Importance of Habitat Quality and Landscape Connectivity for the Persistence of Endangered Natterjack Toads

The natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) is endangered in several parts of its distribution, including Belgium, where it occurs mainly in artificial habitats. We parameterized a general model for natterjack population viability analysis (PVA) and tested its sensitivity to changes in the values of basic parameters. Then we assessed the relative efficiency of various conservation measures in 2 situations: a small isolated population and a system of 4 populations connected by rare dispersal movements. We based the population viability analysis on a stage-structured model of natterjack population dynamics. We parameterized the model in the RAMAS GIS platform with vital rates obtained from our own field experience and from published studies. Simulated natterjack populations were highly sensitive to habitat quality (particularly pond drying), to dispersal from surrounding local populations, and to a lesser extent to values of fecundity and survival of terrestrial stages. Population trajectories were nearly insensitive to initial abundances, carrying capacities, and the frequency of extreme climatic conditions. The simulations showed that in habitats with highly ephemeral ponds, where premetamorphosis mortality was high, natterjack populations nearly always had a very high extinction risk. We also illustrated how low dispersal rates (<1 dispersing individual/generation) efficiently rescued declining local populations. Such source-sink dynamics demonstrate that the identification and management of source populations should be a high priority.

[1]  Nicolas Schtickzelle,et al.  Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental evidence for patch-specific resistance in the Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[2]  K. Berven.  2nd World Congress of Herpetology , 1995 .

[3]  W. Funk,et al.  Potential causes of population declines in forest fragments in an Amazonian frog , 2003 .

[4]  M. Tejedo.  Effects of body size and timing of reproduction on reproductive success in female natterjack toads (Bufo calamita) , 1992 .

[5]  D. Marsh,et al.  Metapopulation Dynamics and Amphibian Conservation , 2001 .

[6]  Michel Baguette,et al.  Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental assessment of boundary permeability for the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) , 2006, Oecologia.

[7]  M. Baguette,et al.  Demographic processes in a small, isolated population of natterjack toads (Bufo calamita) in southern Belgium , 2003 .

[8]  T Coulson,et al.  The use and abuse of population viability analysis. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  Richard Williams.  Modelling population dynamics of great crested newts (Triturus cristatus): A population viability analysis) , 2000 .

[10]  C. Scott Findlay,et al.  Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines , 2000, Nature.

[11]  John Sabo,et al.  Morris, W. F., and D. F. Doak. 2003. Quantitative Conservation Biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability Analysis. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA , 2003 .

[12]  T. Beebee,et al.  Long-term management of a natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) population in southern Britain , 1993 .

[13]  T. Stephan,et al.  Modelling the extinction risk of isolated populations of natterjack toad Bufo calamita , 2001 .

[14]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[15]  D. Wake,et al.  Amphibian Declines: Judging Stability, Persistence, and Susceptibility of Populations to Local and Global Extinctions , 1994 .

[16]  U. Sinsch,et al.  Dynamics of local and temporal breeding assemblages in a Bufo calamita metapopulation , 1995 .

[17]  M. Baguette,et al.  Gene flow and functional connectivity in the natterjack toad , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[18]  D. Doak,et al.  Book Review: Quantitative Conservation biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability analysis , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  David M. Green,et al.  Sex, isolation and fidelity: unbiased long-distance dispersal in a terrestrial amphibian , 2006 .

[20]  T. Beebee,et al.  INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION BETWEEN BUFO LARVAE UNDER CONDITIONS OF COMMUNITY TRANSITION , 1998 .

[21]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology , 2000, Nature.

[22]  T. C. Beebee.  Environmental change as a cause of natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) declines in Britain , 1977 .

[23]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  On the Use of Demographic Models of Population Viability in Endangered Species Management , 1998 .

[24]  U. Sinsch.  Postmetamorphic dispersal and recruitment of first breeders in a Bufo calamita metapopulation , 1997, Oecologia.

[25]  U. Sinsch.  Structure and dynamic of a natterjack toad metapopulation (Bufo calamita) , 1992, Oecologia.

[26]  T. C. Beebee,et al.  REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS OF NATTERJACK TOADS BUFO CALAMITA IN TWO CONTRASTING HABITATS , 1988 .

[27]  T. Beebee.  Ecology and conservation of amphibians , 1996 .

[28]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Ranking Conservation and Timber Management Options for Leadbeater's Possum in Southeastern Australia Using Population Viability Analysis , 1996 .

[29]  Philip H Smith,et al.  A survey of natterjack toad Bufo calamita distribution and breeding success in the north merseyside sand-dune system, England , 1980 .

[30]  M. Boyce.  Population Viability Analysis , 1992 .

[31]  U. Sinsch.  Mini-review : the orientation behaviour of amphibians , 1991 .

[32]  R. Griffiths,et al.  Interspecific competition in tadpoles growth inhibition and growth retrieval in natterjack toads bufo calamita , 1991 .

[33]  J. Denton,et al.  A Recovery Program for the Natterjack Toad (Bufo calamita) in Britain , 1997 .

[34]  Paul Beier,et al.  Population viability analysis. , 2016 .