ACCURACY OF INTERVIEWER JUDGMENTS OF JOB APPLICANT PERSONALITY TRAITS

This study investigated whether interviewers can assess Big Five personality traits during a job interview. Four raters (self, interviewer, friend, and stranger) assessed the applicant's personality. Results from ratings for 73 applicants demonstrated that interviewer ratings of applicant personality correlate higher with self-ratings (r= .28) than do stranger ratings (r= .09) but less than ratings from close friends (r= .39). However, correlations between interviewer ratings and self-ratings were smaller for the two job-relevant personality traits, Conscientiousness (r= .16, n.s.) and Emotional Stability (r= .17, n.s.) than for the other three personality traits. Variance in ratings suggested the applicants managed their self-presentation on these two traits during the interview. Thus, although interviewers can and do assess personality during the interview, they are not able to assess those traits that would best predict later job success. Finally, the moderating effect of interview design (i.e., structure and content) was assessed. The results revealed that job-relevant interviews, situational interviews, and behavioral interviews did not affect an interviewer's ability to assess personality. Although there was a small (positive) effect for more structured interviews, this affect was modest. The results of this study suggest that future research should examine whether the interview can be designed to assess personality directly, and what the gains to predictive validity are by doing so.

[1]  Matthias Burisch,et al.  Approaches to Personality Inventory Construction , 1984 .

[2]  Matthias Burisch,et al.  Approaches to personality inventory construction: A comparison of merits. , 1984 .

[3]  Michael A. Campion,et al.  Structured Interviewing: Raising the Psychometric Properties of the Employment Interview. , 1988 .

[4]  D. Funder,et al.  Friends and strangers: acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  D. Watson.  Strangers' Ratings of the Five Robust Personality Factors: Evidence of a Surprising Convergence With Self-Report , 1989 .

[6]  Barry Gerhart,et al.  INTERVIEWER ASSESSMENTS OF APPLICANT “FIT”: AN EXPLORATORY INVESTIGATION , 1990 .

[7]  J. M. Digman.  PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[8]  W. Chaplin,et al.  The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. , 1991, Journal of personality.

[9]  R. Baumeister.  On the Stability of Variability: Retest Reliability of Metatraits , 1991 .

[10]  C. Randall Colvin,et al.  Explorations in behavioral consistency: properties of persons, situations, and behaviors. , 1991 .

[11]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[12]  D. Funder,et al.  Predicting personality and behavior: a boundary on the acquaintanceship effect. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: A PROFILE COMPARISON APPROACH TO ASSESSING PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT , 1991 .

[14]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  The Elusive Criterion of Fit in Human Resources Staffing Decisions , 1992 .

[15]  L. Hough.  The 'Big Five' Personality Variables--Construct Confusion: Description Versus Prediction , 1992 .

[16]  Timothy A. Judge,et al.  Effects of Work Values on Job Choice Decisions , 1992 .

[17]  L. R. Goldberg.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARKERS FOR THE BIG-FIVE FACTOR STRUCTURE , 1992 .

[18]  T. Britt.  METATRAITS: EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO THE VALIDITY OF THE CONSTRUCT AND ITS IMPLICATIONS , 1993 .

[19]  Relationships between Assertiveness, Machiavellianism, and Interviewing Success in a Screening Interview , 1993 .

[20]  Barry Gerhart,et al.  Recruiter Perceptions of Applicant Fit: Implications for Individual Career Preparation and Job Search Behavior , 1993 .

[21]  Mark R. Miller,et al.  STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS FOR PILOT SELECTION: NO INCREMENTAL VALIDITY. , 1993 .

[22]  O. John,et al.  Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: the big five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. , 1993, Journal of personality.

[23]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Validity of observer ratings of the big five personality factors , 1994 .

[24]  Steven D. Maurer,et al.  The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. , 1994 .

[25]  Michael A. Campion,et al.  Biodata phenomenology: Recruiters' perceptions and use of biographical information in resume screening. , 1994 .

[26]  Winfred Arthur,et al.  Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs. , 1994 .

[27]  C. Stevens,et al.  Making the right impression: A field study of applicant impression management during job interviews. , 1995 .

[28]  M. Schmit,et al.  Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity. , 1995 .

[29]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relative importance of personality and general mental ability in managers' judgments of applicant qualifications. , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  Deborah F. Goodman,et al.  A meta-analysis of interrater and internal consistency reliability of selection interviews. , 1995 .

[31]  Predicting managerial job performance from personality ratings based on a structured interview: An international replication. , 1996 .

[32]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  A meta-analytic investigation of cognitive ability in employment interview evaluations: Moderating characteristics and implications for incremental validity. , 1996 .

[33]  J. Salgado.  The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  D. Dunning,et al.  Construal processes and trait ambiguity: implications for self-peer agreement in personality judgment. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  T. Judge,et al.  Interviewers' perceptions of persons-organization fit and organizational selection decisions. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[36]  F. Schmidt,et al.  The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. , 1998 .

[37]  S. West,et al.  Moderators of self-other agreement: reconsidering temporal stability in personality. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  J. Burger,et al.  PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF JOB APPLICANTS AND SUCCESS IN SCREENING INTERVIEWS , 1998 .

[39]  Stephanie C. Payne,et al.  The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores , 2000 .