Long-Term Responses to Competing Vegetation Management for Pinus radiata

Numerous studies have been carried out to quantify the response to competing vegetation control (CVC) in P. radiata plantations. Most of these publications have reported on the early response in tree growth; however, a knowledge gap exists regarding the growth responses throughout the rotation. In this study, we analyzed the long-term response of P. radiata plantations across a gradient of seven sites in central Chile. Treatments included a no-action control, two spot (circular) areas of competing vegetation control using herbicides around individual P. radiata seedlings (spot herbicide application of 0.75 and 1.5 m), and total competing vegetation control using herbicides. Additionally, three different timings for control regimes were included (0, 1, and 2 years after planting). Competing vegetation biomass abundance during the first growing season ranged from 0.6 to 5.7 Mg ha−1 across all sites. The total competing vegetation control treatment maintained for 2 years (TotalY012) showed the largest gain in stem volume per hectare (VOL) in most of the sites. The sites included in this study showed contrasting values in productivity, having volume yields for the TotalY012 treatment ranging from 238 m3 ha−1 at the site with the lowest annual rainfall (age 12 years) to 471 m3 ha−1 at the southern site (age 14 years). Across all sites, maximum gain in VOL ranged between 21 and 175 m3 ha−1 at age 11 to 14 years and was linearly correlated to the amount of competing biomass controlled during the first year after planting. At the southern, wetter site, plots with only pre-planting spot herbicide application achieved 87% of VOL of plots with TotalY012. Our results suggest that CVC improved the availability of resources at the site for P. radiata seedlings, increasing volume production by reducing environmental constraints to tree growth differentially at each site.

[1]  M. Kimberley,et al.  Optimising spot weed control regimes forPinus radiataplantations , 2019, Canadian Journal of Forest Research.

[2]  C. Gonzalez-Benecke,et al.  Long-term effects of vegetation management on biomass stock of four coniferous species in the Pacific Northwest United States , 2019, Forest Ecology and Management.

[3]  C. Gonzalez-Benecke,et al.  Effect of Vegetation Management and Site Conditions on Volume, Biomass and Leaf Area Allometry of Four Coniferous Species in the Pacific Northwest United States , 2018, Forests.

[4]  C. Gonzalez-Benecke,et al.  Use of water stress integral to evaluate relationships between soil moisture, plant water stress and stand productivity in young Douglas-fir trees , 2018, New Forests.

[5]  R. Rubilar,et al.  Long-term response to area of competition control in Eucalyptus globulus plantations , 2018, New Forests.

[6]  A. Leckie,et al.  Herbicide options for managing competitive vegetation during the establishment of Pinus radiata and Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii in Southland, New Zealand , 2017, New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science.

[7]  E. Bork,et al.  Influence of weed composition, abundance, and spatial proximity on growth in young hybrid poplar plantations , 2016 .

[8]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Long-term Pinus radiata productivity gains from tillage, vegetation control, and fertilization. , 2015 .

[9]  Bronson P. Bullock,et al.  Factors influencing the growth of radiata pine plantations in Chile , 2013 .

[10]  R. Rose,et al.  Integration of soil moisture, xylem water potential, and fall–spring herbicide treatments to achieve the maximum growth response in newly planted Douglas-fir seedlings , 2009 .

[11]  C. Ghersa,et al.  Weeds in Eucalyptus globulus subsp. maidenii (F. Muell) establishment: effects of competition on sapling growth and survivorship , 2009, New Forests.

[12]  C. Rolando,et al.  Regional vegetation management standards for commercial Eucalyptus plantations in South Africa , 2008 .

[13]  Ana M. Garau,et al.  Water stress tolerance in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. subsp. maidenii (F. Muell.) saplings induced by water restrictions imposed by weeds , 2008 .

[14]  R. Rose,et al.  Twelfth-year response of Douglas-fir to area of weed control and herbaceous versus woody weed control treatments , 2006 .

[15]  B. Richardson,et al.  The role of vegetation management for enhancing productivity of the world's forests , 2006 .

[16]  P. Balandier,et al.  Designing forest vegetation management strategies based on the mechanisms and dynamics of crop tree competition by neighbouring vegetation , 2006 .

[17]  R. Rose,et al.  Eighth-year response of Douglas-fir seedlings to area of weed control and herbaceous versus woody weed control , 2005 .

[18]  P. Comeau,et al.  A comparison of herbicide and mulch mat treatments for reducing grass, herb, and shrub competition in the BC interior Douglas-fir zone--ten-year results. , 2005 .

[19]  Mark O. Kimberley,et al.  Testing a juvenile tree growth model sensitive to competition from weeds, using Pinus radiata at two contrasting sites in New Zealand , 2004 .

[20]  P. Smethurst,et al.  Silvicultural effects on the productivity and wood quality of eucalypt plantations , 2004 .

[21]  R. Thomas,et al.  Reduced stomatal conductance in sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) sustained over long‐term CO2 enrichment , 2004 .

[22]  P. Smethurst,et al.  The impact of timing and duration of grass control on growth of a young Eucalyptus globulus Labill. plantation , 2003, New Forests.

[23]  P. Brennan,et al.  Herbicides are more cost-effective than alternative weed control methods for increasing early growth of Eucalyptus dunnii and Eucalyptus saligna , 2002, New Forests.

[24]  R. Wagner,et al.  Competition thresholds for the survival and growth of ponderosa pine seedlings associated with woody and herbaceous vegetation , 1989, New Forests.

[25]  P. Balandier,et al.  Morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica) seedlings to grass-induced below ground competition. , 2004, Tree physiology.

[26]  J. Staden,et al.  Interspecific competition affects early growth of a Eucalyptus grandis x E. camaldulensis hybrid clone in Zululand, South Africa , 2003 .

[27]  P. Sands,et al.  Parameterisation of 3-PG for plantation grown Eucalyptus globulus , 2002 .

[28]  H. Rapey,et al.  Agroforesterie en Europe de l'Ouest : pratiques et expérimentations sylvopastorales des montagnes de la zone tempérée , 2002 .

[29]  M. Kogan,et al.  Weed control intensity effects on young radiata pine growth , 2002 .

[30]  Mark E. Harmon,et al.  Carbon Sequestration in Forests: Addressing the Scale Question , 2001 .

[31]  C. Rolando,et al.  The impact of vegetation control on the establishment of pine at four sites in the summer rainfall region of South Africa , 2001 .

[32]  R. Wagner.  Competition and critical-period thresholds for vegetation management decisions in young conifer stands. , 2000 .

[33]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Root length and biomass in mixtures of broomsedge with loblolly pine or sweetgum , 1999 .

[34]  J. H. Miller,et al.  Eleventh-year response of loblolly pine and competing vegetation to woody and herbaceous plant control on a Georgia flatwoods site , 1998 .

[35]  Robert B. Jackson,et al.  PLANT COMPETITION UNDERGROUND , 1997 .

[36]  A. Vanner,et al.  Mechanisms of Pinus radiata growth suppression by some common forest weed species. , 1996 .

[37]  R. Sands,et al.  Competition for water and nutrients in forests , 1993 .

[38]  P. Dougherty,et al.  Spot-Size of Herbaceous Control Impacts Loblolly Pine Seedling Survival and Growth , 1991 .

[39]  E. Nambiar,et al.  Influence of weeds on the water potential, nutrient content and growth of young radiata pine. , 1980 .