Earthquake clusters in southern California II: Classification and relation to physical properties of the crust

[1] This is a second paper in a study of statistical identification and classification of earthquake clusters using a relocated catalog of 1981–2011 seismicity in southern California and synthetic catalogs produced by the Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence model. Here we focus on classification of event families—statistically significant clusters composed of foreshocks, mainshocks, and aftershocks—that are detected with the methodology discussed in part I of the study. The families are analyzed using their representation as time oriented tree graphs. The results (1) demonstrate that the clustering associated with the largest earthquakes, m > 7, is statistically different from that of small-to-medium earthquakes; (2) establish the existence of two dominant types of small-to-medium magnitude earthquake families—burst-like and swarm-like sequences—and a variety of intermediate cluster forms obtained as a mixture of the two dominant types; (3) suggest a simple new quantitative measure for identifying the cluster type based on its topological structure; (4) demonstrate systematic spatial variability of the cluster characteristics on a scale of tens of kilometers in relation to heat flow and other properties governing the effective viscosity of a region; and (5) establish correlation between the family topological structure and a dozen of metric properties traditionally considered in the literature (number of aftershocks, duration, spatial properties, b-value, parameters of Omori-Utsu and Bath law, etc.). The burst-like clusters likely reflect highly brittle failures in relatively cold regions, while the swarm-like clusters are likely associated with mixed brittle-ductile failures in regions with relatively high temperature and/or fluid content. The results of this and paper I may be used to develop improved region-specific hazard estimates and earthquake forecasts.

[1]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works , 1996 .

[2]  Yehuda Ben-Zion,et al.  Analysis of aftershocks in a lithospheric model with seismogenic zone governed by damage rheology , 2006 .

[3]  D. Sornette Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences: Chaos, Fractals, Selforganization and Disorder: Concepts and Tools , 2000 .

[4]  P. Shearer,et al.  A survey of 71 earthquake bursts across southern California: Exploring the role of pore fluid pressure fluctuations and aseismic slip as drivers , 2005 .

[5]  Y. Ben‐Zion,et al.  Correlations of Seismicity Patterns in Southern California with Surface Heat Flow Data , 2009 .

[6]  T. Utsu,et al.  43 - Statistical Features of Seismicity , 2002 .

[7]  David M. Raup,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[8]  L. Knopoff,et al.  Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? , 1974, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[9]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  A Probabilistic Synthesis of Precursory Phenomena , 2013 .

[10]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Observational evidence for earthquakes as a nonlinear dynamic process , 1994 .

[11]  Y. Kagan,et al.  Importance of small earthquakes for stress transfers and earthquake triggering , 2004, physics/0407018.

[12]  John B. Rundle,et al.  Statistical physics approach to understanding the multiscale dynamics of earthquake fault systems , 2003 .

[13]  David A. Freedman,et al.  Statistical Models: Theory and Practice: References , 2005 .

[14]  J. Pitman Combinatorial Stochastic Processes , 2006 .

[15]  Y. Ogata,et al.  The Centenary of the Omori Formula for a Decay Law of Aftershock Activity , 1995 .

[16]  F. Galton,et al.  On the Probability of the Extinction of Families , 1875 .

[17]  E. Bonabeau How nature works: The science of self-organized criticality (copernicus) , 1997 .

[18]  P. Shearer,et al.  Waveform Relocated Earthquake Catalog for Southern California (1981 to June 2011) , 2012 .

[19]  Yehuda Ben-Zion,et al.  Collective behavior of earthquakes and faults: Continuum‐discrete transitions, progressive evolutionary changes, and different dynamic regimes , 2008 .

[20]  D. Sornette Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences: Chaos, Fractals, Selforganization and Disorder: Concepts and Tools , 2000 .

[21]  I. Zaliapin,et al.  Earthquake clusters in southern California I: Identification and stability , 2013 .

[22]  Ilya Zaliapin,et al.  Clustering analysis of seismicity and aftershock identification. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[23]  P. Shearer Self-similar earthquake triggering, Båth's law, and foreshock/aftershock magnitudes: Simulations, theory, and results for southern California , 2012 .

[24]  Y. Ben‐Zion,et al.  FAST TRACK PAPER: Observational analysis of correlations between aftershock productivities and regional conditions in the context of a damage rheology model , 2009 .

[25]  Robert Shcherbakov,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics of the Lithosphere and Earthquake Prediction , 2003 .

[26]  K. Mogi Some Discussions on Aftershocks, Foreshocks and Earthquake Swarms : the Fracture of a Semi-infinite Body Caused by an Inner Stress Origin and Its Relation to the Earthquake Phenomena (Third Paper) , 1963 .