People’s willingness to use COVID-19 self-testing in Nigeria: a cross-sectional survey

Objectives Nigeria has been badly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the poor testing coverage in the country may make controlling the spread of COVID-19 challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the general public’s acceptability of SARS-CoV-2 self-testing as an approach which could help to address this gap. Setting A household-based survey was conducted in five urban and five rural local government areas in the states of Akwa Ibom, Anambra, Benue, Kaduna and Lagos, in mid-2021. Participants 2126 respondents (969 were female) participated. A five-pronged, probabilistic sampling approach was used to recruit individuals older than 17 years and available to participate when randomly approached in their households by the surveyors. A 35-item questionnaire was used to collect data on their values towards SARS-CoV-2 self-testing. Primary outcomes were: likelihood to use a self-test; willingness to pay for a self-test; and likely actions following a reactive self-test result. Results Of the total 2126 respondents, 14 (0.66%) were aware of COVID-19 self-testing, 1738 (81.80%) agreed with the idea of people being able to self-test for COVID-19, 1786 (84.05%) were likely/very likely to use self-tests if available, 1931 (90.87%) would report a positive result and 1875 (88.28%) would isolate if they self-tested positive. Factors significantly associated with the use of a self-test were having a college education or higher (adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 1.55; 95% CI: 1.03 to 2.33), full-time employment (AOR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.63), feeling at moderate/high risk of COVID-19 (AOR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.70 to 3.47) and presence of individuals at risk of COVID-19 within the household (AOR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.78). Conclusion A majority of Nigerians agree with the concept of COVID-19 self-testing and would act to protect public health on self-testing positive. Self-test implementation research is necessary to frame how acceptability impacts uptake of preventive behaviours following a positive and a negative self-test result.

[1]  Sonjelle Shilton,et al.  Self-testing for SARS-CoV-2 in São Paulo, Brazil: results of a population-based values and attitudes survey , 2022, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[2]  S. Luchters,et al.  Are Kenyans Likely to Use COVID-19 Self-Testing Kits? Results From a Cross-Sectional Survey , 2022, International Journal of Public Health.

[3]  B. Godman,et al.  Acceptability and Willingness of UAE Residents to Use OTC Vending Machines to Deliver Self-Testing Kits for COVID-19 and the Implications , 2022, Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare.

[4]  R. Pritchett,et al.  Exploration of the uptake of asymptomatic COVID-19 lateral flow testing in Birmingham, UK: survey and qualitative research , 2022, BMJ Open.

[5]  E. Ivanova Reipold,et al.  Values and preferences of the general population in Indonesia in relation to COVID-19 self-testing: A cross-sectional survey , 2022, medRxiv.

[6]  H. Stagg,et al.  Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Related to COVID-19 Testing: A Rapid Scoping Review , 2021, Diagnostics.

[7]  C. Denkinger,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of patient self-testing with a SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid test , 2021, Journal of Clinical Virology.

[8]  S. Issiaka,et al.  COVID-19 in West Africa: regional resource mobilisation and allocation in the first year of the pandemic , 2021, BMJ Global Health.

[9]  S. Hoehl,et al.  High-frequency self-testing of schoolteachers for SARS-CoV- 2 with a rapid antigen test: findings of the Safe School Hesse study , 2021 .

[10]  R. Perera,et al.  Perceptions on undertaking regular asymptomatic self-testing for COVID-19 using lateral flow tests: a qualitative study of university students and staff , 2021, BMJ Open.

[11]  Judith O Sokei,et al.  Full length genomic sanger sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Nigeria. , 2021, PloS one.

[12]  P. Goggolidou,et al.  Self-Testing as an Invaluable Tool in Fighting the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2021, Journal of primary care & community health.

[13]  E. Igumbor,et al.  Nigeria’s public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic: January to May 2020 , 2020, Journal of global health.

[14]  Modupe O. Coker,et al.  Risk perception, public health interventions, and Covid-19 pandemic control in sub-saharan Africa , 2020 .

[15]  M. Raji,et al.  Comorbidities and the COVID‐19 pandemic dynamics in Africa , 2020, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[16]  O. Adesanya Government preparedness and response towards COVID-19 outbreak in Nigeria: A retrospective analysis of the last 6 months , 2020, Journal of global health.

[17]  Z. Zakaria,et al.  Breaking the cycle of the COVID-19 transmission: A challenge for Nigeria , 2020, Journal of global health.

[18]  P. Adepoju Nigeria responds to COVID-19; first case detected in sub-Saharan Africa , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[19]  Sonjelle Shilton,et al.  Assessing Values and Preferences Toward SARS-CoV-2 Self-testing Among the General Population and Their Representatives, Health Care Personnel, and Decision-Makers: Protocol for a Multicountry Mixed Methods Study , 2021 .

[20]  R. Evans European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. , 2014, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).