The Five Factor Model in personnel selection: Measurement equivalence between applicant and non-applicant groups

Abstract This study investigates the measurement equivalence of a Five Factor measure of personality between applicant and non-applicant samples. The Big Five Questionnaire-2 was administered in two samples: A group of volunteers ( n  = 903), who completed the test for research purposes, and a group applying for jobs, who completed the test during hiring procedures ( n  = 401). Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis on item composites was conducted to test for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures of twenty facets of the Five Factors. Item-level analyses were carried out through analysis of variance to further examine the issue of measurement invariance. Findings suggested that personality facets have the same measurement unit across applicants and non-applicants, while a lack of equivalence was found in the origin of the scales. Similar results were found at the item-level. Implications for personality assessment are advanced and discussed.

[1]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research , 1998 .

[2]  David Watkins,et al.  The Issue Of Measurement Invariance Revisited , 2003 .

[3]  Michael T. Brannick,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Job Applicant Faking on Personality Measures , 2006 .

[4]  D B Smith,et al.  Personnel selection and the five-factor model: reexamining the effects of appplicant's frame of reference. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research , 2000 .

[6]  Adam W. Meade,et al.  Problems With Item Parceling for Confirmatory Factor Analytic Tests of Measurement Invariance , 2006 .

[7]  N. Schmitt,et al.  Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications , 2008 .

[8]  Ann Marie Ryan,et al.  The Big Five in Personnel Selection: Factor Structure in Applicant and Nonapplicant Populations , 1993 .

[9]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Item Response Theory , 1984, The History of Educational Measurement.

[10]  H. Livneh,et al.  The five-factor model of personality: Is evidence of its cross-measure validity premature? , 1989 .

[11]  Filip De Fruyt,et al.  RIASEC TYPES AND BIG FIVE TRAITS AS PREDICTORS OF EMPLOYMENT STATUS AND NATURE OF EMPLOYMENT , 1999 .

[12]  F.J.R. van de Vijver,et al.  Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research , 1997 .

[13]  Amery D. Wu,et al.  Decoding the Meaning of Factorial Invariance and Updating the Practice of Multi-group Confirmatory Factor Analysis: A Demonstration With TIMSS Data , 2007 .

[14]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[15]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Assessing Extreme and Acquiescence Response Sets in Cross-Cultural Research Using Structural Equations Modeling , 2000 .

[16]  W. Meredith.  Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance , 1993 .

[17]  Jeanne A. Teresi,et al.  An Essay on Measurement and Factorial Invariance , 2006, Medical care.

[18]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[19]  J. M. Digman.  PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[20]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next? , 2001 .

[21]  Joseph G. Rosse,et al.  The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. , 1998 .

[22]  J. Levin,et al.  The five‐factor personality model in applied settings , 1994 .

[23]  S. Finney,et al.  Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling , 2001 .

[24]  I. Nikolaou,et al.  The Stability of the Five-Factor Model of Personality in Personnel Selection And Assessment in Greece , 2001 .

[25]  D. Ones,et al.  Personality Measures in Personnel Selection: Some New Contributions , 2007 .

[26]  B. Schneider.  THE PEOPLE MAKE THE PLACE , 1987 .

[27]  K. Jöreskog.  A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1969 .

[28]  P. Costa,et al.  Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. , 1996 .

[29]  Joyce Hogan,et al.  Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  C. Robie,et al.  The Implications of Impression Management for Personality Research in Organizations , 2004 .

[31]  B. Byrne,et al.  Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. , 1989 .

[32]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[33]  Jill E. Ellingson,et al.  Personality assessment across selection and development contexts: insights into response distortion. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.