Does Negative Affect Always Narrow and Positive Affect Always Broaden the Mind? Considering the Influence of Motivational Intensity on Cognitive Scope

Research over the last 5 decades has suggested that negative affective states narrow cognitive scope, whereas positive affective states broaden cognitive scope. An examination of this past research, however, reveals that only negative affects of high motivational intensity (e.g., fear, stress) and positive affects of low motivational intensity (e.g., gratitude, amusement) may have been examined. Consequently, over the last 5 years, research has examined positive and negative affects that are low (e.g., sadness) versus high (e.g., desire) in motivational intensity. This research has found that affects of low motivational intensity broaden cognitive scope whereas affects of high motivational intensity narrow cognitive scope, regardless of the positivity or negativity of the affective state.

[1]  B. Fredrickson.  The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[2]  C. Carver.  Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect , 2003, Cognition & emotion.

[3]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Attentional states influence early neural responses associated with motivational processes: Local vs. global attentional scope and N1 amplitude to appetitive stimuli , 2011, Biological Psychology.

[4]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  The effect of embodied emotive states on cognitive categorization. , 2010, Emotion.

[5]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Toward an understanding of the emotion-modulated startle eyeblink reflex: the case of anger. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[6]  G. E. Wimmer,et al.  Reward: Neural Circuitry for Social Valuation. , 2007 .

[7]  K. Berridge.  The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: the case for incentive salience , 2007, Psychopharmacology.

[8]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  Attitudes toward emotions. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Piotr Winkielman,et al.  Social neuroscience : integrating biological and psychological explanations of social behavior , 2007 .

[10]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Reducing attentional capture of emotion by broadening attention: Increased global attention reduces early electrophysiological responses to negative stimuli , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[11]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought‐action repertoires , 2005, Cognition & emotion.

[12]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Approach-Motivated Positive Affect Reduces Breadth of , 2008 .

[13]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Embodying approach motivation: Body posture influences startle eyeblink and event-related potential responses to appetitive stimuli , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[14]  Robin L. Kaplan,et al.  Motivation Matters: Differing Effects of Pre-Goal and Post-Goal Emotions on Attention and Memory , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[15]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  The Blues Broaden, but the Nasty Narrows , 2010, Psychological science.

[16]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  The motivational dimensional model of affect: Implications for breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorisation , 2010 .

[17]  Thorsten Meiser,et al.  Defocused attention in depressed mood: evidence from source monitoring. , 2005, Emotion.

[18]  J. Easterbrook.  The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. , 1959, Psychological review.

[19]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  Does arousal per se account for the influence of appetitive stimuli on attentional scope and the late positive potential? , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[20]  B. Parkinson,et al.  Emotion and motivation , 1995 .

[21]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  Late positive potential to appetitive stimuli and local attentional bias. , 2010, Emotion.

[22]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  The role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in emotion-related phenomena: A review and update , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[23]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  Incorporating motivational intensity and direction into the study of emotions: implications for brain mechanisms of emotion and cognition-emotion interactions , 2008 .

[24]  A. Finucane.  The effect of fear and anger on selective attention. , 2011, Emotion.

[25]  G. Hajcak,et al.  Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures: evidence from temporal-spatial PCA. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[26]  C. Steele,et al.  Alcohol myopia. Its prized and dangerous effects. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[27]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  Anger perceptually and conceptually narrows cognitive scope. , 2015, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  A. Isen,et al.  The influence of affect on categorization. , 1984 .

[29]  E. Fox.  Emotion Science: Cognitive and Neuroscientific Approaches to Understanding Human Emotions , 2008 .

[30]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  The effect of low versus high approach-motivated positive affect on memory for peripherally versus centrally presented information. , 2010, Emotion.

[31]  Tom F. Price,et al.  Leaning embodies desire: Evidence that leaning forward increases relative left frontal cortical activation to appetitive stimuli , 2011, Biological Psychology.

[32]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  Approach-Motivated Positive Affect Reduces Breadth of Attention , 2008, Psychological science.

[33]  Philip A. Gable,et al.  Neural Activity Underlying the Effect of Approach-Motivated Positive Affect on Narrowed Attention , 2009, Psychological science.

[34]  Joshua A. Hicks,et al.  Interactive effects of approach motivational intensity and alcohol cues on the scope of perceptual attention. , 2012, Addiction.

[35]  S. Palmer,et al.  Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Attentional Consequences of Pregoal and Postgoal Positive Affects Motivational Intensity in Affects , 2022 .

[37]  A. Anderson,et al.  Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  M. Posner.  The Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention , 2020 .

[39]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  Karen Gasper,et al.  Attending to the Big Picture: Mood and Global Versus Local Processing of Visual Information , 2002, Psychological science.