ICT4D in China and the Capability Approach: Do They Mix?

For more than a decade, the Chinese government has poured copious resources into rural informatization as a means to increase agricultural productivity and rural economic growth. Such efforts so far have not produced definite results in rural areas, but increasing economic inequality and rising environmental threats have already forced the government to rethink its growth-centered development policy. Indeed, recent government releases clearly state the resolve to departure from the "GDP obsession" of the past. Meanwhile, the past three decades saw the rise of a powerful alternative development approach-the Capability Approach CA, which focuses on empowering individuals and sees economic growth as one element of well-being. Given that the CA can potentially help devising a more coherent and holistic framework for Information and communications technologies for development ICT4D, this paper examines the compatibility between the Capability Approach and the top-down socialist approach towards rural informatization in China. Built on two case studies of rural informatization in rural China, the present paper identifies potential obstacles to the adoption of the Capability Approach and discusses policy implications and suggestions.

[1]  J. Clapp,et al.  Development as freedom , 1999 .

[2]  A. Sen,et al.  The Mobile and the World , 2010 .

[3]  Pamela Abbott,et al.  ICT and empowerment to participate , 2011, AMCIS.

[4]  Jenny Lagsten,et al.  The capability approach as a tool for development evaluation – analyzing students’ use of internet resources , 2012, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[5]  E. Vogel Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China , 2011 .

[6]  I. Robeyns The Capability Approach in Practice , 2006 .

[7]  I. Oosterlaken,et al.  The Capability Approach, Technology and Design: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead , 2012 .

[8]  Martin Ravallion,et al.  Troubling Tradeoffs in the Human Development Index , 2010 .

[9]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[10]  Progress on the global digital divide: an ethical perspective based on Amartya Sen’s capabilities model , 2009, Ethics and Information Technology.

[11]  Liangzhi Yu,et al.  Information for social and economic participation: A review of related research on the information needs and acquisition of rural Chinese , 2009 .

[12]  I. Robeyns Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Human Development the Capability Approach: a Theoretical Survey the Capability Approach: a Theoretical Survey , 2022 .

[13]  A. Sen,et al.  Well-Being, Agency and Freedom the Dewey Lectures 1984 * , 1985 .

[14]  Chun Liu,et al.  The myth of informatization in rural areas: The case of China's Sichuan province , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  Liangzhi Yu,et al.  How poor informationally are the information poor?: Evidence from an empirical study of daily and regular information practices of individuals , 2010, J. Documentation.

[16]  D. Gasper What is the capability approach?: Its core, rationale, partners and dangers , 2007 .

[17]  Robert Davies,et al.  Information and communications in the Chinese countryside : a study of three provinces , 2014 .

[18]  Carol Ting,et al.  ICT policy for the socialist new countryside-A case study of rural informatization in Guangdong, China , 2013 .

[19]  M. Nussbaum Beyond the Social Contract: Capabilities and Global Justice , 2004 .

[20]  Jun Xia,et al.  Linking ICTs to Rural Development: China's Rural Information Policy , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[21]  D. Zinnbauer False Dawn, Window Dressing or Taking Integrity to the Next Level? Governments Using ICTs for Integrity and Accountability - Some Thoughts on an Emerging Research and Advocacy Agenda , 2012 .

[22]  Randeep Sudan,et al.  Rural Informatization in China , 2009 .

[23]  S. Madon Evaluating the Developmental Impact of E‐governance Initiatives: An Exploratory Framework , 2004, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[24]  The institutional framework of the united nations development programme--ministry of science and technology (undp--most) telecenter project in rural china , 2008 .

[25]  A. Sagar,et al.  The human development index: a critical review , 1998 .

[26]  Yingqin Zheng,et al.  Inequality of what? Social exclusion in the e-society as capability deprivation , 2008, Inf. Technol. People.

[27]  Genia Kostka,et al.  Does Cadre Turnover Help or Hinder China’s Green Rise? Evidence from Shanxi Province , 2013 .

[28]  I. Oosterlaken,et al.  Design for Development: A Capability Approach , 2009, Design Issues.

[29]  J. Xia,et al.  Bridging the Digital Divide for Rural Communities: The Case of China , 2008 .

[30]  Govindan Parayil,et al.  Bridging the Social and Digital Divides in Andhra Pradesh and Kerala: A Capabilities Approach , 2008 .

[31]  Liangzhi Yu Information worlds of Chinese farmers and their implications for agricultural information services: a fresh look at ways to deliver effective services , 2010 .

[32]  Jeffrey James,et al.  The Internet and poverty in developing countries: Welfare economics versus a functionings-based approach , 2006 .

[33]  Andy Dong The Policy of Design: A Capabilities Approach , 2008, Design Issues.

[34]  S. Fukuda‐Parr,et al.  Development as Capability Expansion , 2003 .

[35]  Graeme Smith Measurement, promotions and patterns of behavior in Chinese local government , 2013 .

[36]  Yingqin Zheng,et al.  Different spaces for e-development: What can we learn from the capability approachq , 2009 .