Evaluation of management control systems in a higher education institution with the performance management and control

This study aims to investigate the structure and operation of management control systems for performance evaluation in a private higher education institution (HEI). To capture the structure and operation of Management Control Systems (MCS) of the HEI, the survey instrument proposed by Ferreira and Otley was used (2006), called Performance Management and Control (PMC). Thus, an adapted PMC structure questionnaire was sent to 55 managers responsible for strategic actions and plans established in the business of the HEI, having 48 answered questionnaires. Also, four out of the five directors of the business school of the HEI were interviewed, besides the documentary research, for the triangulation of data and to validate the results. In data analysis, the techniques of descriptive statistics and information entropy were used. The results show that the overall level of performance evaluation for MCS reached a mean of 3.62 on the scale, less than partial agreement on the items presented. Some weaknesses were pointed out in the system used, and it was also denoted the need for better alignment among strategy, performance and control. It is concluded that the adapted PMC structure questionnaire managed to capture the structure and operation of MCS for performance evaluation in the HEI.

[1]  Mary A. Malina,et al.  Communicating and Controlling Strategy: An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard , 2001 .

[2]  R. Anthony,et al.  Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis , 1965 .

[3]  Andy Neely,et al.  The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success , 2002 .

[4]  R. Chenhall Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future , 2003 .

[5]  Anders Lindström,et al.  Science in marketing , 1966 .

[6]  Arthur Money,et al.  Fundamentos de Métodos de Pesquisa em Administração , 2005 .

[7]  Kelvin F. Cross,et al.  Measure Up!: Yardsticks for Continuous Improvement , 1991 .

[8]  Margaret A. Abernethy,et al.  A Field Study of Control System “Redesign”: The Impact of Institutional Processes on Strategic Choice* , 1996 .

[9]  Kim Langfield-Smith,et al.  Management control systems and strategy: A critical review☆ , 1997 .

[10]  Christopher D. Ittner,et al.  Subjectivity and the Weighting of Performance Measures: Evidence from a Balanced Scorecard , 2003 .

[11]  M. Hirst,et al.  The role of budgetary information in performance evaluation , 1990 .

[12]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Business Unit Strategy, Managerial Characteristics, and Business Unit Effectiveness at Strategy Implementation , 1984 .

[13]  G. Martins,et al.  Metodologia da investigação científica para ciências sociais aplicadas , 2009 .

[14]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  Budgeting Research: Three Theoretical Perspectives and Criteria for Selective Integration , 2003 .

[15]  David Otley,et al.  The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis , 2009 .

[16]  Robert A. Simons,et al.  Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal , 1994 .

[17]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos , 2005 .

[18]  Anil K. Gupta SBU Strategies, Corporate-SBU Relations, and SBU Effectiveness in Strategy Implementation , 1987 .

[19]  K. Langfield-Smith,et al.  Multiple Perspectives of Performance Measures , 2007 .

[20]  Marc Roubens,et al.  Multiple criteria decision making , 1994 .

[21]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[22]  Alberto Albuquerque Gomes Yin, Robert K. Estudo de caso - Planejamento e metodos. Porto Alegre, Bookman, 2005 , 2008 .

[23]  R. Banker,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Judgmental Effects of Performance Measures Linked to Strategy , 2004 .

[24]  A. Neely,et al.  The performance prism perspective , 2001 .

[25]  Andy Neely,et al.  Perspectives on Performance : The Performance Prism Professor , 2000 .

[26]  D. Larcker,et al.  Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications , 1998 .

[27]  Francis D. Tuggle,et al.  Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes , 2004 .

[28]  Alessandro Borges Tatagiba CRESWELL, John W. Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto; tradução Magda Lopes. – 3 ed. – Porto Alegre: ARTMED, 296 páginas, 2010. , 2012 .

[29]  David Otley,et al.  Performance Management: A Framework for Management Control Systems Research , 1999 .

[30]  Kenneth A. Merchant,et al.  Management control systems , 2016 .

[31]  S. Widener,et al.  Managing Value Creation within the Firm: An Examination of Multiple Performance Measures , 2004 .

[32]  Michael J. Spendolini,et al.  The Benchmarking Book , 1992 .

[33]  E. Martins,et al.  Contabilidade de custos , 2003 .

[34]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[35]  Eric W. Noreen,et al.  THE ECONOMICS OF ETHICS: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON AGENCY THEORY. , 1988 .

[36]  R. Dorf,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action , 1997, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[37]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Linking control systems to business unit strategy: impact on performance , 1985 .