Selection of vacuum cleaner with Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution method based upon multi-criteriadecision-making theory

This study focuses on multi-criteria decision-making theory to pick vacuum cleaner available in the Indian market. The choice of a vacuum cleaner for the customer is an intricate decision-making, the problem involving multiple conflicting criteria such as the cost of the vacuum cleaner, dust bag capacity, power consumption, and so on. The simple methodology based on the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution method is presented to choose a vacuum cleaner. Based on data collection, eight different companies/brands are considered with 26 diverse models. The ranks of the different alternatives obtained with Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution method are presented. The result reveals that the alternative Karcher WD 3.200 comes out to be the first choice, followed by Karcher WD 4.200 and Eureka Forbes Sensi. This approach based upon multi-criteria decision-making is very beneficial for retailer and wholesalers to help consumers/customers for purchasing their product/item or the consumer itself can make use of this simple methodology. The established proof-of-concept could be further used in the different domains of engineering, science, and management, wherein the decision-making could be biased and vague.

[1]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Selection of the all-time best World XI Test cricket team using the TOPSIS method , 2019 .

[2]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  An extended intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method based on a new distance measure with an application to credit risk evaluation , 2018, Inf. Sci..

[3]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 1981 .

[4]  Raman Kumar,et al.  Multi objective optimization using different methods of assigning weights to energy consumption responses, surface roughness and material removal rate during rough turning operation , 2017 .

[5]  Narges Banaeian,et al.  Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: A case study from the agri-food industry , 2018, Comput. Oper. Res..

[6]  K. Yoon A Reconciliation Among Discrete Compromise Solutions , 1987 .

[7]  Chun-Chin Wei,et al.  How to select suitable manufacturing information system outsourcing projects by using TOPSIS method , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[8]  Jamil Ahmad,et al.  A group decision making framework based on fuzzy VIKOR approach for machine tool selection with linguistic information , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[9]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  TOPSIS method based on a fuzzy covering approximation space: An application to biological nano-materials selection , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[10]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 1998 .

[11]  C. L. Karmaker,et al.  Machine Selection by AHP and TOPSIS Methods , 2016 .

[12]  Nuning Kurniasih,et al.  Comparison Analysis of TOPSIS and Fuzzy Logic Methods On Fertilizer Selection , 2018 .

[13]  Nukman Yusoff,et al.  MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING FOR CNC MACHINE TOOL SELECTION IN FMC BASED ON THE INTEGRATION OF THE IMPROVED CONSISTENT FUZZY AHP AND TOPSIS , 2013 .

[14]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  A new approach for multiple objective decision making , 1993, Comput. Oper. Res..

[15]  Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee Developing an MCDM method for robot selection with interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2016 .

[16]  Mohammed A. Omar,et al.  Eco-material selection using fuzzy TOPSIS method , 2016 .

[17]  Gaurav Soni,et al.  Optimization of Process Parameters During CNC Turning by Using AHP & VIKOR Method , 2013 .

[18]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  A TOPSIS Method-based Approach to Machine Tool Selection , 2010 .

[19]  Mohammad Jawaid,et al.  TOPSIS method for selection of best composite laminate , 2019 .

[20]  Tamer Eren,et al.  A combined goal programming – AHP approach supported with TOPSIS for maintenance strategy selection in hydroelectric power plants , 2017 .