From Coarse to Fine? Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Cortical Face Processing
暂无分享,去创建一个
Rainer Goebel | Christine Schiltz | Valerie Goffaux | Judith Peters | Bernadette Jansma | R. Goebel | V. Goffaux | J. Peters | C. Schiltz | B. Jansma | Julie Haubrechts | Julie Haubrechts
[1] R. Watt. Scanning from coarse to fine spatial scales in the human visual system after the onset of a stimulus. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[2] Russell A. Epstein,et al. The Parahippocampal Place Area Recognition, Navigation, or Encoding? , 1999, Neuron.
[3] Robert A. Frazor,et al. Visual cortex neurons of monkeys and cats: temporal dynamics of the spatial frequency response function. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.
[4] Valérie Goffaux,et al. Spatial interactions in upright and inverted faces: Re-exploration of spatial scale influence , 2009, Vision Research.
[5] Allison B Sekuler,et al. Holistic Processing Is Not Correlated With Face-Identification Accuracy , 2010, Psychological science.
[6] Kenneth O. Johnson,et al. Spatiotemporal Receptive Fields of Peripheral Afferents and Cortical Area 3b and 1 Neurons in the Primate Somatosensory System , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[7] Alasdair D F Clarke,et al. Modeling visual search on a rough surface. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[8] Christoph M. Michel,et al. The Neural Substrates and Timing of Top–Down Processes during Coarse-to-Fine Categorization of Visual Scenes: A Combined fMRI and ERP Study , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[9] J. Hegdé. Time course of visual perception: Coarse-to-fine processing and beyond , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.
[10] P. C. Murphy,et al. Cerebral Cortex , 2017, Cerebral Cortex.
[11] RussLL L. Ds Vnlos,et al. SPATIAL FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF CELLS IN MACAQUE VISUAL CORTEX , 2022 .
[12] Lynn C. Robertson,et al. Using spatial frequency scales for processing face features and face configuration: An ERP analysis , 2008, Brain Research.
[13] J. Keenan,et al. Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia , 2002, Neurology.
[14] R. L. de Valois,et al. Psychophysical studies of monkey vision. 3. Spatial luminance contrast sensitivity tests of macaque and human observers. , 1974, Vision research.
[15] H. Halit,et al. Is high-spatial frequency information used in the early stages of face detection? , 2006, Brain Research.
[16] M. Tarr,et al. The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.
[17] D. Tolhurst,et al. Amplitude spectra of natural images , 1992 .
[18] Bruno Rossion,et al. Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[19] L. Chalupa,et al. The visual neurosciences , 2004 .
[20] Carl R Olson,et al. Representing the Forest before the Trees: A Global Advantage Effect in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[21] Isabel Gauthier,et al. Sensitivity to spatial frequency and orientation content is not specific to face perception , 2009, Vision Research.
[22] R. Weale. Vision. A Computational Investigation Into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. David Marr , 1983 .
[23] I Biederman,et al. Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[24] T. Hendler,et al. A hierarchical axis of object processing stages in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.
[25] N. Kanwisher,et al. The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[26] M. Bar. The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[27] R. Dolan,et al. Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.
[28] Milena Mihaylova,et al. Peripheral and central delay in processing high spatial frequencies: reaction time and VEP latency studies , 1999, Vision Research.
[29] Chantal Kemner,et al. Is the early modulation of brain activity by fearful facial expressions primarily mediated by coarse low spatial frequency information? , 2009, Journal of vision.
[30] Q. Vuong,et al. The Respective Role of Low and High Spatial Frequencies in Supporting Configural and Featural Processing of Faces , 2005, Perception.
[31] Edward A Essock,et al. A horizontal bias in human visual processing of orientation and its correspondence to the structural components of natural scenes. , 2004, Journal of vision.
[32] Ayla Ergün,et al. Delayed inhibition in cortical receptive fields and the discrimination of complex stimuli. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.
[33] I. Biederman,et al. Size tuning in the absence of spatial frequency tuning in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.
[34] H. Hughes,et al. Global Precedence, Spatial Frequency Channels, and the Statistics of Natural Images , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[35] Michael L. Mack,et al. Holistic processing of faces happens at a glance , 2009, Vision Research.
[36] P. Bennett,et al. Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers , 1999, Vision Research.
[37] D. Jeffreys,et al. The influence of spatial frequency on the reaction times and evoked potentials recorded to grating pattern stimuli , 1985, Vision Research.
