Product acceptability evaluation
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jiyong Park,et al. Low-fat Frankfurters with Elevated Levels of Water and Oleic Acid , 1990 .
[2] H. Cross,et al. National Consumer Retail Beef Study: Palatability Evaluations of Beef Loin Steaks that Differed in Marbling , 1987 .
[3] Edgar Chambers,et al. Statistical Designs and Panel Training/Experience for Sensory Analysis , 1981 .
[4] Ift. Sensory evaluation guide for testing food and beverage products , 1981 .
[5] M. Conner,et al. COMBINED MEASUREMENT OF FOOD TASTE AND CONSUMER PREFERENCE IN THE INDIVIDUAL: RELIABILITY, PRECISION AND STABILITY DATA , 1992 .
[6] M. O'Mahony,et al. MODIFICATIONS TO SENSORY DIFFERENCE TEST PROTOCOLS: THE WARMED UP PAIRED COMPARISON, THE SINGLE STANDARD DUO‐TRIO AND THE A‐NOT A TEST MODIFIED FOR RESPONSE BIAS , 1990 .
[7] B. Korth,et al. EVALUATION OF THREE SCALING METHODS FOR HEDONICS , 1986 .
[8] Harry T. Lawless,et al. Sensory science theory and applications in foods , 1991 .
[9] R. Shepherd. Sensory Influences on Salt, Sugar and Fat Intake , 1988, Nutrition Research Reviews.
[10] R. Mcbride. Stimulus Range Influences Intensity and Hedonic Ratings of Flavour , 1985, Appetite.
[11] H. Lawless,et al. Direct and Indirect Scaling of Sensory Differences in Simple Taste and Odor Mixtures , 1984 .
[12] Maximo. Gacula. SOME ISSUES IN THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF SENSORY DATA: REVISITED , 1987 .
[13] D. L. Huffman,et al. Development of low-fat ground beef , 1991 .
[14] H. Macfie,et al. Psychological basis of sensory evaluation , 1990 .
[15] J. F. Campbell,et al. SOME SOURCES OF BIAS IN CONSUMER TESTING , 1986 .
[16] C. Kastner,et al. Consumer Acceptance of Vacuum Packaged Ground Beef as Influenced by Product Color and Educational Materials , 1986 .
[17] R. Mandigo,et al. PROPERTIES OF RESTRUCTURED PORK AS AFFECTED BY FLAKE SIZE, FLAKE TEMPERATURE AND BLEND COMBINATIONS , 1978 .
[18] J. O. Reagan,et al. Evaluation of the Physical, Chemical and Sensory Properties of Fermented Summer Sausage Made from High‐Oleate Pork , 1990 .
[19] Hildegarde Heymann,et al. INFLUENCE OF SELECTED MARKETING FACTORS ON CONSUMER RESPONSE TO RESTRUCTURED BEEF STEAKS: A CONJOINT ANALYSIS , 1990 .
[20] Gail Vance Civille,et al. FOOD QUALITY: CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE AND SENSORY ATTRIBUTES , 1991 .
[21] H. Schutz. Food Action Rating Scale for Measuring Food Acceptance , 1965 .
[22] P. R. Durland,et al. 7 – Sensory Qualities of Meat , 1986 .
[23] Daniel M. Ennis,et al. Relative power of difference testing methods in sensory evaluation , 1990 .
[24] L. M. Eadie,et al. Assessment of the Sensory Characteristics of Meat Patties , 1991 .
[25] R. Rounds,et al. Consumer Acceptance of Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) as an Alternative Species to Rainbow Trout (Salmo gairdneri) , 1992 .
[26] D. L. Huffman,et al. Physical and Compositional Characteristics of Beef Carcasses Selected for Leanness , 1990 .
[27] A. Cardello,et al. Consumer Evaluation of the Sensory Properties of Fish , 1988 .
[28] The relationship between intensity, hedonic and relative-to-ideal ratings , 1989 .
[29] Michael O'Mahony,et al. Alternative Hedonic Measures , 1991 .
[30] C. E. Lyon,et al. Physical and Sensory Characteristics of Low‐Fat Fresh Pork Sausage Processed with Various Levels of Added Water , 1990 .
[31] D. A. Stuiber,et al. DISCRIMINATION OF FISH AND SEAFOOD QUALITY BY CONSUMER POPULATIONS , 1979 .
[32] Armand V. Cardello,et al. Perception of Texture by Trained and Consumer Panelists , 1982 .
[33] G. H. Taki. Functional ingredient blend produces low-fat meat products to meet consumer expectations , 1991 .
[34] John L. Stanton,et al. How Has the Quantity of the American Diet Changed During the Past Decade , 1981 .
[35] R. Field,et al. EVALUATION OF RANGE-GRAZED AND CONCENTRATE-FEDBEEF BY A TRAINED SENSORY PANEL, A HOUSEHOLD PANEL AND A LABORATORY TEST MARKET GROUP , 1987 .
[36] Dwight R. Riskey,et al. USE AND ABUSES OF CATEGORY SCALES IN SENSORY MEASUREMENT , 1986 .
[37] P. Purslow,et al. The influence of varying degrees of adhesion as determined by mechanical tests on the sensory and consumer acceptance of a meat product. , 1990, Meat science.
[38] Rhonda K. Miller,et al. Consumer and Trained Sensory Comparisons of Cooked Beef Top Rounds Treated with Sodium Lactate , 1991 .
[39] C. E. Lyon,et al. Acceptability of Bacon as influenced by the Feeding of Elevated Levels of Monounsaturated Fats to Growing-finishing Swine , 1990 .
[40] F. Sauvageot,et al. COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCY OF PAIR, DUO‐TRIO AND TRIANGLE TESTS , 1988 .
[41] Morten Meilgaard,et al. Sensory Evaluation Techniques , 2020 .
[42] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONSUMER PREFERENCES AND TRAINED PANEL RESPONSES , 1988 .
[43] Howard R. Moskowitz,et al. MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION: NOTES ON WHAT, HOW, WHEN, AND WHY TO USE IT , 1977 .
[44] M. Dikeman. Fat reduction in animals and the effects on palatability and consumer acceptance of meat products , 1987 .
[45] Harry T. Lawless,et al. THE SENSE OF SMELL IN FOOD QUALITY AND SENSORY EVALUATION , 1991 .
[46] J. Campbell,et al. PROPERTIES OF RESTRUCTURED PORK PRODUCT AS INFLUENCED BY MEAT PARTICLE SIZE, TEMPERATURE AND COMMINUTION METHOD , 1978 .
[47] D. R. Peryam,et al. Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. , 1957 .
[48] Rose Marie Pangborn,et al. Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food , 1965 .
[49] R. Mcbride,et al. PERCEPTION OF TASTE MIXTURES BY EXPERIENCED AND NOVICE ASSESSORS1 , 1989 .
[50] R. Pangborn,et al. Potential Fallacy of Correlating Hedonic Responses with Physical and Chemical Measurements , 1981 .
[51] LOGARITHMIC TRANSFORMATION OF MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION DATA AND COMPARISONS OF SCALING METHODS , 1989 .