Influence of the aerodynamic drag on the motion of interplanetary ejecta

[1] A simple semi-empirical model for the motion of interplanetary ejecta is proposed to advance the prediction of their arrival times at Earth. It is considered that the driving force and the gravity are much smaller than the aerodynamic drag force. The interaction with the ambient solar wind is modeled using a simple expression for the acceleration = −γ(υ−w), where w = w(R) is the distance-dependent solar wind speed. It is assumed that the coefficient γ decreases with the heliocentric distance as γ = αR−β, where α and β are constants. The equation of motion is integrated numerically to relate the Earth transit time and the associated in situ velocity with the velocity of coronal mass ejection. The results reproduce well the observations in the whole velocity range of interest. The model values are compared with some other models in which the interplanetary acceleration is not velocity dependent, as well as with the model where the drag acceleration is quadratic in velocity = −γ2(υ − w)∣υ − w∣.

[1]  O. C. St. Cyr,et al.  A comparison of ground-based and spacecraft observations of coronal mass ejections from 1980–1989 , 1999 .

[2]  B. Vršnak.  Dynamics of solar coronal eruptions , 2001 .

[3]  L. Burlaga,et al.  Magnetic clouds and force‐free fields with constant alpha , 1988 .

[4]  M. Dryer,et al.  Simulation of magnetic cloud propagation in the inner heliosphere in two dimensions: 2. A loop parallel to the ecliptic plane and the role of helicity , 1996 .

[5]  J. Gosling,et al.  The acceleration of slow coronal mass ejections in the high-speed solar wind , 1996 .

[6]  L. Burlaga,et al.  Compound streams, magnetic clouds, and major geomagnetic storms , 1987 .

[7]  S. Wu,et al.  Magnetohydrodynamic models of coronal transients in the meridional plane. IV - Effect of the solar wind , 1981 .

[8]  M. Dryer,et al.  Simulation of magnetic cloud propagation in the inner heliosphere in two-dimensions: 1. A loop perpendicular to the ecliptic plane , 1995 .

[9]  M. Kuperus,et al.  Oscillatory phenomena in quiescent prominences , 1969 .

[10]  Scott H. Hawley,et al.  Measurements of Flow Speeds in the Corona Between 2 and 30 R☉ , 1997 .

[11]  B. Vršnak.  Eruptive instability of cylindrical prominences , 1990 .

[12]  T. Detman,et al.  In situ local shock speed and transit shock speed , 1998 .

[13]  B. Vršnak.  Deceleration of Coronal Mass Ejections , 2001 .

[14]  Daniel S. Spicer,et al.  Magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the motion of magnetic flux tubes through a magnetized plasma , 1996 .

[15]  James Chen.  Theory of prominence eruption and propagation: Interplanetary consequences , 1996 .

[16]  N. Gopalswamy,et al.  Interplanetary acceleration of coronal mass ejections , 2000 .

[17]  M. Shea,et al.  Magnetohydrodynamic modelling of interplanetary disturbances between the Sun and Earth , 1982 .

[18]  D. Intriligator.  The Large Scale and Long Term Evolution of the Solar Wind Speed Distribution and High Speed Streams , 1977 .

[19]  James Chen.  Effects of Toroidal Forces in Current Loops Embedded in a Background Plasma. , 1989 .

[20]  L. Burlaga,et al.  Dynamics of aging magnetic clouds , 1993 .

[21]  Daniel S. Spicer,et al.  Geometry of interplanetary magnetic clouds , 1995 .

[22]  B. Vršnak,et al.  Kinematics and evolution of twist in the eruptive prominence of August 18, 1980 , 1993 .