Characterization of particulate emissions from occupant activities in offices.

This paper characterizes the relationship between occupant activities and indoor air particulate levels in a non-smoking office building. Occupant activities were recorded on video. Particulate concentrations were monitored by three optical particle counters (OPCs) in five size ranges at three heights. Particulate mass concentrations were measured gravimetrically and bioaerosol concentrations were determined by impaction methods. Occupant activities and number concentrations were determined with 1-min resolution over a 1-week period. Occupant activities such as walking past or visiting the monitoring site explained 24-55% of the variation of 1- to 25-micron diameter particle number concentrations. Statistical models associating particulate concentrations with occupant activities depended on the size fraction and included an autocorrelative term. Occupant activities are estimated to contribute up to 10 micrograms m-3 in particulate concentrations per person. Number concentrations of particles smaller than 1 micron had little correlation with indoor activities other than cigarette smoking and were highly correlated with outdoor levels. The method can be used to characterize emissions from activities if rapid measurements can be made and if activities can be coded from the video record.

[1]  D T Mage,et al.  Personal exposures to respirable particulates and implications for air pollution epidemiology. , 1985, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Gunnar Rosén,et al.  PIMEX[rgrave]. Combined Use of Air Sampling Instruments and Video Filming: Experience and Results During Six Years of Use , 1993 .

[3]  Richard A. Wadden,et al.  Indoor contaminant emission rates characterized by source activity factors , 1987 .

[4]  Richard A. Grot,et al.  Sources and Source Strengths of Volatile Organic Compounds in a New Office Building , 1991 .

[5]  L. Berglund,et al.  Ventilation requirements in buildings—II. particulate matter and carbon monoxide from cigarette smoking , 1984 .

[6]  Gunnar Rosén,et al.  Detailed Work Analysis for Control of Exposure to Airborne Contaminants in the Workplace , 1995 .

[7]  David S. Ensor,et al.  Airborne particle sizes and sources found in indoor air , 1990 .

[8]  Russell W. Wiener,et al.  A study of characterize indoor particles in three non-smoking homes , 1991 .

[9]  Tracy L. Thatcher,et al.  Deposition, resuspension, and penetration of particles within a residence , 1995 .

[10]  Tiina Reponen,et al.  Everyday activities and variation of fungal spore concentrations in indoor air , 1993 .

[11]  M. Lehtimäki,et al.  Optical particle counters: Response, resolution and counting efficiency , 1982 .

[12]  Paul J. Lioy,et al.  Air Sampling Instruments for Evaluation of Atmospheric Contaminants , 1983 .

[13]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972 .

[14]  Markus Olin,et al.  Indoor Air Aerosol Model: Transport Indoors and Deposition of Fine and Coarse Particles , 1989 .

[15]  L. K. Peters,et al.  Particle Size Distribution of Mainstream Cigarette Smoke Undergoing Dilution , 1985 .

[16]  G Rosén,et al.  Video filming and pollution measurement as a teaching aid in reducing exposure to airborne pollutants. , 1989, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[17]  J C Chow,et al.  Measurement methods to determine compliance with ambient air quality standards for suspended particles. , 1995, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[18]  H. J. Williamson,et al.  Review of receptor model fundamentals , 1984 .

[19]  Stuart Batterman,et al.  TVOC and CO2 Concentrations as Indicators in Indoor Air Quality Studies , 1995 .