The timing of verb selection in Japanese sentence production.

Many influential models of sentence production (e.g., Bock & Levelt, 1994; Kempen & Hoenkamp, 1987; Levelt, 1989) emphasize the central role of verbs in structural encoding, and thus predict that verbs should be selected early in sentence formulation, possibly even before the phonological encoding of the first constituent (Ferreira, 2000). However, the most direct experimental test of this hypothesis (Schriefers, Teruel, & Meinshausen, 1998) found no evidence for advance verb selection in verb-final (subject-verb and subject-object-verb) utterances in German. The current study, based on a multiword picture-word interference task (Meyer, 1996; Schriefers et al., 1998), demonstrates that in Japanese, a strongly verb-final language, verbs are indeed planned in advance, but selectively before object noun articulation and not before subject noun articulation. This contrasting pattern of advance verb selection may reconcile the motivation for advance verb selection in structural encoding while explaining the previous failures to demonstrate it. Potential mechanisms that might underlie this contrasting pattern of advance verb selection are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

[1]  A. Kratzer.  Severing the External Argument from its Verb , 1996 .

[2]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: indirect election of words , 1983, Cognition.

[3]  Noriko Iwasaki,et al.  Incremental Sentence Production: Observations from Elicited Speech Errors in Japanese , 2010 .

[4]  J. Bresnan.  Lexical-Functional Syntax , 2000 .

[5]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  A reversed word length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking , 2004 .

[6]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[7]  P. Boersma.  Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 4.4.24) , 2006 .

[8]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  Little houses and casas pequeñas: Message formulation and syntactic form in unscripted speech with speakers of English and Spanish , 2008, Cognition.

[9]  S. B. Vincent.  The function of the vibrissae in the behavior of the white rat , 1912 .

[10]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Producing Simple Sentences: Results from Picture–Word Interference Experiments , 1998 .

[11]  H. Schriefers.  Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases , 1993 .

[12]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  Introduction to Government and Binding Theory , 1991 .

[13]  A. Lahiri,et al.  Prosodic Units in Speech Production , 1997 .

[14]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[15]  R. Oehrle,et al.  Books Awaiting Review , 1984, CL.

[16]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Testing a non-decompositional theory of lemma retrieval in speaking: Retrieval of verbs , 1993, Cognition.

[17]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[18]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[19]  Mark C. Smith,et al.  High level processing scope in spoken sentence production , 1999, Cognition.

[20]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  An Incremental Procedural Grammar for Sentence Formulation , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[22]  M. Garrett.  Levels of processing in sentence production , 1980 .

[23]  Heeju Hwang,et al.  The role of the verb in grammatical function assignment in English and Korean. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding , 2001, Cognition.

[25]  W. Levelt,et al.  Viewing and naming objects: eye movements during noun phrase production , 1998, Cognition.

[26]  Albert Costa,et al.  Verb Production and the Semantic Interference Effect , 2016 .

[27]  Howard Lasnik.  - 1-On the Extended Projection Principle , 2003 .

[28]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .

[29]  P. Tabossi,et al.  The picture-word interference paradigm: conceptual effects in the production of verbs , 2002 .

[30]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Watching the eyes when talking about size: An investigation of message formulation and utterance planning , 2006 .

[31]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Analysis of Response Time Distributions: An Example Using the Stroop Task , 1991 .

[32]  L. Wheeldon,et al.  Planning scope in spoken sentence production: the role of grammatical units. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction , 2010, Cognition.

[34]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Syntax in Language Production: An Approach Using Tree-Adjoining Grammars , 2011 .

[35]  Francesca Peressotti,et al.  Distributional analyses in the picture–word interference paradigm: Exploring the semantic interference and the distractor frequency effects , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  Albert Costa,et al.  Planning at the Phonological Level during Sentence Production , 2006, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[37]  Daniel Herron,et al.  A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. , 2004, Journal of memory and language.

[38]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[39]  A. Meyer.  Lexical Access in Phrase and Sentence Production: Results from Picture–Word Interference Experiments , 1996 .

[40]  Angelika Kratzer,et al.  The Event Argument and the Semantics of Verbs , 2002 .

[41]  Tatiana T. Schnur,et al.  Phonological Planning during Sentence Production: Beyond the Verb , 2011, Front. Psychology.