Estimation of soil and crop parameters for wheat from airborne radar backscattering data in C and X bands

Abstract The study of radar backscattering signatures of wheat fields was investigated, using data collected on the Orgeval agricultural watershed (France) by the airborne scatterometer ERASME in C and X bands, HH and VV polarizations, at incidence angles from 15° to 45°, during two years for different soil moisture conditions with simultaneous ground-based measurements. A simple parameterization as water-cloud model with two driving parameters (the surface soil moisture and the plant water content) gives satisfactory results to estimate radar cross sections of wheat for a wide range of frequencies (C and X bands) and incidence angles (20° and 40°) within 1 dB in CHH and XHH and 2 dB in CVV and XVV. At the lower frequency (C band) the attenuated soil backscattering by the vegetation is dominant. It is shown that simple linear relations in C band between radar cross section and soil moisture are insufficient. A correction term for the vegetation attenuation is needed and is determined. Low contrast between the backscattering of dry and wet soil (around 6 dB) for a given vegetation density leads to a relatively high error in the estimation of soil moisture by radar (0.06 cm 3 / cm 3 ). At the higher frequency (X band), the radar backscattering is negatively correlated to the vegetation water content with a saturation of the radar cross section as the plant grows (about 6 dB of dynamic range between low and fully grown canopy) with no dependence on the soil signal. The achievable accuracy in the estimation of crop water content is the same at 20° and 40° and higher in XHH (about 0.5 kg/m 2 ) than in XVV.

[1]  L. Prévot,et al.  Estimating the characteristics of vegetation canopies with airborne radar measurements , 1993 .

[2]  B. Bouman,et al.  Crop parameter estimation from ground-based x-band (3-cm wave) radar backscattering data , 1991 .

[3]  D. Vidal-Madjar,et al.  Soil moisture assessment at a basin scale using active microwave remote sensing: the Agriscatt '88 Airborne Campaign on the Orgeval watershed , 1994 .

[4]  T. Schmugge,et al.  Vegetation effects on the microwave emission of soils , 1991 .

[5]  F. Ulaby,et al.  Microwave Backscatter Dependence on Surface Roughness, Soil Moisture, and Soil Texture: Part I-Bare Soil , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics.

[6]  H.W.J. van Kasteren,et al.  Ground-based X-band (3-cm wave) radar backscattering of agricultural crops. I. Sugar beet and potato; backscattering and crop growth , 1990 .

[7]  H.W.J. van Kasteren,et al.  Ground-based X-band (3-cm wave) radar backscattering of agricultural crops. II. Wheat, barley, and oats; the impact of canopy structure , 1990 .

[8]  D. Vidal-Madjar,et al.  The use of a microwave backscatter model for retrieving soil moisture over bare soil , 1992 .

[9]  P. Pampaloni,et al.  Sensitivity to microwave measurements to vegetation biomass and soil moisture content: a case study , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  D. Vidal-Madjar,et al.  Data Processing and Calibration for an Airborne Scatterometer , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  F. Ulaby,et al.  Vegetation modeled as a water cloud , 1978 .

[12]  B. Bouman,et al.  Multi-temporal, multi-frequency radar measurements of agricultural crops during the Agriscatt-88 campaign in The Netherlands. , 1993 .