Virtual morality: emotion and action in a simulated three-dimensional "trolley problem".

Experimentally investigating the relationship between moral judgment and action is difficult when the action of interest entails harming others. We adopt a new approach to this problem by placing subjects in an immersive, virtual reality environment that simulates the classic "trolley problem." In this moral dilemma, the majority of research participants behaved as "moral utilitarians," either (a) acting to cause the death of one individual in order to save the lives of five others, or (b) abstaining from action, when that action would have caused five deaths versus one. Confirming the emotional distinction between moral actions and omissions, autonomic arousal was greater when the utilitarian outcome required action, and increased arousal was associated with a decreased likelihood of utilitarian-biased behavior. This pattern of results held across individuals of different gender, age, and race.

[1]  Vadim Bulitko,et al.  Hiding and searching strategies of adult humans in a virtual and a real-space room , 2009 .

[2]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  William J. Tippett,et al.  Visually navigating a virtual world with real-world impairments: A study of visually and spatially guided performance in individuals with mild cognitive impairments , 2009, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[4]  Godfrey D Pearlson,et al.  Effects of alcohol on performance on a distraction task during simulated driving. , 2009, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[5]  J. Blascovich,et al.  Proxemic behaviors as predictors of aggression towards Black (but not White) males in an immersive virtual environment , 2009 .

[6]  Linda Steg,et al.  The Spreading of Disorder , 2008, Science.

[7]  Robert J. Richards,et al.  :Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong , 2008 .

[8]  A. Rizzo,et al.  Affective outcomes of virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and specific phobias: a meta-analysis. , 2008, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[9]  Cade McCall,et al.  What Can Virtual Reality Teach Us About Prosocial Tendencies in Real and Virtual Environments? , 2008 .

[10]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications , 2007 .

[11]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  A Virtual Reprise of the Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiments , 2006, PloS one.

[12]  M. Hauser,et al.  The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment , 2006, Psychological science.

[13]  J. Henrich,et al.  Costly Punishment Across Human Societies , 2006, Science.

[14]  D. DeSteno,et al.  Manipulations of Emotional Context Shape Moral Judgment , 2006, Psychological science.

[15]  Andrew D. Engell,et al.  The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment , 2004, Neuron.

[16]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game , 2003, Science.

[17]  J. Haidt.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[18]  L. Nystrom,et al.  An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2001, Science.

[19]  A. M. Rosenthal.  Thirty-Eight Witnesses: The Kitty Genovese Case , 1999 .

[20]  L. Petrinovich,et al.  Influence of Wording and Framing Effects on Moral Intuitions , 1996 .

[21]  R. Thaler,et al.  Anomalies: Ultimatums, Dictators and Manners , 1995 .

[22]  W. Güth,et al.  Ultimatum bargaining behavior : a survey and comparison of experimental results , 1990 .

[23]  T. Yamagishi.  The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good , 1986 .

[24]  R. Lance Shotland,et al.  Bystander response to an assault: When a man attacks a woman. , 1976 .

[25]  A. L. Beaman,et al.  Selected Demographic Variables in Altruism , 1973 .

[26]  W. Wright,et al.  Five Types of Ethical Theory , 1931 .

[27]  Mare D. Hauser,et al.  When moral intuitions are immune to the law: A case study of euthanasia and the act-omission distinction in the Nederlands , 2009 .

[28]  S. Hibbert,et al.  Ethically Concerned, Yet Unethically Behaved”: Towards an Updated Understanding of Consumer’S (Un)Ethical Decision Making , 2006 .

[29]  J. Baron,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp Omission bias, individual differences, and normality , 2003 .

[30]  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2001 .

[31]  R. Hammersley,et al.  4 – The Effects of Alcohol on Performance , 1992 .

[32]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[33]  P. Manoury,et al.  The role of the conscious , 1984 .

[34]  John Mikhail,et al.  Universal moral grammar: theory, evidence and the future , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.