Genetic algorithm-based multi-objective optimal absorber system for three-dimensional seismic structures

The problem of optimizing an absorber system for three-dimensional seismic structures is addressed. The objective is to determine the number and position of absorbers to minimize the coupling effects of translation-torsion of structures at minimum cost. A procedure for a multi-objective optimization problem is developed by integrating a dominance-based selection operator and a dominance-based penalty function method. Based on the two-branch tournament genetic algorithm, the selection operator is constructed by evaluating individuals according to their dominance in one run. The technique guarantees the better performing individual winning its competition, provides a slight selection pressure toward individuals and maintains diversity in the population. Moreover, due to the evaluation for individuals in each generation being finished in one run, less computational effort is taken. Penalty function methods are generally used to transform a constrained optimization problem into an unconstrained one. The dominance-based penalty function contains necessary information on non-dominated character and infeasible position of an individual, essential for success in seeking a Pareto optimal set. The proposed approach is used to obtain a set of non-dominated designs for a six-storey three-dimensional building with shape memory alloy dampers subjected to earthquake.

[1]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Optimal placement of energy dissipation devices for three-dimensional structures , 1997 .

[2]  Anita Shukla,et al.  Optimal Use of Viscoelastic Dampers in Building Frames for Seismic Force , 1999 .

[3]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Optimal damper placement for minimum transfer functions , 1997 .

[4]  Dikai Liu,et al.  Multi‐level design model and genetic algorithm for structural control system optimization , 2001 .

[5]  Ananth Ramaswamy,et al.  Multiobjective optimal absorber system for torsionally coupled seismically excited structures , 2003 .

[6]  J. N. Yang,et al.  Optimal Placement of Passive Dampers on Seismic and Wind-Excited Buildings using Combinatorial Optimization , 1999 .

[7]  Mahendra P. Singh,et al.  Optimal placement of dampers for passive response control , 2002 .

[8]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Seismic Design of Viscoelastic Dampers for Structural Applications , 1992 .

[9]  F. Cheng,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization Design with Pareto Genetic Algorithm , 1997 .

[10]  Mehdi Ghassemieh,et al.  Implementation of shape memory alloy dampers for passive control of structures subjected to seismic excitations , 2007 .

[11]  William A. Crossley,et al.  Using the Two-Branch Tournament Genetic Algorithm for Multiobjective Design , 1999 .

[12]  Gangbing Song,et al.  Experimental investigation and numerical evaluation of an innovative shape memory alloy damper , 2008, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[13]  Gangbing Song,et al.  Phenomenological modeling of the cyclic behavior of superelastic shape memory alloys , 2007 .

[14]  Hong-Nan Li,et al.  A one-dimensional strain-rate-dependent constitutive model for superelastic shape memory alloys , 2007 .

[15]  N. Wongprasert,et al.  Application of a genetic algorithm for optimal damper distribution within the nonlinear seismic benchmark building , 2004 .