High speed wafer scale bulge testing for the determination of thin film mechanical properties.

A wafer scale bulge testing system has been constructed to study the mechanical properties of thin films and microstructures. The custom built test stage was coupled with a pressure regulation system and optical profilometer which gives high accuracy three-dimensional topographic images collected on the time scale of seconds. Membrane deflection measurements can be made on the wafer scale (50-150 mm) with up to nanometer-scale vertical resolution. Gauge pressures up to 689 kPa (100 psi) are controlled using an electronic regulator with and accuracy of approximately 0.344 kPa (0.05 psi). Initial testing was performed on square diaphragms 350, 550, and 1200 microm in width comprised of 720+/-10 nm thick low pressure chemical vapor deposited silicon nitride with approximately 20 nm of e-beam evaporated aluminum. These initial experiments were focused on measuring the system limitations and used to determine what range of deflections and pressures can be accurately measured and controlled. Gauge pressures from 0 to approximately 8.3 kPa (1.2 psi) were initially applied to the bottom side of the diaphragms and their deflection was subsequently measured. The overall pressure resolution of the system is good (approximately 350 Pa) but small fluctuations existed at pressures below 5 kPa leading to a larger standard deviation between deflection measurements. Analytical calculations and computed finite element analysis deflections closely matched those empirically measured. Using an analytical solution that relates pressure deflection data for the square diaphragms the Young's modulus was estimated for the films assuming a Poisson's ratio of v=0.25. Calculations to determine Young's modulus for the smaller diaphragms proved difficult because the pressure deflection relationship remained in the linear regime over the tested pressure range. Hence, the calculations result in large error when used to estimate the Young's modulus for the smaller membranes. The deflection measurements of three 1200 x 1200 microm(2) Si(3)N(4-x) membranes were taken at increased pressures (>25 kPa) to increase nonlinearity and better determine Young's modulus. This pressure-deflection data were fit to an analytical solution and Young's modulus estimated to be 257+/-3 GPa, close to those previously reported in literature.

[1]  R. L. Edwards,et al.  Comparison of tensile and bulge tests for thin-film silicon nitride , 2004 .

[2]  Xiangshan Chen,et al.  Plane-strain Bulge Test for Thin Films , 2005 .

[3]  A. Verbruggen,et al.  High-temperature bulge-test setup for mechanical testing of free-standing thin films , 2003 .

[4]  Joost J. Vlassak,et al.  Mechanical Behavior of Thin Films , 1996 .

[5]  Donald S. Gardner,et al.  Plastic properties of thin films on substrates as measured by submicron indentation hardness and substrate curvature techniques , 1986 .

[6]  K. Suzuki,et al.  Nonlinear analysis of a CMOS integrated silicon pressure sensor , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[7]  J. Maibach,et al.  A new analytical solution for the load-deflection of square membranes , 1995 .

[8]  R. L. Edwards,et al.  A new technique for measuring the mechanical properties of thin films , 1997 .

[9]  Mostafa M. Abdalla,et al.  Celebrating the 100th anniversary of the Stoney equation for film stress: Developments from polycrystalline steel strips to single crystal silicon wafers , 2009 .

[10]  J. L. Martin,et al.  Characterisation of TiN thin films using the bulge test and the nanoindentation technique , 1997 .

[11]  O. Tabata,et al.  Mechanical property measurements of thin films using load-deflection of composite rectangular membranes , 1989 .

[12]  Horacio Dante Espinosa,et al.  A methodology for determining mechanical properties of freestanding thin films and MEMS materials , 2003 .

[13]  Joost J. Vlassak,et al.  A new bulge test technique for the determination of Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of thin films , 1992 .

[14]  E. Arzt Size effects in materials due to microstructural and dimensional constraints: a comparative review , 1998 .

[15]  Shuvo Roy,et al.  Examination of Bulge Test for Determining Residual Stress, Young's Modulus, and Poisson's Ratio of 3C-SiC Thin Films , 2003 .

[16]  William D. Nix,et al.  Analysis of the accuracy of the bulge test in determining the mechanical properties of thin films , 1992 .

[17]  In situ bulge testing in an atomic force microscope: Microdeformation experiments of thin film membranes , 2007 .

[18]  D. W. Burns,et al.  A simple technique for the determination of mechanical strain in thin films with applications to polysilicon , 1985 .

[19]  S. Senturia,et al.  Verification of FEM analysis of load-deflection methods for measuring mechanical properties of thin films , 1990, IEEE 4th Technical Digest on Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop.

[20]  James M. Olson,et al.  Analysis of LPCVD process conditions for the deposition of low stress silicon nitride. Part I: preliminary LPCVD experiments , 2002 .

[21]  W. Sharpe,et al.  Tensile testing of microsamples , 1999 .

[22]  Oliver Kraft,et al.  X-ray diffraction as a tool to study the mechanical behaviour of thin films , 2000 .

[23]  D. W. Burns,et al.  Diagnostic microstructures for the measurement of intrinsic strain in thin films , 1992 .

[24]  William D. Nix,et al.  Effects of the substrate on the determination of thin film mechanical properties by nanoindentation , 2002 .