ANALYSIS OF THE ME70 MULTIBEAM ECHOSOUNDER DATA IN ECHOVIEW - CURRENT CAPABILITY AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

The general features of the multibeam echosounder (Simrad, ME70) are covered and trends in recent research on using the sonar systems are stated. Echoview’s current capability for analyzing ME70 data is precisely described in two categories: split beam data analysis and multibeam data analysis. In particular, the visualization and analysis of school in three dimensions and school tracking are illustrated using fish school echoes observed in Bering Sea during the summer of 2008 and 2009. Future software developments in Echoview may include: high resolution bathymetric algorithms to detect reliable sea bottom, advanced school detection in three dimensions even for ambiguous shapes and its editing tool, and incident-angle-TS for supporting abundance estimation.

[1]  E. Ona,et al.  Synthetic echograms generated from the relative frequency response , 2003 .

[2]  Marc Soria,et al.  Effect of external factors (environment and survey vessel) on fish school characteristics observed by echosounder and multibeam sonar in the Mediterranean Sea , 2003 .

[3]  E. John Simmonds,et al.  Fisheries Acoustics: Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[4]  George R. Cutter,et al.  A statistical-spectral method for echo classification , 2009 .

[5]  Sébastien Bourguignon,et al.  Methodological developments for improved bottom detection with the ME70 multibeam echosounder , 2009 .

[6]  A. Hamano,et al.  The three-dimensional GIS using sonar information for coastal fisheries , 2005 .

[7]  Masahiko Furusawa,et al.  The average three-dimensional target strength of fish by spheroid model for sonar surveys , 2009 .

[8]  Pierre Fréon,et al.  From two dimensions to three: the use of multibeam sonar for a new approach in fisheries acoustics , 1999 .

[9]  Laurent Berger,et al.  The new fisheries multibeam echosounder ME70: description and expected contribution to fisheries research , 2008 .

[10]  M. Furusawa,et al.  Effective and accurate use of difference in mean volume backscattering strength to identify fish and plankton , 2002 .

[11]  Jacques Masse,et al.  Acoustic detection of the spatial and temporal distribution of fish shoals in the Bay of Biscay , 1993 .

[12]  Josiah S. Renfree,et al.  Modelling three-dimensional directivity of sound scattering by Antarctic krill: progress towards biomass estimation using multibeam sonar , 2009 .

[13]  D. Skagen,et al.  Improved mapping of schooling fish near the surface: comparison of abundance estimates obtained by sonar and echo integration , 1996 .

[14]  Laurent Berger,et al.  A method for reducing uncertainty in estimates of fish-school frequency response using data from multifrequency and multibeam echosounders , 2009 .

[15]  J. Jech,et al.  Three-dimensional visualization of fish morphometry and acoustic backscatter , 2002 .

[16]  Petter Fossum,et al.  Pretty patterns but a simple strategy: predator- prey interactions between juvenile herring and Atlantic puffins observed with multibeam sonar , 2001 .

[17]  David G. Reid Report on Echo Trace Classification , 2000 .

[18]  Ole Arve Misund,et al.  Recording the migration behaviour of fish schools by multi-beam sonar during conventional acoustic surveys , 1995 .

[19]  Samuel S. Blackman,et al.  Multiple-Target Tracking with Radar Applications , 1986 .

[20]  Noël Diner,et al.  MOVIES-B: an acoustic detection description software. Application to shoal species' classification , 1993 .

[21]  Sophie Bertrand,et al.  Waves of agitation inside anchovy schools observed with multibeam sonar: a way to transmit information in response to predation , 2006 .

[22]  Egil Ona,et al.  Calibration methods for two scientific multibeam systems , 2009 .

[23]  Sophie Bertrand,et al.  A three-dimensional approach to school typology using vertical scanning multibeam sonar , 2007 .

[24]  J. Magnuson,et al.  Characterization of Patches Along Transects Using High-Resolution 70-kHz Integrated Acoustic Data , 1989 .