Prospective Validation and Refinement of a Decision Rule to Obtain Chest X‐ray in Patients With Nontraumatic Chest Pain in the Emergency Department

OBJECTIVES The objective was to prospectively validate and refine previously published criteria to determine the potential utility of chest x-ray (CXR) in the evaluation and management of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with nontraumatic chest pain (CP). METHODS A prospective observational study was performed of patients presenting to three EDs in the United States with a chief complaint of nontraumatic CP. Previously defined high-risk history and examination elements were combined into a refined decision rule and these elements were recorded for each patient by the ED physician. CXR results were reviewed and analyzed to determine the presence of clinically significant findings including pneumonia, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, congestive heart failure, or the presence of a new mass. Odds ratios for each history and examination element were analyzed as well as sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) of the rule overall. RESULTS A total of 1,111 patients were enrolled and 1,089 CXRs were analyzed. There were 70 (6.4%) patients with clinically relevant findings on CXR. The refined decision rule had a sensitivity of 92.9% (confidence interval [CI] = 83.4%-97.3%) and specificity of 30.4% (CI = 27.6%-33.4%) to predict clinically relevant findings on CXR, with a NPV of 98.4% (CI = 96.1%-99.4%). Five CXRs with clinically significant findings would have been missed by application of the refined rule (three pneumonias and two pleural effusions). Applying these criteria as a CXR decision rule to this population would have reduced CXR utilization by 28.9%. CONCLUSIONS This study validates previous research suggesting a low clinical yield for CXR in the setting of nontraumatic CP in the ED. This refined clinical decision rule has a favorable sensitivity and NPV in a patient population with low incidence of disease. Further validation is needed prior to use in practice.

[1]  A. Jaffe,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[2]  R. Jeanmonod,et al.  Validation of a Decision Rule and Derivation of a Modified Rule to Obtain Chest Radiograph in Patients with Nontraumatic Chest Pain in the Emergency Department , 2014 .

[3]  P. Cameron,et al.  Validation of a clinical decision rule: chest X-ray in patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome , 2014, Emergency Radiology.

[4]  E. Hess,et al.  Failure of prospective validation and derivation of a refined clinical decision rule for chest radiography in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome. , 2012, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[5]  Michael C Wu,et al.  Development and validation of a prioritization rule for obtaining an immediate 12-lead electrocardiogram in the emergency department to identify ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2012, American heart journal.

[6]  James McCord,et al.  Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[7]  E. Hess,et al.  Derivation of a clinical decision rule for chest radiography in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome. , 2010, CJEM.

[8]  J. Ng,et al.  Routine chest radiography in uncomplicated suspected acute coronary syndrome rarely yields significant pathology , 2008, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[9]  J. Haukoos,et al.  Assessment of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule for evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. , 2008, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[10]  Mark E Josephson,et al.  Use of the electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  S. Rothrock,et al.  High yield criteria for obtaining non-trauma chest radiography in the adult emergency department population. , 2002, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[12]  N. Crichton,et al.  The Role of Chest Radiography in Patients Presenting with Anterior Chest Pain to the Accident & Emergency Department , 1988, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[13]  R. Buenger,et al.  Five thousand acute care/emergency department chest radiographs: comparison of requisitions with radiographic findings. , 1988, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[14]  J. Perry,et al.  Predictors of positive chest radiography in non-traumatic chest pain in the emergency department. , 2009, Oman medical journal.