral vehicle-to-pedestrian accidents (UN-ECE 2010-1, 2010-2 and 2010-3). Due to its biofidelic properties in the knee and tibia section, the FlexPLI is found to have an improved knee and tibia injury assessment ability when being compared to the current legislative test tool, the lower legform impactor developed by the Pedestrian Safety Working Group of the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC WG 17). However, due to a lack of biofidelity in terms of kinematics and loadings in the femur part of the FlexPLI, an appropriate assessment of femur injuries is still outstanding. The study described in this paper is aimed to close this gap. Impactor tests with the FlexPLI at different impact heights on three vehicle frontends with Sedan, SUV and FFV shape are performed and compared to tests with a modified FlexPLI with upper body mass. Full scale validation tests using a modified crash test dummy with attached FlexPLI that are carried out for the first time prove the more humanlike responses of the femur section with applied upper body mass. Apart from that they also show that the impact conditions described in the current technical provisions for tests with the FlexPLI don’t necessarily compensate the missing torso mass in terms of knee and tibia loadings either. Therefore it can be concluded that an applied upper body mass will contribute to a more biofidelic overall behavior of the legform and subsequently an improved injury assessment ability of all lower extremity injuries addressed by the FlexPLI. Nevertheless, the validity of the original as well as the modified legform for tests against vehicles with extraordinary high bumpers as well as flat front vehicles still needs to be evaluated in detail. A first clue is given by the application of an additional accelerometer to the legform.
[1]
Atsuhiro Konosu,et al.
Development of a biofidelic flexible pedestrian legform impactor.
,
2003,
Stapp car crash journal.
[2]
Jason R. Kerrigan,et al.
Experiments for establishing pedestrian-impact lower limb injury criteria
,
2003
.
[3]
Jason R. Kerrigan,et al.
EVALUATION OF THE RESPONSE OF MECHANICAL PEDESTRIAN KNEE JOINT IMPACTORS IN BENDING AND SHEAR LOADING
,
2003
.
[4]
Jason R. Kerrigan,et al.
Dynamic Response Corridors and Injury Thresholds of the Pedestrian Lower Extremities
,
2004
.
[5]
Gerald W. Nyquist,et al.
Tibia bending: strength and response
,
1985
.
[6]
Atsuhiro Konosu,et al.
Reconsideration of injury criteria for pedestrian subsystem legform test~Problems of rigid legform impactor
,
2001
.
[7]
O Zander,et al.
Evaluation of a Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor (FlexPLI) for the Implementation Within Legislation on Pedestrian Protection
,
2009
.