Analysis of material recovery facilities for use in life-cycle assessment.

Insights derived from life-cycle assessment of solid waste management strategies depend critically on assumptions, data, and modeling at the unit process level. Based on new primary data, a process model was developed to estimate the cost and energy use associated with material recovery facilities (MRFs), which are responsible for sorting recyclables into saleable streams and as such represent a key piece of recycling infrastructure. The model includes four modules, each with a different process flow, for separation of single-stream, dual-stream, pre-sorted recyclables, and mixed-waste. Each MRF type has a distinct combination of equipment and default input waste composition. Model results for total amortized costs from each MRF type ranged from $19.8 to $24.9 per Mg (1Mg=1 metric ton) of waste input. Electricity use ranged from 4.7 to 7.8kWh per Mg of waste input. In a single-stream MRF, equipment required for glass separation consumes 28% of total facility electricity consumption, while all other pieces of material recovery equipment consume less than 10% of total electricity. The dual-stream and mixed-waste MRFs have similar electricity consumption to a single-stream MRF. Glass separation contributes a much larger fraction of electricity consumption in a pre-sorted MRF, due to lower overall facility electricity consumption. Parametric analysis revealed that reducing separation efficiency for each piece of equipment by 25% altered total facility electricity consumption by less than 4% in each case. When model results were compared with actual data for an existing single-stream MRF, the model estimated the facility's electricity consumption within 2%. The results from this study can be integrated into LCAs of solid waste management with system boundaries that extend from the curb through final disposal.

[1]  Angeles Blanco,et al.  Analysis of the quality of the recovered paper from commingled collection systems , 2013 .

[2]  Costas A. Velis,et al.  Production and Quality Assurance of Solid Recovered Fuels Using Mechanical—Biological Treatment (MBT) of Waste: A Comprehensive Assessment , 2010 .

[3]  Costas A. Velis,et al.  Solid recovered fuel: materials flow analysis and fuel property development during the mechanical processing of biodried waste. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Rubén Miranda Carreño,et al.  Analysis of the quality of the recovered paper from commingled collection systems , 2013 .

[5]  Monia Niero,et al.  Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems--part II: methodological guidance for a better practice. , 2014, Waste management.

[6]  Vera Susanne Rotter,et al.  Material flow analysis of RDF-production processes. , 2004, Waste management.

[7]  Nickolas J. Themelis,et al.  Greenhouse gas impact of dual stream and single stream collection and separation of recyclables , 2012 .

[8]  Thomas H Christensen,et al.  Assessing recycling versus incineration of key materials in municipal waste: The importance of efficient energy recovery and transport distances. , 2012, Waste management.

[9]  J. Prins Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council , 2006 .

[10]  Matthew Franchetti,et al.  Case study: Determination of the economic and operational feasibility of a material recovery facility for municipal recycling in Lucas County, Ohio, USA , 2009 .

[11]  Nickolas J Themelis,et al.  Recycling in a Megacity , 2004, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[12]  S. Ranji Ranjithan,et al.  A generalized multistage optimization modeling framework for life cycle assessment-based integrated solid waste management , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[13]  Mikhail Chester,et al.  Energy, greenhouse gas, and cost reductions for municipal recycling systems. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Anthony Rush Combs,et al.  Life Cycle Analysis of Recycling Facilities in a Carbon Constrained World. , 2011 .