Harnessing real world data from wearables and self-monitoring devices: feasibility, confounders

The increasing usage of smart phones has compelled mobile technology to become a universal part of everyday life. From wearable gadgets to sophisticated implantable medical devices, the advent of mobile technology has completely transformed the healthcare delivery scenario. Self-report measures enabled by mobile technology are increasingly becoming a more time and cost efficient method of assessing real world health outcomes. But, amidst all the optimism, there are concerns also on adopting this technology as regulations and ethical considerations on privacy legislations of end users are unclear. In general, the healthcare industry functions on some stringent regulations and compliances to ensure the safety and protection of patient information. A couple of the most common regulations are Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act (HIPPA) and Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH). To harness the true potential of mobile technology to empower stakeholders and provide them a common platform which seamlessly integrates healthcare delivery and research, it is imperative that challenges and drawbacks in the sphere are identified and addressed. In this age of information and technology, no stones should be left unturned to ensure that the human race has access to the best healthcare services without an intrusion into his/her confidentiality. This article is an overview of the role of tracking and self-monitoring devices in data collection for real world evidence/observational studies in context to feasibility, confounders and ethical considerations.

[1]  Terry Kind,et al.  Social Media and Clinical Care: Ethical, Professional, and Social Implications , 2013, Circulation.

[2]  Aydogan Ozcan,et al.  Mobile health: the power of wearables, sensors, and apps to transform clinical trials , 2016, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  M Househ,et al.  Ethical Issues of Social Media Usage in Healthcare , 2015, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[4]  K. Shimizu,et al.  Location system for dementia wandering , 2000, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (Cat. No.00CH37143).

[5]  Janice Loh,et al.  Technology applied to address difficulties of Alzheimer patients and their partners , 2004 .

[6]  D. Nathan,et al.  Implementation of capillary blood glucose monitoring in a teaching hospital and determination of program requirements to maintain quality testing. , 1992, The American journal of medicine.

[7]  R. Kalyani,et al.  Assessing glycemia in diabetes using self-monitoring blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c. , 2006, JAMA.

[8]  J. Ainsworth,et al.  The feasibility and validity of ambulatory self-report of psychotic symptoms using a smartphone software application , 2012, BMC Psychiatry.

[9]  A. McNamee,et al.  Ethical Issues arising from the Real Time Tracking and Monitoring of People Using GPS-based Location Services , 2005 .

[10]  D. Z. Sands,et al.  Guidelines for the clinical use of electronic mail with patients. The AMIA Internet Working Group, Task Force on Guidelines for the Use of Clinic-Patient Electronic Mail. , 1998, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[11]  J. Grant-Kels,et al.  "You'd know if you 'friended' me on Facebook": legal, moral, and ethical considerations of online social media. , 2013, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[12]  Shifali Arora,et al.  Privacy and Security in Mobile Health (mHealth) Research , 2014, Alcohol research : current reviews.

[13]  Jack V Tu,et al.  Impracticability of informed consent in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Mark Speechley,et al.  Health Technologies for Monitoring and Managing Diabetes: A Systematic Review , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.