Updates and revisions to the BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging lexicon.

[1]  C K Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  T. Uematsu,et al.  Breast carcinomas with strong high‐signal intensity on T2‐weighted MR images: Pathological characteristics and differential diagnosis , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  B. Narin,et al.  Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography , 2010, La radiologia medica.

[4]  G. Glover,et al.  Silicone breast implant rupture: pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging and relative efficacies of magnetic resonance, mammography, and ultrasound. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  C. Kuhl.  The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. , 2007, Radiology.

[6]  Anne L. Martel,et al.  Feature Selection in Computer-Aided Breast Cancer Diagnosis via Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Images , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[7]  G Lutterbey,et al.  Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. , 1997, Radiology.

[8]  E. Halpern,et al.  Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: breast tissue perfusion determined with MR imaging--initial observations. , 2005, Radiology.

[9]  R. Laqua,et al.  Contrast enhancement kinetics of normal breast parenchyma in dynamic MR mammography: effects of menopausal status, oral contraceptives, and postmenopausal hormone therapy , 2012, European Radiology.

[10]  S. Obenauer,et al.  Value of the BI-RADS classification in MR-Mammography for diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors , 2011, European Radiology.

[11]  G. Giuseppetti,et al.  Comparative Study of Breast Implant Rupture Using Mammography, Sonography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Correlation with Surgical Findings , 2008, The breast journal.

[12]  A Vignati,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis for dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI of mass-like lesions using a multiparametric model combining a selection of morphological, kinetic, and spatiotemporal features. , 2012, Medical physics.

[13]  D. Kopans.  Standardized mammography reporting. , 1992, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[14]  Joseph K McLaughlin,et al.  The diagnosis of breast implant rupture: MRI findings compared with findings at explantation. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[15]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[16]  C. Claussen,et al.  Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast. , 1997, Radiology.

[17]  W. Noh,et al.  Background enhancement in breast MR: correlation with breast density in mammography and background echotexture in ultrasound. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[18]  W. Berg,et al.  Rupture of silicone-gel breast implants: causes, sequelae, and diagnosis , 1997, The Lancet.

[19]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  BREAST IMAGING : Positive Predictive Value of BI-RADS MR Imaging , 2012 .

[20]  J. Wiener,et al.  Breast and axillary tissue MR imaging: correlation of signal intensities and relaxation times with pathologic findings. , 1986, Radiology.

[21]  A Heinig,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. , 1997, European journal of radiology.

[22]  T. Uematsu,et al.  High-spatial-resolution 3-T breast MRI of nonmasslike enhancement lesions: an analysis of their features as significant predictors of malignancy. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  Intracapsular implant rupture: MR findings of incomplete shell collapse , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  W. Perman,et al.  A fast 3D-imaging technique for performing dynamic Gd-enhanced MRI of breast lesions. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[25]  S. Heywang-Köbrunner,et al.  Suppression of Unspecific Enhancement on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Mri) by Antiestrogen Medication , 2002, Tumori.

[26]  Ilaria D'Ambrosio,et al.  Breast MRI: Are T2 IR sequences useful in the evaluation of breast lesions? , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[27]  M. Middleton,et al.  Breast Implant Classification with MR Imaging Correlation , 2000 .

[28]  Hon J. Yu,et al.  Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[29]  Kunihiko Fukuda,et al.  High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[30]  L. Skoog,et al.  Proliferation of breast epithelial cells in healthy women during the menstrual cycle. , 1997, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[31]  L. Liberman,et al.  The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  Min-Ying Su,et al.  Significance of breast lesion descriptors in the ACR BI‐RADS MRI lexicon , 2009, Cancer.

[33]  Hiroshi Honda,et al.  MR imaging features of pure mucinous carcinoma of the breast. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[34]  E. Morris,et al.  Patient follow-up after concordant histologically benign imaging-guided biopsy of MRI-detected lesions. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  Elizabeth A Morris,et al.  Background parenchymal enhancement on baseline screening breast MRI: impact on biopsy rate and short-interval follow-up. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  D. Cher,et al.  MRI for Detecting Silicone Breast Implant Rupture: Meta-analysis and Implications , 2001, Annals of plastic surgery.

[37]  Gorczyca Dp.  MR imaging of breast implants. , 1994 .

[38]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[39]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: impact on diagnostic performance. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[40]  Silicone breast implant rupture: comparison between three-point Dixon and fast spin-echo MR imaging. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[41]  J. Baker,et al.  BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[42]  Robyn L. Birdwell,et al.  Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a range of MRI features. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[43]  S. Weinstein,et al.  Follow-up frequency and compliance in women with probably benign findings on breast magnetic resonance imaging. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[44]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluation. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[45]  M. Tozaki,et al.  Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[46]  L. Liberman,et al.  Probably benign lesions at breast magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Cancer.

[47]  Katarzyna J Macura,et al.  Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[48]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[49]  N. Hylton,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. , 2004, JAMA.

[50]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. , 2007, Radiology.

[51]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer aided analysis of breast MRI enhancement kinetics using mean shift c lustering and multifeature iterative region of interest selection , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[52]  E. Sickles.  Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. , 1991, Radiology.

[53]  Matthias Benndorf,et al.  False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[54]  N. Hylton,et al.  Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. , 2006, Radiology.

[55]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Do T2‐weighted pulse sequences help with the differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MRI? , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[56]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast‐enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.