Development and Validation of an AI-driven Mammographic Breast Density Classification Tool Based on Radiologist Consensus.

Mammographic breast density (BD) is commonly visually assessed using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) four-category scale. To overcome inter- and intraobserver variability of visual assessment, the authors retrospectively developed and externally validated a software for BD classification based on convolutional neural networks from mammograms obtained between 2017 and 2020. The tool was trained using the majority BD category determined by seven board-certified radiologists who independently visually assessed 760 mediolateral oblique (MLO) images in 380 women (mean age, 57 years ± 6 [SD]) from center 1; this process mimicked training from a consensus of several human readers. External validation of the model was performed by the three radiologists whose BD assessment was closest to the majority (consensus) of the initial seven on a dataset of 384 MLO images in 197 women (mean age, 56 years ± 13) obtained from center 2. The model achieved an accuracy of 89.3% in distinguishing BI-RADS a or b (nondense breasts) versus c or d (dense breasts) categories, with an agreement of 90.4% (178 of 197 mammograms) and a reliability of 0.807 (Cohen κ) compared with the mode of the three readers. This study demonstrates accuracy and reliability of a fully automated software for BD classification. Keywords: Mammography, Breast, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning Algorithms Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.

[1]  J. Scheel,et al.  Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Based on Breast Density , 2021 .

[2]  L. Rundo,et al.  AI applications to medical images: From machine learning to deep learning. , 2021, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[3]  Inez Yeo,et al.  Automated mammographic density measurement using Quantra™: comparison with the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiology synoptic scale , 2020, Journal of medical imaging.

[4]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  N. Keating,et al.  New Federal Requirements to Inform Patients About Breast Density: Will They Help Patients? , 2019, JAMA.

[6]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Variability of Breast Density Classification Between US and UK Radiologists. , 2019, Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences.

[7]  R. Barzilay,et al.  Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: Clinical Implementation. , 2019, Radiology.

[8]  P. Mukherjee,et al.  An overview of mammographic density and its association with breast cancer , 2018, Breast Cancer.

[9]  S. Hofvind,et al.  Comparison of subjective and fully automated methods for measuring mammographic density , 2018, Acta radiologica.

[10]  M. McEntee,et al.  Intercountry analysis of breast density classification using visual grading. , 2017, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  Ronilda C. Lacson,et al.  Variation in Mammographic Breast Density Assessments Among Radiologists in Clinical Practice: A Multicenter Observational Study. , 2016, Annals of internal medicine.

[12]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening. , 2016, Radiology.

[13]  Pontus Timberg,et al.  Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists’ qualitative classification , 2016, European Radiology.

[14]  Eun Ju Son,et al.  Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[16]  Phoebe E. Freer,et al.  Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening. , 2015, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[17]  V. McCormack,et al.  Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[18]  Stephen W Duffy,et al.  A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors , 2004, Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice.

[19]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.