[38] Ana F. Vicente,et al. Spatial frequency components influence cell activity in the inferotemporal cortex , 2009, Visual Neuroscience.
[39] Christian Keysers,et al. Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[40] J Sergent,et al. Varieties of functional deficits in prosopagnosia. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.
[41] R. Malach,et al. Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[42] M. Bar,et al. Magnocellular Projections as the Trigger of Top-Down Facilitation in Recognition , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[43] R. Goebel,et al. Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[44] Kenji Kawano,et al. Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex , 1999, Nature.
[45] N. Kanwisher,et al. Does the fusiform face area contain subregions highly selective for nonfaces? , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.
[46] M. Seghier,et al. A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[47] D J Field,et al. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[48] D. Ringach,et al. Dynamics of Spatial Frequency Tuning in Macaque V1 , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[49] E. Rolls,et al. Role of low and high spatial frequencies in the face-selective responses of neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey , 1985, Vision Research.
[50] D. M. Parker,et al. Perceptual latency and spatial frequency , 1987, Vision Research.
[51] R. Näsänen. Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images , 1999, Vision Research.
[52] I. Gauthier,et al. Spatial scale contribution to early visual differences between face and object processing. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[53] T. Allison,et al. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.
[54] S. Hochstein,et al. View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.
[55] I. Biederman. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.
[56] Jedediah M. Singer,et al. Holistic processing unites face parts across time , 2006, Vision Research.
[57] P. Bex,et al. Spatial frequency, phase, and the contrast of natural images. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[58] J. Bullier. Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.
[59] Isabel Gauthier,et al. Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[60] P. H. Schiller,et al. Spatial frequency and orientation tuning dynamics in area V1 , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[61] J R Lishman,et al. Temporal Integration of Spatially Filtered Visual Images , 1992, Perception.
[62] G. Hole,et al. Featural and Configurational Processes in the Recognition of Faces of Different Familiarity , 2000, Perception.
[63] Martial Mermillod,et al. Effect of temporal constraints on hemispheric asymmetries during spatial frequency processing , 2006, Brain and Cognition.
[64] V. Goffaux,et al. Newborns’ face recognition is based on spatial frequencies below 0.5 cycles per degree , 2008, Cognition.
[65] A. Oliva,et al. From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .
[66] R. Tootell,et al. An anterior temporal face patch in human cortex, predicted by macaque maps , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[67] Elena A Allen,et al. Dynamic Spatial Processing Originates in Early Visual Pathways , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[68] Christoph M. Michel,et al. Hemispheric specialization of human inferior temporal cortex during coarse-to-fine and fine-to-coarse analysis of natural visual scenes , 2005, NeuroImage.
[69] I. Biederman,et al. What makes faces special? , 2006, Vision Research.
[70] Isabel Gauthier,et al. Individual differences in FFA activity suggest independent processing at different spatial scales , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[71] R. Kakigi,et al. Electrophysiological studies on human pain perception , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[72] J. Haxby,et al. The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[73] R. Hess,et al. What causes non-monotonic tuning of fMRI response to noisy images? , 2002, Current Biology.
[74] J. Voke,et al. The visual cortex. , 1983, Nursing mirror.
[75] J. Sergent,et al. Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[76] R. Hari,et al. Face recognition and cortical responses show similar sensitivity to noise spatial frequency. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.
[77] W. K. Simmons,et al. Measuring selectivity in fMRI data , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.
[78] Stephane J. M. Rainville,et al. The effects of spatial frequency overlap on face recognition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[79] Nikolaus F Troje,et al. Face recognition is affected by similarity in spatial frequency range to a greater degree than within-category object recognition. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[80] Bruno Rossion,et al. Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.
[81] Tetsuya Iidaka,et al. Spatial frequency of visual image modulates neural responses in the temporo-occipital lobe. An investigation with event-related fMRI. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[82] D. Maurer,et al. Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.
[83] D. Heeger,et al. Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[84] D. G. Albrecht,et al. Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.
[85] Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al. Scale invariant adaptation in fusiform face-responsive regions , 2004, NeuroImage.
[86] R. Goebel,et al. Face inversion disrupts the perception of vertical relations between features in the right human occipito-temporal cortex. , 2009, Journal of neuropsychology.
[87] J R Lishman,et al. Evidence for the View That Temporospatial Integration in Vision is Temporally Anisotropic , 1997, Perception.